NR1D1::MAML1 epithelioid and spindle cell sarcoma mimicking pseudomyogenic hemangioendothelioma in core biopsy: A case report and review of the literature

Epithelioid and spindle cell sarcomas with NR1D1::MAML1/2 gene fusions are rare and emerging entities. Only six cases of NR1D1-rearranged mesenchymal tumors have previously been reported in the literature; they are often characterized by an epithelioid morphology, at least focal pseudogland formation, prominent cytoplasmic vacuoles, and focal to diffuse immunohistochemical expression of keratin. We herein report the first case of an NR1D1::MAML1 epithelioid and spindle cell sarcoma with dual immunohistochemical expression of ERG and FOSB, mimicking a pseudomyogenic hemangioendothelioma (PHE) on core biopsy. The sarcoma arose in the left forearm of a 64-year-old man. Initial biopsy showed a mesenchymal neoplasm composed of epithelioid and spindle cells dispersed in myxoid stroma with scattered stromal neutrophils. The morphologic features, combined with the dual immunohistochemical expression of ERG and FOSB, initially mimicked PHE, representing an important potential diagnostic pitfall. The patient subsequently underwent a radical resection, which showed a much more diffuse epithelioid appearance with nested architecture and pseudogland formation. Next-generation sequencing was performed on the resection specimen, which revealed an NR1D1::MAML1 gene fusion, confirming the final diagnosis. Given the fully malignant potential of this tumor, knowledge and recognition of this rare entity are essential to ensure proper management, prevent misdiagnosis, and further characterize the clinical course of this emerging entity. Comprehensive molecular testing can help to identify these rare tumors and exclude the possibility of epithelioid mimics, including PHE.

Benign and low-grade superficial endothelial cell neoplasms in the molecular era

Vascular tumors are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the skin and subcutis, and they encompass a heterogeneous group with diverse clinical, histological, and molecular features, as well as biological behavior. Over the past two decades, molecular studies have enabled the identification of pathogenic recurrent genetic alterations that can be used as additional data points to support the correct classification of these lesions. The purpose of this review is to summarize the available data related to superficially located benign and low-grade vascular neoplasms and to highlight recent molecular advances with the role of surrogate immunohistochemistry to target pathogenic proteins as diagnostic biomarkers.

Pseudomyogenic Hemangioendothelioma: A Case of a Solitary Lesion With a Very Indolent Clinical Course

Pseudomyogenic hemangioendothelioma (PMH), also known as epithelioid sarcoma-like hemangioendothelioma, is a rare epithelioid vascular neoplasm predominantly affecting young adult males at an average age of approximately 30 years. This tumor is rare; therefore, detailed information regarding this tumor is still lacking. Here, we report a case of a man in his 20s presenting with left foot pain for about one year. Imaging showed a 2-cm ovoid, cortically based lesion with a lytic defect of the cortex at the fifth metatarsal proximal shaft. Histologically, the lesion presented as an infiltrating proliferation of distinctly myoid-appearing spindled cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm and mildly atypical vesicular nuclei. Scant mitoses were identified with no areas of necrosis. Tumor cells exhibited strong, diffuse cytokeratin expression as well as CD31 and ERG. CD34 was positive in a few tumor cells, and integrase interactor 1 (INI1) retained nuclear expression. No reactivity for S100, desmin, smooth muscle actin (SMA), epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), and CD1a was present. Over half of the patients with PMH develop multifocal lesions, often involving several tissue planes; however, distant metastasis is very infrequent. This patient underwent curettage and internal fixation of the left fifth metatarsal and had no evidence of recurrence or distant metastasis after seven years of follow-up. Our case contributes to the growing knowledge of PMH and sheds light on the prognosis of these lesions.

Malignant Superficial Mesenchymal Tumors in Children

Malignant superficial mesenchymal tumors are a very diverse group of neoplasms with few clinical and radiological discriminatory factors. Hence, some of these cancers are rarely suspected based on clinical and radiological grounds, others may be easily misdiagnosed, and the histological analysis of a biopsy or resection is central in the diagnostic process. In children, the age at presentation is a major element of the differential diagnosis. Some tumors have a very distinct epidemiology, while others may be seen at any age. More recently, the advances in molecular biology have greatly improved the diagnosis of mesenchymal tumors and new entities are still being described. In the present review, we provide an overview of the diversity of malignant superficial mesenchymal tumors in children, including new and/or rare entities. We discuss the important diagnostic features, be they clinical, histological, or molecular. Special attention was given to the genetic features of these tumors, particularly when they were helpful for the diagnosis or treatment.

Pseudomyogenic hemangioendothelioma with bone and soft tissue involvement with favorable response to pamidronate: a case report and systematic review of the literature

Pseudomyogenic hemangioendothelioma (PMH) can be a challenge for diagnosis and might be confused with other tumors, such as epithelioid sarcoma. Here we present a case and a systematic review of the literature to identify and discuss PMH treatment in primary bone involvement. A 25-year-old woman was referred for bone pain (10/10) in the left lower limb. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed multiple bone lesions (left femur, tibia, patella, ankle, and foot) with well-defined borders without signs of local aggressiveness. Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT) showed multiple metabolic musculoskeletal lesions in the left lower limb. A CT scan-guided biopsy was performed. Histological and immunohistochemical findings confirmed the diagnosis of PMH. After treatment with intravenous pamidronate (90 mg/monthly), the patient had clinical improvement, mild pain 2/10 without the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or opiates. Follow-up was assessed by MRI and PET-CT. PET-CT showed metabolic resolution of most of the bone and muscular lesions and a significant improvement of the femoral lesion. MRI showed that the lesions in the left femur, tibia, and foot had a marked decrease in size without intravenous post-contrast enhancement and smaller lesions had disappeared. After a 3-year follow-up, PET-CT showed no metabolically active images. Literature review identified 31 records including 58 clinical cases of PMH with primary bone involvement and treatment description for qualitative analysis. Most lesions (69%) were treated by local excision or curettage. In addition, amputations were performed in a significant percentage of cases (20.7%). In the last years, mTOR inhibitors (n = 7) and anti-resorptive treatments (n = 4) were considered as alternative treatment options, especially in multifocal lesions.

Two Cases of Intraosseous Pseudomyogenic (Epithelioid Sarcoma-Like) Hemangioendothelioma With Unusual Features, Expanding the Clinicopathological Spectrum

Pseudomyogenic (epithelioid sarcoma-like) hemangioendothelioma (PMHE) is a distinct vascular neoplasm mostly observed in the lower extremities of young adults with characteristic histopathological features. In this article, we present 2 unusual cases of PMHE. Case 1: A 28-year-old male presented with pain and stiffness in his left shoulder. Radiologic examination revealed an expansile, lytic, heterogeneously enhancing, destructive lesion in his left scapula, along with multiple avid marrow lesions in his other bones. Biopsy revealed a cellular tumor composed of plump spindly and epithelioid cells arranged in fascicles and focally, in clusters, admixed with neutrophils and histiocytes, with interspersed many osteoclast-like giant cells and reactive bone. Case 2: A 63-year-old male presented pain and swelling in his right middle finger, with no other lesion elsewhere in his body. Radiologic imaging disclosed a 1.5-cm-sized lobulated, expansile, lytic, destructive lesion in the distal end of the third metacarpal bone of his right hand. Biopsy examination revealed a cellular spindle cell tumor, composed of plump spindly cells, arranged in fascicles, including "tadpole-like" or "strap-like" cells and interspersed inflammatory cells. Immunohistochemically, tumor cells in both cases were positive for AE1/AE3, CD31, and Fli1, while negative for desmin and CD34. INI11 was retained. The presented cases of PMHE, occurring at unusual locations, in an older individual in the second case, along with variable histopathological features, noted in the first case, seem to expand the clinicopathological spectrum of these uncommon neoplasms. Differential diagnoses and review of similar cases are presented.