Detection of EGFR T790M Mutation by Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction in Lung Carcinoma Cytology Samples

Detection of EGFR T790M mutation using liquid biopsy for non-small cell lung cancer: Utility of droplet digital polymerase chain reaction vs. cobas real-time polymerase chain reaction

BACKGROUND

Digital platforms for mutation detection yield higher sensitivity than non-digital platforms but lack universal positive cut-off values that correlate with the outcome of osimertinib treatment. This study determined compared droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) to the standard cobas assay for epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation detection in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Study patients had EGFR-mutant tumours with disease progression on first/second generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and osimertinib treatment after T790M mutation detection. T790M status was tested by cobas assay using liquid biopsy, and only by ddPCR if an EGFR mutation was identified but T790M was negative. Clinical efficacy of osimertinib was compared between patients with T790M detected by cobas vs. only by ddPCR. A positive cut-off value for ddPCR was determined by assessing efficacy with osimertinib.

RESULTS

61 patients had tumors with an acquired T790M mutation, 38 detected by cobas and an additional 23 only by ddPCR. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the cobas- and ddPCR-positive groups was 9.5 and 7.8 months, respectively (p=0.43). For ddPCR, a fractional abundance (FA) of 0.1% was used as a cut-off value. The median PFS of patients with FA ≥0.1% and <0.1% was 8.3 and 4.6 months, respectively (p=0.08). FA ≥0.1% was independently associated with a longer PFS.

CONCLUSION

Using ddPCR to follow up the cobas assay yielded more cases (38% of total) with a T790M mutation. A cut-off value of FA ≥0.1% identified patients who responded as well to osimertinib as those identified by cobas assay. This sequential approach should detect additional patients who might benefit from osimertinib treatment.

Clinical application of the Lung Cancer Compact PanelTM using various types of cytological specimens in patients with lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The Lung Cancer Compact PanelTM (compact panel) is a gene panel that can detect driver alterations with high sensitivity in liquid samples, including tumor cells. This study examined the ability of a compact panel to detect genetic mutations in liquid specimens used in clinical practice.

METHODS

Three cohorts, bronchoscopic biopsy forceps washing (washing cohort), pleural effusion (pleural cohort), and spinal fluid (spinal cohort), were analyzed using the compact panel. Liquid samples were added into the GM (Genemetrics) tubes and analyzed. The washing cohort assessed the concordance rate of gene panel analysis outcomes in tissue specimens derived from the primary tumor. Meanwhile, the pleural cohort investigated the impact of storing specimens for 8 weeks and more on nucleic acid and mutation detection rates.

RESULTS

In the washing cohort (n = 79), the concordance rate with mutations detected in tissues was 75/79 (94.9 %). This rate reached 100 % when focusing solely on driver alterations for treatment. The pleural cohort (n = 8) showed no deterioration in nucleic acid quality or quantity after 8 weeks of storage in GM tubes. Similarly, in the spinal cohort (n = 9), spinal fluid with malignant cells exhibited driver alterations similar to those in the primary tumor. These findings underscore the efficacy of the compact panel in accurately identifying genetic mutations in different liquid specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

The compact panel is a reliable tool for detecting driver alterations in various cytological specimens. Its consistent performance across diverse sample types emphasizes its potential for guiding targeted therapies for patients with lung cancer and enhancing precision medicine approaches.

Highly Selective, Single-Tube Colorimetric Assay for Detection of Multiple Mutations in the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene

Many closed-tube methods are designed to detect DNA biomarkers. However, the utility of biomarkers such as a DNA mutation related to personalized medicine is limited as the operation of expensive detection instruments requires well-trained technicians. Therefore, we developed a simple and cheap colorimetric assay based on aggregation of silica-gold nanoparticle-modified probes, with linking probes, to detect mutations. This method consists of target amplification, sequence identification, and aggregation of the silica-gold nanoparticle-modified probes. All reactions are controlled by one individual and proceed sequentially, in a single tube, with no manual intervention. Approximately 10 copies of target DNA were detected with this assay, using 12 hot-spot mutations in exon 19 of EGFR gene as the example. In artificial samples, 0.1% mutant DNA can be distinguished from wild-type genomic DNA. The technology was tested on 104 clinical samples, which included 29 samples that were positive for an exon 19 deletion. The data were consistent with amplification refractory mutation system PCR, with the exception of one weakly positive sample, which was confirmed to be positive by digital PCR. The limit of detection of this colorimetric assay was verified to be better than that of amplification refractory mutation system PCR, and it provides a tool to discriminate multiple mutations in EGFR gene in clinical samples.

[New update to the guidelines on testing predictive biomarkers in non-small-cell lung cancer: a National Consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology]

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) presents the greatest number of identified therapeutic targets, some of which have therapeutic utility. Currently, detecting EGFR, BRAF, KRAS and MET mutations, ALK, ROS1, NTRK and RET translocations, and PD-L1 expression in these patients is considered essential. The use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) facilitates precise molecular diagnosis and allows the detection of other emerging mutations, such as the HER2 mutation and predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy responses. In this consensus, a group of experts in the diagnosis and treatment of NSCLC selected by the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) have evaluated currently available information and propose a series of recommendations to optimize the detection and use of biomarkers in daily clinical practice.

New update to the guidelines on testing predictive biomarkers in non-small-cell lung cancer: a National Consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) presents the greatest number of identified therapeutic targets, some of which have therapeutic utility. Currently, detecting EGFR, BRAF, KRAS and MET mutations, ALK, ROS1, NTRK and RET translocations, and PD-L1 expression in these patients is considered essential. The use of next-generation sequencing facilitates precise molecular diagnosis and allows the detection of other emerging mutations, such as the HER2 mutation and predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy responses. In this consensus, a group of experts in the diagnosis and treatment of NSCLC selected by the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology have evaluated currently available information and propose a series of recommendations to optimize the detection and use of biomarkers in daily clinical practice.

Cytologic Investigations for the Diagnosis of Malignant Pleural Effusion in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: State-of-the-art Review for Pulmonologists

Lung cancer is the current leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and malignant pleural effusion, an indicator of the advanced stage of this disease, portends a poor prognosis. Thus, making an accurate diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion is of paramount importance. During the past decade, the prognosis of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer has improved substantially, especially in those treated with targeted therapy and immunotherapy. The use of pleural fluid cytology should not only provide diagnoses but also aid in the selection of targeted therapies, especially when obtaining a histologic specimen is too difficult. In this evidence-based review, we address the importance of pleural fluid cytology in non-small cell lung cancer patients, from making the diagnosis to making treatment-related decisions when only pleural fluid is available.