Clinical, Operative, and Economic Outcomes of the Point-of-Care Blood Gases in the Nephrology Department of a Third-Level Hospital

Uso de glucómetros durante la prueba de tolerancia oral a la glucosa en niños para el diagnóstico de prediabetes y diabetes. Estudio comparativo

Objetivos

A pesar de que las guías clínicas aún no recomiendan el uso de glucómetros en el lugar de asistencia al paciente (POCT) con fines diagnósticos, la prestación analítica de estos dispositivos ha mejorado significativamente. En este contexto, evaluamos la precisión analítica y la concordancia diagnóstica de los glucómetros POCT durante la prueba de tolerancia oral a la glucosa (PTOG), para el diagnóstico de prediabetes y diabetes en un estudio comparativo.

Métodos

En este estudio prospectivo observacional, fueron reclutados pacientes pediátricos con indicación de PTOG, derivados a la Unidad de Diabetes entre diciembre de 2020 y septiembre de 2021. Durante la prueba funcional, se midió la glucemia en sangre venosa con dos glucómetros POCT (uno con conectividad y otro sin conectividad) y en el laboratorio central.

Resultados

El estudio incluyó 98 pacientes. Observamos una elevada correlación entre los glucómetros y el laboratorio (coeficiente de Pearson=0,912 para el glucómetro sin conectividad y 0,950 para el glucómetro con conectividad). El tiempo de respuesta de la PTOG disminuyó significativamente (mediana glucómetro con conectividad: 2,02 horas [rango intercuartílico: 2,00–2,07], laboratorio: 11,63 horas [6,09–25,80]), con un coste global similar. La concordancia diagnóstica entre el glucómetro con conectividad y el laboratorio fue del 71,1 % (IC 95 % 61,5–79,2). La decisión clínica hubiera sido la misma en el 92,8 % de los casos, aunque no se habría indicado tratamiento en cuatro pacientes (4,1 %).

Conclusiones

Durante las PTOG, los glucómetros POCT muestran una elevada correlación y una concordancia diagnóstica aceptable con el laboratorio, ofreciendo además el glucómetro con conectividad una reducción significativa del tiempo de respuesta, sin incrementar los costes. No obstante, dado que en algún caso podría haber un impacto clínico grave, los glucómetros POCT aún no deben ser utilizados con fines diagnósticos.

Use of point-of-care glucometers during an oral glucose tolerance test in children for prediabetes and diabetes diagnosis: a comparison study

Objectives

Despite clinical guidelines do not recommend the use of point-of-care testing (POCT) glucometers for diagnostic purposes yet, the analytical performance is continuously improving. Thus, we evaluate the technical accuracy and clinical concordance of POCT glucometers during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in children for prediabetes and diabetes diagnosis in a comparison study.

Methods

Pediatric patients with an OGTT indication who attended the Diabetes Unit between December 2020 and September 2021 were recruited for this prospective observational study. During the functional test, glycaemia was immediately measured in venous blood using two glucometers (unconnected and connected) and sent to the central laboratory.

Results

The study included 98 patients. There was a high correlation between the glucometers and the central laboratory (Pearson correlation coefficient=0.912 and 0.950, for unconnected and connected glucometer, respectively). The median OGTT turnaround time (TAT) was significantly decreased (connected glucometer: 2.02 h [interquartile range, 2.00-2.07], central laboratory: 11.63 h [6.09-25.80]), with similar overall cost. The diagnostic concordance between connected glucometer and the central laboratory was 71.1 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 61.5-79.2). The clinical decision would have been the same in the 92.8 % of the cases, but treatment would have not been indicated in 4 patients (4.1 %).

Conclusions

POCT glucometers have demonstrated a high correlation and an acceptable diagnostic concordance with the central laboratory during an OGTT, as well the connected device offers a significant decrease in TAT, without increasing costs. However, as severe clinical impact could happen, POCT glucometers may not be used for diagnosis yet.

Laboratory interpretative comments and guidance: clinical and operative outcomes on moderate to severe hyponatraemia patient management

AIMS

Hyponatraemia is the most common body fluid disorders but often goes unnoticed. Our laboratory incorporated a standardised procedure to help clinicians detect moderate/severe hyponatraemia. The study aims were to evaluate the outcomes on patient care and clinicians' satisfaction.

METHODS

The study, observational and retrospective, included 1839 cases, adult and paediatric patients, with sodium concentration <130 mmol/L. The procedure consisted of interpretative comments in the emergency and core laboratories report and the point-of-care testing blood gas network report. We evaluated hyponatraemia length in two equal periods: before and after the implementation. We conducted a survey addressed to the staff of the clinical settings involved to know their satisfaction.

RESULTS

The median hyponatraemia length decreased significantly from 4.95 hours (2.08-16.57) in the first period to 2.17 hours (1.06-5.39) in the second period. The lack of hyponatraemia patients follow-up was significantly less after the procedure implementation. The survey was answered by 92 (60 senior specialists and 32 residents) out of 110 clinicians surveyed. Ninety of them (98%) answered positively.

CONCLUSIONS

We have demonstrated the reduction in the time for diagnosing and management by physicians, the higher uniformity in the time required to solve hyponatraemia episodes following our laboratory procedure and the clinicians' satisfaction.