Uncommon Benign Neoplasms and Pseudotumors of the Liver

Lobar and Segmental Atrophy of the Liver: Differential Diagnoses and Treatments

Segmental or lobar liver atrophy is a common but not well-understood clinical condition. Hepatic atrophy can be classified into hepatic atrophy secondary to other pathologies and primary segmental hepatic atrophy, which is a benign intrahepatic lesion (pseudotumor) not associated with any other pathology. The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying atrophy can be divided into three main situations: obstruction of biliary outflow, obstruction of the systemic venous outflow, and obstruction of incoming portal venous flow. For what may concern secondary hepatic atrophy, there are many pathologies that could underlie this condition, ranging from benign to intrahepatic malignancies, with particular reference to particularly hepatocellular carcinoma and biliary duct carcinoma. An accurate and prompt differential diagnosis between the various forms and causes of atrophy is important for early identification and adequate treatment of underlying pathologies. A comprehensive review of the literature on the etiology and the radiological and histological characteristics of different types of hepatic atrophy is currently unavailable. Therefore, the aim of this review is to summarize the primary and secondary causes of segmental or lobar liver atrophy (excluding forms involving the entire liver parenchyma) and to provide practical tools for clinical and radiological differential diagnosis.

Mimickers of immunoglobulin G4-related hepatobiliary disease on biopsy

With the growing recognition of IgG4-related hepatobiliary disease, establishing a definitive diagnosis relies mainly on a combination of clinical findings, serological markers, and imaging modalities. However, the role of histopathological evaluation remains indispensable, particularly in cases necessitating differential diagnosis or malignancy exclusion. While diagnosing IgG4-related hepatobiliary disease through surgical resection specimens is often straightforward, pathologists encounter substantial challenges when evaluating biopsies. The increasing rarity of surgical interventions exacerbates this due to improved disease recognition and suspicion. Numerous confounding factors, including the absence of the characteristic histologic features, limited tissue sample size, biopsy artifacts, and the limited value of IgG4 counts, further complicate the diagnostic process. Additionally, many other disorders exhibit clinical and histological features that overlap with IgG4-related disease, intensifying the complexity of interpreting biopsy specimens. This article explores the clinical and histomorphologic features of IgG4-related hepatobiliary disease and its potential mimickers. It offers valuable insights for pathologists and clinicians when confronted with biopsy specimens from hepatobiliary organs.

A Pattern-Based Approach to Hepatic Infections

The evaluation of liver biopsies for infection can be a challenging and frustrating situation for diagnostic pathologists as well as clinicians. Patients often present with nonspecific symptoms, such as fever and elevated transaminases, leading to a broad differential diagnosis that typically includes malignancy and noninfectious inflammatory diseases in addition to infections. A pattern-based histologic approach can be extremely helpful in both making a diagnosis and guiding the next steps for the evaluation of the pathology specimen as well as the patient. This review discusses several of the more commonly encountered histologic patterns associated with hepatic infectious diseases, the most common pathogens with which they are associated, and helpful ancillary studies.