Peng X, Liu J. The relationship between household income and prognosis of patients with cervical adenocarcinoma in the United States: A retrospective cohort study based on the SEER database.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024;
50:108516. [PMID:
38968853 DOI:
10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108516]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2024] [Revised: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the association between household income and overall survival (OS) of patients with cervical adenocarcinoma.
METHODS
We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving participants selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Data were collected on various variables, including demographic variables such as median household income and clinicopathological characteristics for all participants. Cox regression analysis was utilized to examine the association between household income and OS. Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and E-value were used to further confirm the association.
RESULTS
A total of 2217 patients were included in the study. Compared with low-income (<$35,000-$54,999), middle-income (55,000-$69,999) or high-income (≥$70,000) was significantly associated with a higher 5-year OS (70.8 %, 58.7 % vs 50 %) in patients with cervical adenocarcinoma. The HR was 0.49, 95 % CI 0.41-0.58, p < 0.001 and 0.66 (0.55-0.78), p < 0.001 respectively, in the unadjusted model. After adjustment for potential confounders, the results were similar (adjusted HR 0.54 (0.45-0.65), p < 0.001) and 0.79 (0.66-0.94), p = 0.01), respectively. This significant association was also present in the various adjusted models. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses suggested that the relationship remained robust and reliable. The E-value analysis indicated robustness to unmeasured confounding. There was evidence of an interaction between age at diagnosis, race, primary site, tumor grade, T, N, M, or Scope Reg LN Sur, and household income on increasing the 5-year OS of cervical adenocarcinoma.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study found that middle or high household income was significantly associated with a better 5-year OS compared with low household income in patients with cervical adenocarcinoma.
Collapse