Valproic Acid and topiramate induced hyperammonemic encephalopathy in a patient with normal serum carnitine

[Valproic acid-induced hyperammonemic encephalopathy in a patient receiving valproic acid monotherapy]

A 79-year-old female was diagnosed with epilepsy because she experienced loss of consciousness twice in January and February and then had a seizure in June 2016. She was treated with 800 mg sodium valproate (sustained release). After 3 days, she experienced loss of appetite, and more than 3 days later, disturbance of consciousness. Serum valproic acid (VPA) concentration was 128.3 μg/ml and serum ammonia was 404 μmol/l. Cerebral edema and status epilepticus occurred. Severe neurological dysfunction remained, even after treatment with continuous hemodiafiltration and levocarnitine. VPA is widely used for the treatment of generalized epilepsy. VPA-induced hyperammonemic encephalopathy is a rare but serious adverse event of VPA. Thus, we must pay attention to serum ammonia levels when using VPA, even VPA monotherapy.

Topiramate-Related Hyperammonemia

Objective: To report a case of hyperammonemia associated with the interaction between topiramate and valproic acid. Case Summary: We present a patient case with topiramate-related hyperammonemia. The patient was on topiramate prior to admission and presented with an elevated ammonia level following 2 doses of valproic acid. The increased dosing frequency of valproic acid further exacerbated the hyperammonemia. On discontinuation of topiramate and the tapering of the dose of valproic acid the patient's ammonia level returned to normal. Discussion: Valproic acid-induced hyperammonemic encephalopathy is well documented and there are several proposed mechanisms. The interaction between valproic acid and topiramate causing drug-induced hyperammonemia encephalopathy is documented in several case reports. The interaction is associated with the addition of topiramate to a patient's medication regimen that previously included valproic acid. Topiramate also has several proposed mechanisms for predisposing patients for hyperammonemia. There are limited data on topiramate monotherapy or long-term use of topiramate use causing hyperammonemia-associated encephalopathy or enhancing hyperammonemia with the addition of valproic acid. Conclusions: This case supports topiramate-related hyperammonemia and the pharmacodynamic interaction with the co-administration of valproic acid.

Topiramate-induced hyperammonemic encephalopathy in a patient with mental retardation: A case report and review of the literature

Hyperammonemia is an uncommon side effect of topiramate (TPM) that has only been reported when it is used as an adjunct to valproate. We report a patient with mental retardation who developed reversible encephalopathy from TPM. Ammonia level was monitored during the course of TPM treatment. This patient had recurring, reversible elevations in serum ammonia levels that coincided with the administration of TPM. To our knowledge, symptomatic hyperammonemia has not been reported to occur with TPM monotherapy.

Unusual cause of hyperammonemia in two cases with short-term and long-term valproate therapy successfully treated by single dose carglumic acid

Valproic acid (VPA) is an antiepileptic drug which is used in the treatment of various seizure disorders including tonic-clonic, myoclonic, absence, partial seizures and psychiatric disorders. VPA is usually well tolerated, but severe adverse effects may occur. Hyperammonaemic encephalopathy (HE) is a rare and potentially fatal complication of VPA treatment. The mechanism by which valproate induces hyperammonemia remains incompletely understood but is likely to relate to the urea cycle. Herein we present two cases with valproate-induced hyperammonemia at therapeutic valproate levels without signs of liver failure and were successfully treated by a single dose of carglumic acid.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous valproate for status epilepticus: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The effectiveness of valproate (VPA) in the treatment of focal and generalized epilepsies is well established. The drug has a wide spectrum of action, good tolerability, and has been available as an injectable formulation since 1993. Despite the lack of class A evidence, it has been used extensively in various forms of status epilepticus (SE).

AIM

Our aim was to present a systematic review of data from randomized and non-randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous VPA for the treatment of SE.

METHODS

Data sources included MEDLINE, back tracing of references in pertinent studies, and contact with the manufacturer of VPA (Sanofi-Aventis).

RESULTS

Overall, the search strategy yielded 433 results (425 MEDLINE, seven congress abstracts, one unpublished study); after excluding duplicate publications and case reports, 30 studies were identified (the earliest was published in 1993, the most recent in 2012); ten were controlled (six randomized controlled trials, four non-randomized controlled studies), and 20 uncontrolled trials (eight prospective observational studies, 12 retrospective case series). The cumulative literature describes the experiences of 860 patients with various forms of SE treated with intravenous VPA. The overall response rate to abrogate SE was 70.9% (601/848; 95% confidence interval [CI] 67.8-73.9). Response rates to intravenous VPA were better in children than in adults and did not differ between the SE types. The most commonly reported effective doses were between 15 and 45 mg/kg in bolus (6 mg/kg/min) followed by 1-3 mg/kg/h infusion. Safety studies of intravenous VPA administration in patients with SE showed a low incidence of adverse events overall (<10%), mainly dizziness, thrombocytopenia, and mild hypotension, which was independent of infusion rates. Of note, good cardiovascular and respiratory tolerability was observed in these studies, even at high doses and fast infusion rates (up to 30 mg/kg at 10 mg/kg/min), despite multiple morbidities or other antiepileptic drugs. The most serious concern relates to the possibility of acute encephalopathy, sometimes related to hepatic abnormalities or hyperammonemia.

CONCLUSIONS

The published experience is consistent with VPA being a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients with established SE who have previously failed conventional first-line treatment with benzodiazepines, but high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to inform clinicians on its comparative effectiveness in SE.