Contralateral canes for knee osteoarthritis

Rehabilitation interventions in osteoarthritis

The goals of the management of osteoarthritis (OA) are to relieve joint pain and stiffness, maintain or increase joint mobility and stability, improve activities and participation, and enhance quality of life. The first step in the management is to make a comprehensive holistic assessment to understand the impact of the disease on the individual. Then, an individualized management plan can be set via a shared-decision making process between the patient and the clinician taking into account all components of functioning affected by the disease. Rehabilitation interventions serve as the basis of OA management whereas pharmacological modalities are usually administered for additional symptom control. This study aimed to overview the rehabilitation interventions used for people with OA with an update of the recent evidence. First, core management approaches that include patient education, physical activity and exercises, and weight loss were addressed; then adjunctive treatments including biomechanical interventions (e.g. orthoses, assistive devices) and physical modalities were overviewed.

Analysis of Clinical Efficacy of Clearing Heat and Dispelling Paralysis Soup in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee Joint and Its Effect on Patients' Motor Function

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of clearing heat and dispelling paralysis soup for osteoarthritis of the knee joint on the motor function of the knee joint and the level of inflammation of the organism in patients.

METHODS

One hundred and sixteen patients with knee osteoarthritis admitted from January 2020 to May 2021 were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups, 58 cases in the control group were treated with loxoprofen sodium dispersible tablets, and 58 cases in the experimental group were treated with Qinghe dispel paralysis soup on the basis of the control group and the patients' balance ability analysis, gait parameter change analysis, VAS, JOA, AIMS2-SF scale assessment, and serum index. The treatment effects of the two treatment regimens were analyzed by testing.

RESULTS

The anterior-posterior axis, left-right axis, A2-A6, A4-A8, and circumferential axis of the experimental group were lower than those of the control group after treatment (P < 0.05); the step length of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group after treatment (P < 0.05), and there were no significant differences in step speed, double-support phase, and step width (P > 0.05), but both groups improved significantly compared with those before treatment (P < 0.05); the VAS score of the experimental group was lower than that of the control group after treatment. The VAS scores of the experimental group were lower than those of the control group, and the scores of JOA and AIMS2-SF were higher than those of the control group (P < 0.05); the levels of TIMP-1 in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group, and the levels of TNF-α, TLR4, MMP-3, and IL-1 were lower than those in the control group after treatment (P < 0.05); there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups during treatment (P > 0.05), and the efficiency of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Combined treatment with Qinghe dispel paralysis soup can better promote the recovery of balance, improve motor ability, and reduce the development of inflammation in the organism, with high safety and effectiveness.