1
|
Zolotareva D, Zazybin A, Belyankova Y, Dauletbakov A, Tursynbek S, Rafikova K, Ten A, Yu V, Bayazit S, Basharimova A, Aydemir M. Increasing Sugar Content in Source for Biofuel Production Using Agrochemical and Genetic Approaches at the Stages of BioMass Preharvesting and Harvesting. Molecules 2022; 27:molecules27165210. [PMID: 36014450 PMCID: PMC9416125 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27165210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
In order to optimize biofuel (including bioethanol) production processes, various problems need to be solved, such as increasing the sugar content of raw materials/biomass to gain a higher yield of the product. This task can be solved in several ways, with their own advantages and disadvantages, and an integrated approach, such as using a combination of ripening agents and phytohormones or application of a superabsorbent polymer with at least one sugar-enhancing agent, can be applied as well. Here, we reviewed several methods, including pre- and postharvest factors (light, temperature, partial replacement of potassium with magnesium, etc.), genetic modifications (traditional breeding, phytohormones, etc.), chemical ripening methods (Ethephon, Moddus, etc.), and some alternative methods (DMSO treatment, ionic liquids, etc.). The aim of this review was to provide a comprehensive, up-to-date summary of methods of increasing the carbohydrate level in plants/biomass for bioethanol production.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darya Zolotareva
- School of Chemical Engineering, Kazakh-British Technical University, Tole bi Street 59, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan
- Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Institute of Oil and Gas Geology, Satbayev University, Almaty 050013, Kazakhstan
| | - Alexey Zazybin
- School of Chemical Engineering, Kazakh-British Technical University, Tole bi Street 59, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan
- Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Institute of Oil and Gas Geology, Satbayev University, Almaty 050013, Kazakhstan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +7-705-293-0778
| | - Yelizaveta Belyankova
- School of Chemical Engineering, Kazakh-British Technical University, Tole bi Street 59, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan
- Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Institute of Oil and Gas Geology, Satbayev University, Almaty 050013, Kazakhstan
| | - Anuar Dauletbakov
- School of Chemical Engineering, Kazakh-British Technical University, Tole bi Street 59, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan
- Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Institute of Oil and Gas Geology, Satbayev University, Almaty 050013, Kazakhstan
| | - Saniya Tursynbek
- School of Chemical Engineering, Kazakh-British Technical University, Tole bi Street 59, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan
| | - Khadichahan Rafikova
- Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Institute of Oil and Gas Geology, Satbayev University, Almaty 050013, Kazakhstan
| | - Assel Ten
- School of Chemical Engineering, Kazakh-British Technical University, Tole bi Street 59, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan
- Laboratory of Synthetic and Natural Medicinal Compounds Chemistry, A. B. Bekturov Institute of Chemical Sciences, Sh. Ualikhanov, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan
| | - Valentina Yu
- School of Chemical Engineering, Kazakh-British Technical University, Tole bi Street 59, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan
- Laboratory of Synthetic and Natural Medicinal Compounds Chemistry, A. B. Bekturov Institute of Chemical Sciences, Sh. Ualikhanov, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan
| | - Sarah Bayazit
- School of Chemical Engineering, Kazakh-British Technical University, Tole bi Street 59, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan
| | - Anna Basharimova
- School of Chemical Engineering, Kazakh-British Technical University, Tole bi Street 59, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan
| | - Murat Aydemir
- Department of Chemistry, Dicle University, Diyarbakır 21280, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Almeida Silva M, Espinoza Véliz JG, Pereira Sartori MM, Luiz Santos H. Glyphosate applied at a hormetic dose improves ripening without impairing sugarcane productivity and ratoon sprouting. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2022; 806:150503. [PMID: 34600204 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The management of sugarcane ripening is essential to ensuring the supply of high-quality raw material for the sugar-alcohol industry; chemical ripeners are frequently used to accelerate sucrose accumulation in the stalks during harvesting. The potential ripening effect of a low dose of glyphosate was evaluated in sugarcane, along with its impact on productivity and sprouting in the next crop cycle. A field experiment was conducted in 2015 and 2016 using a randomized block design with eight replicates in a split-plot scheme, with the following treatments: (1) control with only water application, (2) glyphosate at a low dose of 1.8 g a.e. ha-1 (corresponding to 0.005 L ha-1 of the commercial product (cp)), and (3) glyphosate at the commercially recommended dose for a ripener at 180 g a.e. ha-1 (corresponding to 0.50 L ha-1 of the cp) applied at 60, 45, 30, and 15 days before harvest (DBH). The harvest was performed on May 25, 2016 (0 DBH), and a total of five periods were evaluated. This study showed that the application of a hormetic dose of glyphosate to stimulate sugarcane ripening is promising, despite the limited duration of the effect. The application of the hormetic dose (1.8 g a.e. ha-1) at 30 DBH improved the technological quality of sugarcane in terms of Brix% juice, pol% cane, purity% juice, moisture% cane, reducing sugars, total reducing sugars, and total recoverable sugar. Additionally, it increased pol productivity, and did not affect ratoon sprouting in the subsequent cycle. Thus, this study provides a strategy for ripening management with a low environmental impact for sugarcane producers through a low (hormetic) dose of glyphosate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelo de Almeida Silva
- Laboratory of Ecophysiology Applied to Agriculture (LECA), School of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
| | | | - Maria Márcia Pereira Sartori
- Laboratory of Ecophysiology Applied to Agriculture (LECA), School of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil
| | - Hariane Luiz Santos
- Laboratory of Ecophysiology Applied to Agriculture (LECA), School of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pincelli-Souza RP, Bortolheiro FP, Carbonari CA, Velini ED, Silva MDA. Hormetic effect of glyphosate persists during the entire growth period and increases sugarcane yield. PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE 2020; 76:2388-2394. [PMID: 32027082 DOI: 10.1002/ps.5775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Revised: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 02/06/2020] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stimulation of plant growth by low doses of a toxic compound is defined as a hormetic effect. Exposure of plants to low doses of glyphosate can cause stimulatory effects on growth or other variables. Sugarcane is the major biofuel and sugar-production crop cultivated in Brazil, but its expansion to new areas is limited; therefore, there is a demand for new technologies to improve sugarcane production per unit area. The use of pesticides to stimulate growth through the hormetic effect might be a suitable strategy to increase sugarcane yields. The purpose of this research was to investigate the effect of a low dose of glyphosate on metabolic compound accumulation, leaf phosphorus (P) concentration, and morphological variables across a one-year sugarcane cycle, as well as to determine whether the glyphosate effect was sustained and effective in improving the yield and technological quality of the sugarcane at harvest. RESULTS The application of a low dose of glyphosate led to higher concentrations of shikimic acid and quinic acid, higher leaf P concentrations, and improved plant growth, yield, and technological quality of the sugarcane, by increasing the Brix% juice, pol% cane, total recoverable sugar, tons of culms per hectare, and tons of pol per hectare, relative to the results for an untreated control. CONCLUSIONS The increased growth stimuli, observed through several variables, promoted an improvement in sugarcane yield. Therefore, the application of a low dose of glyphosate to sugarcane is a promising practice for crop management. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fernanda Pap Bortolheiro
- School of Agricultural Sciences, Laboratory of Ecophysiology Applied to Agriculture, Department of Crop Production and Breeding, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil
| | - Caio A Carbonari
- School of Agricultural Sciences, Laboratory of Weed Science, Department of Crop Production and Breeding, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil
| | - Edivaldo D Velini
- School of Agricultural Sciences, Laboratory of Weed Science, Department of Crop Production and Breeding, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil
| | - Marcelo de A Silva
- School of Agricultural Sciences, Laboratory of Ecophysiology Applied to Agriculture, Department of Crop Production and Breeding, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|