Pain assessment during blood collection from sedated and mechanically ventilated children

Assessment of pain management adequacy among hospitalized pediatric patients: institutional-based cross-sectional study

Background

As the evidence showed, despite the magnitude of the effects that pain can have on a child, it is often inadequately assessed and treated. However, whether pain is adequately treated or not, evidence is lacking in the study setting.

Objectives

This study assessed pain management adequacy among hospitalized pediatric patients at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia.

Methods

An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted among pediatric patients admitted to the University of Gondar Comprehensive and Specialized Hospital between June and August 2021. Eligible patients were enrolled in the study using consecutive sampling techniques. Data were collected using a structured interview-based questionnaire and a review of the patient's medical records that were prepared after reviewing earlier studies. Pain management adequacy was determined using the pain management index (PMI) score. Statistical Software for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22 was used for data entry and analysis. Descriptive statistics such as frequencies, percentages, and means with standard deviation were used to describe the respective variables. Logistic regression was used to assess predictor variables of pain management adequacy. A p-value <0.05 at a 95% CI was considered statistically significant.

Results

Of the 422 participants enrolled in the study, most (58.1%) were males, with a mean age of 3.9 ± 0.8 years. Pain medication was prescribed to 62.8% (95% CI: 57.3-68.2) of the participants. About 63.3% (95% CI: 58.8%-68%) received inadequate analgesics. The type of painkillers administered also did not match the severity of the pain. Pediatric patients less than 1 month and between 1 month and 1 year (AOR = 2.891, 95% CI: 1.274-12.899 and AOR = 2.657, 95% CI: 1.350-5.175), respectively, and patients with severe and moderate levels of pain (AOR = 3.448, 95% CI: 1.902-6.251 and AOR = 5.345, 95% CI: 1.956-9.828), respectively, were found to have inadequate pain medication compared with their counterparts.

Conclusion

This study revealed that pain was hardly managed based on its severity. Overall, two-thirds of pediatric patients received inadequate pain medication. This indicates majority of patients experienced pain did not manage appropriately.

Non-Invasive Objective Markers to Measure Pain: A Direction to Develop a Pain Device - A Narrative Review

Objective

To review the literature regarding non-invasive objective measurements of pain. Measuring pain is of uttermost importance, but it can be an inconvenient task, especially in terms of the interpretation of patient's information. Reiterating, there is no "standard" that provides the physician with a method to objectively quantify this problem of patient's pain. For assessing the pain, physician relies solely on unidimensional assessment tools or questionnaire-based pain assessment. Although pain is a subjective experience of the patient, but there is a need to measure pain sometimes in the individuals who cannot communicate their quality and severity of pain.

Material and Methods

The articles from PubMed and Google Scholar without any year and age limit were searched in the current narrative review. A total of 16 markers were searched and their relation to pain was studied.

Results

Studies have shown that these markers change in relation to pain and it can be considered a valuable tool for pain measurement but there are multiple factors like psychological and emotional factors which affect these markers.

Conclusion

There is lack of evidence to show which marker can be used for measuring pain accurately. This narrative review is an attempt to look into the various pain-related markers that can be used and it calls for further studies including clinical trials with different diseases and taking into accounts different factors affecting pain to give an accurate measurement of pain.

2022 Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines on Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation, Neuromuscular Blockade, and Delirium in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients With Consideration of the ICU Environment and Early Mobility

RATIONALE

A guideline that both evaluates current practice and provides recommendations to address sedation, pain, and delirium management with regard for neuromuscular blockade and withdrawal is not currently available.

OBJECTIVE

To develop comprehensive clinical practice guidelines for critically ill infants and children, with specific attention to seven domains of care including pain, sedation/agitation, iatrogenic withdrawal, neuromuscular blockade, delirium, PICU environment, and early mobility.

DESIGN

The Society of Critical Care Medicine Pediatric Pain, Agitation, Neuromuscular Blockade, and Delirium in critically ill pediatric patients with consideration of the PICU Environment and Early Mobility Guideline Taskforce was comprised of 29 national experts who collaborated from 2009 to 2021 via teleconference and/or e-mail at least monthly for planning, literature review, and guideline development, revision, and approval. The full taskforce gathered annually in-person during the Society of Critical Care Medicine Congress for progress reports and further strategizing with the final face-to-face meeting occurring in February 2020. Throughout this process, the Society of Critical Care Medicine standard operating procedures Manual for Guidelines development was adhered to.

METHODS

Taskforce content experts separated into subgroups addressing pain/analgesia, sedation, tolerance/iatrogenic withdrawal, neuromuscular blockade, delirium, PICU environment (family presence and sleep hygiene), and early mobility. Subgroups created descriptive and actionable Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome questions. An experienced medical information specialist developed search strategies to identify relevant literature between January 1990 and January 2020. Subgroups reviewed literature, determined quality of evidence, and formulated recommendations classified as "strong" with "we recommend" or "conditional" with "we suggest." Good practice statements were used when indirect evidence supported benefit with no or minimal risk. Evidence gaps were noted. Initial recommendations were reviewed by each subgroup and revised as deemed necessary prior to being disseminated for voting by the full taskforce. Individuals who had an overt or potential conflict of interest abstained from relevant votes. Expert opinion alone was not used in substitution for a lack of evidence.

RESULTS

The Pediatric Pain, Agitation, Neuromuscular Blockade, and Delirium in critically ill pediatric patients with consideration of the PICU Environment and Early Mobility taskforce issued 44 recommendations (14 strong and 30 conditional) and five good practice statements.

CONCLUSIONS

The current guidelines represent a comprehensive list of practical clinical recommendations for the assessment, prevention, and management of key aspects for the comprehensive critical care of infants and children. Main areas of focus included 1) need for the routine monitoring of pain, agitation, withdrawal, and delirium using validated tools, 2) enhanced use of protocolized sedation and analgesia, and 3) recognition of the importance of nonpharmacologic interventions for enhancing patient comfort and comprehensive care provision.

Effects of virtual reality on relieving postoperative pain in surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain is a prevalent problem leading to many adverse outcomes in surgical patients. Virtual reality (VR) is an emerging non-pharmacological method of postoperative pain relief, but the effects of it are not clear. This review aimed to explore the effects of VR on relieving postoperative pain.

METHODS

Studies published up to November 2019 were identified by searching the PubMed (Medline), Embase, Web of Science, and other databases. Meta-analyses were conducted to compare VR and usual care for relieving postoperative pain. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were performed to explain the heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Overall, 8 randomized control trials (RCTs) enrolling 723 participants were included. Our results demonstrated that the patients receiving the VR intervention had lower postoperative pain scores than those receiving the usual care (mean difference [MD] -0.64; 95% CI -1.05 to -0.22; P = 0.002). One subgroup analysis revealed that VR could relieve postoperative pain both in minor surgery (MD -1.48; 95% CI -2.02 to -0.95; P < 0.0001) and major surgery (MD -0.32; 95% CI -0.53 to -0.11; P < 0.03). Another subgroup analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in postoperative pain among patients receiving VR during the intraoperative (MD -1.51; 95% CI -2.04 to -0.97; P < 0.00001) and the postoperative periods (MD -0.50; 95% CI -0.76 to -0.24; P = 0.002). However, there was no significant postoperative pain relief when receiving VR during the preoperative period. Additionally, significant improvements in postoperative satisfaction were reported in two studies. However, another two studies included found that VR could not affect physiological parameters related to pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Applying VR can relieve postoperative pain effectively. The type of surgery and timing of using VR are the main sources of heterogeneity. More rigorous studies about the relationship between VR and postoperative pain relief will be needed.