How to discuss about do-not-resuscitate in the intensive care unit?

A Retrospective Analysis of Characteristics Favouring In-Hospital Resuscitation Plan Completion, Their Timing, and Associated Outcomes

Background: Comprehensive resuscitation plans document treatment recommendations, such as 'Not for cardiopulmonary resuscitation'. When created early in admission as a shared decision-making process, these plans support patient autonomy and guide future treatment. The characteristics of patients who have resuscitation plans documented, their timing, and associations with clinical outcomes remain unclear. Objectives: To characterise factors associated with resuscitation plan completion, early completion, and differences in mortality rates and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admissions based on resuscitation plan status. Methods: This retrospective study analysed non-elective admissions to an Australian tertiary centre from January to June 2021, examining plan completion timing (early < 48 h, late > 48 h) and associations with mortality and ICU admission. Results: Of 13,718 admissions, 5745 (42%) had a resuscitation plan recorded. Most plans (89%) were completed early. Furthermore, 9% of patients died during admission, and 8.2% were admitted to the ICU. For those without resuscitation plans, 0.5% died (p < 0.001), and 9.7% were admitted to the ICU (p = 0.002). Factors associated with plan completion included a medical unit, in-hours admission, older age, female gender, limited English proficiency, and non-Indigenous status. Plans completed late (>48 h) correlated with a higher mortality (14% vs. 9%; p < 0.001) and more ICU admissions (25% vs. 6%; p < 0.001). Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander patients were often overlooked for resuscitation documentation before death. No resuscitation plans were documented for 62% of ICU admissions. Conclusions: Important disparities exist in resuscitation plan completion rates across highly relevant inpatient and demographic groups.

Treatment of patients with 'do not intubate orders'

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Do-not-intubate (DNI) orders are more frequently encountered over time. This widespread diffusion of DNI orders make it essential to develop therapeutic strategies matching patient's and his family willingness. The present review sheds light on the therapeutic approaches employed to support respiratory function of patients with DNI orders.

RECENT FINDINGS

In DNI patients, several approaches have been described to relieve dyspnoea and address acute respiratory failure (ARF). Despite its extensive use, supplemental oxygen is not so useful in assuring dyspnoea relief. Noninvasive respiratory support (NIRS) is frequently employed to treat ARF in DNI patients. Also, to enhance DNI patients comfort during NIRS, it is worthy to point out the role of analgo-sedative medications. Lastly, a particular aspect concerns the first waves of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, when DNI orders have been pursued on factors unrelated to patient's wishes, in the total absence of family support due to the lockdown policy. In this setting, NIRS has been extensively employed in DNI patients with a survival rate of around 20%.

SUMMARY

In dealing with DNI patients, the individualization of treatments is of pivotal importance to respect patient's preferences and improve quality of life at the same time.

Palliative Family Conference Reduces the Risk of Death in Intensive Care Units and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation at End of Life

Background: Palliative family conference (PFC) was included in the reimbursement of National Health Insurance to promote palliative care in Taiwan in 2012. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of PFC on death in intensive care unit (ICU) and receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) within three days before death. Design: This is a cross-sectional study. Subjects: All patients who died in a public hospital and were admitted to ICU within 30 days before death, from 2013 to 2018, were included. Measurements: The medical records were analyzed to identify information on causes of death, receiving PFC, receiving palliative care consultation, death in ICU, and receiving CPR within three days before death. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the independent effects of receiving PFC on the risk of death in ICU and receiving CPR within three days before death. Results: For patients who died and those who did not die in ICU, the proportion of receiving PFC was 45.8% (1818/3973) and 55.0% (808/1468), respectively. For patients who received and those who did not receive CPR within three days before death, the proportion of receiving PFC was 23.9% (140/585) and 51.2% (2486/4856), respectively. PFC was associated with a reduced risk of death in ICU (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.842; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.717-0.988) and a reduced risk of receiving CPR within three days before death (AOR: 0.361; 95% CI: 0.286-0.456). Conclusion: PFC reduces the risk of receiving nonbeneficial aggressive intervention and may improve the quality of end-of-life care.