Cell number considerations for blastocyst transfer in younger patients.
J Assist Reprod Genet 2020;
37:619-627. [PMID:
31901111 DOI:
10.1007/s10815-019-01681-w]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2019] [Accepted: 12/27/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the role of the cell number at day 3 in blastocyst selection.
DESIGN
Observational, retrospective, single-center clinical study.
PATIENT(S)
In part 1, 1211 single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (SVBT) cycles were identified and reviewed. All the cycles were conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles and the first embryo transfer cycles. Most of patients had a risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and were young. In part 2, 864 IVF-derived blastocysts from 292 infertile couples underwent trophectoderm (TE) biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A).
INTERVENTION(S)
No patient intervention.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)
The first part was an analysis of the correlation between the cell number at day 3 and live birth rate (LBR) after SVBT, and the second part was an analysis of the correlation between the cell number at day 3 and euploid rate (ER) of blastocysts.
RESULT(S)
In part 1, after correcting for the effects of other confounders, the cell number at day 3 had no significant effect on the LBR (OR 1.001, 95% CI 0.938-1.068). In part 2, after correcting for the effects of other confounders, the cell number at day 3 had no significant effect on the ER (OR 0.960, 95% CI 0.866-1.063).
CONCLUSION(S)
When the vitrified-warmed blastocysts obtained by conventional IVF are transferred into young patients, the cell number at day 3 is not a strong predictor of the LBR. In addition, the cell number at day 3 is not a strong predictor of ER of IVF-derived blastocysts too.
Collapse