Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases: a Brazilian IVF centre experience

A clinical predictive model for live birth in women of advanced age undergoing PGT cycles

PURPOSE

The trend of delaying childbirth has resulted in a growing number of advanced-aged women who are opting for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) to screen for monogenic diseases or structural chromosomal rearrangements (PGT-M and PGT-SR). This increase in demand necessitates the development of a clinical predictive model for live birth outcomes in these women. Therefore, the objective of this study is to construct a comprehensive predictive model that assesses the likelihood of achieving a successful live birth in advanced-aged women undergoing PGT-M and PGT-SR treatments.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of 37-45-year-old women undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disease or structural chromosomal rearrangement cycles from 2010 to 2021 was conducted at a university hospital reproductive centre. The purpose was to develop a clinical predictive model for live birth in these women. The main outcome studied was the cumulative live birth rate in the first or subsequent cycles. Developing a decision tree enabled a comprehensive study of clinical parameters and expected outcomes.

RESULTS

The analysis included 158 women undergoing 753 preimplantation genetic testing cycles. The cumulative live birth rate was 37.342% (59/158). Decision tree analysis revealed that women aged ≤ 40.1 or women > 40.1 with one or more top-quality transferable embryos in their first cycle had the best chance for a live baby (56% and 41%, respectively). Those older than 40.1 without top-quality embryos and seven or fewer dominant follicles had no live births. A Kaplan-Meier curve showed that for autosomal dominant diseases, there was a negligible increase in live birth rate after three cycles, compared to six cycles in autosomal recessive inheritance.

CONCLUSION

In older women, the chance of delivering after repeated cycles is higher in those with at least one top-quality unaffected embryo in their first preimplantation genetic testing cycle. Additional preimplantation genetic testing cycles after three in carriers of an autosomal dominant disorder and six in those with an autosomal recessive disorder should be considered prudently.

Classification of osteogenesis imperfecta: Importance for prophylaxis and genetic counseling

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a genetically heterogeneous monogenic disease characterized by decreased bone mass, bone fragility, and recurrent fractures. The phenotypic spectrum varies considerably ranging from prenatal fractures with lethal outcomes to mild forms with few fractures and normal stature. The basic mechanism is a collagen-related defect, not only in synthesis but also in folding, processing, bone mineralization, or osteoblast function. In recent years, great progress has been made in identifying new genes and molecular mechanisms underlying OI. In this context, the classification of OI has been revised several times and different types are used. The Sillence classification, based on clinical and radiological characteristics, is currently used as a grading of clinical severity. Based on the metabolic pathway, the functional classification allows identifying regulatory elements and targeting specific therapeutic approaches. Genetic classification has the advantage of identifying the inheritance pattern, an essential element for genetic counseling and prophylaxis. Although genotype-phenotype correlations may sometimes be challenging, genetic diagnosis allows a personalized management strategy, accurate family planning, and pregnancy management decisions including options for mode of delivery, or early antenatal OI treatment. Future research on molecular pathways and pathogenic variants involved could lead to the development of genotype-based therapeutic approaches. This narrative review summarizes our current understanding of genes, molecular mechanisms involved in OI, classifications, and their utility in prophylaxis.

Reproductive options for families at risk of Osteogenesis Imperfecta: a review

Background

Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI) is a rare genetic disorder involving bone fragility. OI patients typically suffer from numerous fractures, skeletal deformities, shortness of stature and hearing loss. The disorder is characterised by genetic and clinical heterogeneity. Pathogenic variants in more than 20 different genes can lead to OI, and phenotypes can range from mild to lethal forms. As a genetic disorder which undoubtedly affects quality of life, OI significantly alters the reproductive confidence of families at risk. The current review describes a selection of the latest reproductive approaches which may be suitable for prospective parents faced with a risk of OI. The aim of the review is to alleviate suffering in relation to family planning around OI, by enabling prospective parents to make informed and independent decisions.

Main body

The current review provides a comprehensive overview of possible reproductive options for people with OI and for unaffected carriers of OI pathogenic genetic variants. The review considers reproductive options across all phases of family planning, including pre-pregnancy, fertilisation, pregnancy, and post-pregnancy. Special attention is given to the more modern techniques of assisted reproduction, such as preconception carrier screening, preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases and non-invasive prenatal testing. The review outlines the methodologies of the different reproductive approaches available to OI families and highlights their advantages and disadvantages. These are presented as a decision tree, which takes into account the autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive nature of the OI variants, and the OI-related risks of people without OI.

The complex process of decision-making around OI reproductive options is also discussed from an ethical perspective.

Conclusion

The rapid development of molecular techniques has led to the availability of a wide variety of reproductive options for prospective parents faced with a risk of OI. However, such options may raise ethical concerns in terms of methodologies, choice management and good clinical practice in reproductive care, which are yet to be fully addressed.

Genetic and preimplantation diagnosis of cystic kidney disease with ventriculomegaly

Ventriculomegaly with cystic kidney disease (VMCKD) is a rare and severe disorder characterized by cerebral ventriculomegaly, greatly elevated maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein (MSAFP) or amniotic fluid alpha-fetoprotein (AFAFP) levels and kidney disease similar to Finnish congenital nephrosis. Recessive mutations in the CRB2 (NM_173689) gene have been shown to cause the syndrome. Here, we described a nonconsanguineous Chinese family with two fetuses affected with VMCKD. A novel compound heterozygous mutation was identified in the CRB2 gene with co-segregation. One mutation [c.1960G>C (p.A654P)] was inherited from the father, while another mutation [c.3078_c.3093delGGCGCGGCCCCGGCCC (p.L1026Lfs*110)] was inherited from the mother. Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disease (PGT-M) was performed for the carrier couple with full informed consent and successfully blocked the inheritance of the disease. Our study has important implications on molecular diagnosis and genetic counseling for VMCKD and extends the mutation spectrum in CRB2 gene.