Machado R, Teixeira G, Oliveira P, Loureiro L, Pereira C, Almeida R. Is Age a Determinant Factor in EVAR as a Predictor of Outcomes or in the Selection Procedure? Our Experience.
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 2017;
31:132-9. [PMID:
27556312 PMCID:
PMC5062736 DOI:
10.5935/1678-9741.20160037]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2016] [Accepted: 04/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction
Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is the therapy of choice in high risk
patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. The good results described are
leading to the broadening of clinical indications to younger patients.
However, reintervention rates seem higher and even with successful treatment
sometimes there is growth of the aneurysm sac and rupture, meaning a failure
of the therapeutic goal. This study proposes to analyse the impact of age in
patients' selection and post-EVAR results.
Methods
The clinical records of consecutive patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm
repair, between 2001 and 2013, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were
divided according to age groups (<70, 70-80 and >80 years). Gender,
body mass index, aneurysm anatomic features, neck characteristics, iliac
morphology, surgical indication, endograft type, anesthesic risk
classification, length of stay, reinterventions and mortality were analysed
and compared.
Results
The study included 171 patients, 161 (94.1%) men, and mean age
74.1±8.9 years. The age group under 70 had 32% of the patients. Only
three characteristics were found different among age groups: 1) body mass
index was higher in younger patients, with a considerable trend toward
significance (P=0.06); 2) surgical indication, in the younger group,
surgeon's and the patient's option were more proeminent
(P<0.05); 3) erectile dysfunction was higher in elderly
group (P<0.05). No other clinical and anatomical
characteristics or final outcomes were found statisticaly different among
age groups.
Conclusion
The absence of statistically differences in mortality and reinterventions
among age groups suggests that age by itself is not a relevant factor in
endovascular aneurysm repair. Indeed, the three characteristics different in
younger (obesity, sexual function and patient's choice) favor endovascular
aneurysm repair.
Collapse