Arterial Stiffness Use for Early Monitoring of Cardiovascular Adverse Events due to Anthracycline Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients. A Pilot Study

Cardiovascular Imaging in Contemporary Cardio-Oncology: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Advances in cancer therapeutics have led to dramatic improvements in survival, now inclusive of nearly 20 million patients and rising. However, cardiovascular toxicities associated with specific cancer therapeutics adversely affect the outcomes of patients with cancer. Advances in cardiovascular imaging have solidified the critical role for robust methods for detecting, monitoring, and prognosticating cardiac risk among patients with cancer. However, decentralized evaluations have led to a lack of consensus on the optimal uses of imaging in contemporary cancer treatment (eg, immunotherapy, targeted, or biological therapy) settings. Similarly, available isolated preclinical and clinical studies have provided incomplete insights into the effectiveness of multiple modalities for cardiovascular imaging in cancer care. The aims of this scientific statement are to define the current state of evidence for cardiovascular imaging in the cancer treatment and survivorship settings and to propose novel methodological approaches to inform the optimal application of cardiovascular imaging in future clinical trials and registries. We also propose an evidence-based integrated approach to the use of cardiovascular imaging in routine clinical settings. This scientific statement summarizes and clarifies available evidence while providing guidance on the optimal uses of multimodality cardiovascular imaging in the era of emerging anticancer therapies.

[Particularities of arterial stiffness dynamics on the background of breast cancer chemotherapy]

BACKGROUND

Modern breast cancer chemotherapy regimens (BC) consider individual patient parameters and ranges of cardiotoxic doses. However, clinicians often record clinical and laboratory-instrumental signs of cardio- and vasculotoxicity in patients, which emphasizes the high importance of searching for markers of early toxic response.

AIM

To study the characteristics of the response of arterial stiffness on the background of anthracycline-containing chemotherapy to determine potential markers of vasculotoxicity in BC patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

20 women with a BC were included. The patients received 4 cycles of chemotherapy in the doxorubicin + cyclophosphane (AC) regimen with an interval of 2-3 weeks, then they were injected with paclitaxel weekly for 12 injections, or docetaxel once every 3 weeks. All patients underwent TTE, arterial stiffness determination by the "gold standard" method and using volumetric sphygmography before the start of treatment, after the completion of the anthracycline component and after the end of taxanes.

RESULTS

The average age of the patients was 45.5±5.31 years. After completing the course of anthracyclines, there was a significant increase in heart rate (from 65.6±9.3 to 73.3±10.1 beats/min.), a decrease in SBP (from 122.6±9.9 to 116.5±12.3 mmHg) and DBP (from 78.9±8.5 to 76.2±8.6 mmHg), a decrease in carotid femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) (from 9.32±1.41 to 7.85±1.57 m/s), CAVI index on the left (from 6.78±0.81 to 6.5±0.88), the velocity of the cardio-ankle pulse wave on the right and left (from 6.7±0.6 to 6.5±0.7 m/s; from 7.0±0.6 to 6.3±0.8 m/sc, respectively). After the completion of the taxane, there was a tendency to increase these indicators, however, they remained significantly lower compared to the values before the start of treatment.

CONCLUSION

A comparative analysis of arterial stiffness indicators at different stages of chemotherapy showed a more pronounced reaction of cfPWV, CAVI, cardio-ankle pulse wave to the administration of anthracyclines, which presumably may be associated with concomitant hemodynamic restructuring.

Perturbations of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Cardiovascular Responses and Exercise Tolerance in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Simple Summary

The present study aimed to assess and compare the effects of receiving CAF (cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/fluorouracil) and AC-T (doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide→taxanes) on exercise tolerance and cardiovascular responses in patients with early-stage breast cancer. We herein demonstrated that AC-T chemotherapy increased resting heart rate (RHR) and induced a greater reduction in exercise tolerance at the end of chemotherapy compared with CAF. Moreover, AC-T also lowered myocardial perfusion more than CAF, and it appeared that myocardial impairment occurred before the development of arterial stiffening after chemotherapy. We, therefore, suggest that AC-T chemotherapy might further limit the exercise capacity of patients with early-stage breast cancer. This study provides fundamental information regarding the variety of cardiovascular responses to exercise after chemotherapy in patients with early-stage breast cancer. This information will help clinical professionals in the fields of oncological and rehabilitation medicine to precisely prescribe post-chemotherapy exercise programs when patients are receiving different chemotherapies.

Abstract

Background: Adjuvant chemotherapies are commonly used for treating early-stage breast cancer. However, whether chemotherapeutic regimens affect exercise tolerance and cardiovascular responses remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the effects of receiving CAF and AC-T on exercise tolerance and cardiovascular responses in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Methods: Thirty-four patients with breast cancer (age: 44 ± 1 years; stage I-II) received either CAF (n = 15) or AC-T (n = 19), depending on clinical decisions. Their step-exercise tolerance and cardiovascular responses were assessed before and after chemotherapy. Results: After chemotherapy, there were no differences in baseline measurements between patients receiving CAF or AC-T. The increases in resting heart rate (RHR) of those receiving AC-T was significantly greater than that of those receiving CAF. CAF and AC-T did not result in increased pulse wave velocity (PWV), yet the subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR) in patients receiving AC-T was significantly lower than the baseline. Greater change in post-exercise heart rate recovery (recovery HR) after chemotherapy was observed in those who had received AC-T; the Recovery HR in AC-T patients was significantly higher during post-exercise period than that in CAF patients. Conclusions: AC-T chemotherapy increases RHR and impairs exercise tolerance after chemotherapy more than CAF. Moreover, AC-T also lowers myocardial perfusion more than CAF after chemotherapy.

Anticancer Therapy-Related Increases in Arterial Stiffness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Cardio‐oncology is a clinical discipline focused primarily on the early detection of anticancer therapy–related cardiomyopathy. However, there is growing evidence that the direct adverse consequences extend beyond the myocardium to affect the vasculature, but this evidence remains limited. In addition, there remains a paucity of clinically based strategies for monitoring vascular toxicity in these patients. Importantly, arterial stiffness is increasingly recognized as a surrogate end point for cardiovascular disease and may be an important vascular outcome to consider. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to summarize evidence of increased arterial stiffening with anticancer therapy and evaluate the effect of treatment modifiers.

Methods and Results

A total of 19 longitudinal and cross‐sectional studies that evaluated arterial stiffness both during and following anticancer therapy were identified using multiple databases. Two separate analyses were performed: baseline to follow‐up (12 studies) and control versus patient groups (10 studies). Subgroup analysis evaluated whether stiffness differed as a function of treatment type and follow‐up time. Standard mean differences and mean differences were calculated using random effect models. Significant increases in arterial stiffness were identified from baseline to follow‐up (standard mean difference, 0.890; 95% CI, 0.448–1.332; P<0.0001; mean difference, 1.505; 95% CI, 0.789–2.221; P≤0.0001) and in patient versus control groups (standard mean difference, 0.860; 95% CI, 0.402–1.318; P=0.0002; mean difference, 1.437; 95% CI, 0.426–2.448; P=0.0052). Subgroup analysis indicated differences in arterial stiffness between anthracycline‐based and non‐anthracycline‐based therapies (standard mean difference, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.001–0.41; P=0.048), but not follow‐up time.

Conclusions

Significant arterial stiffening occurs following anticancer therapy. Our findings support the use of arterial stiffness as part of a targeted vascular imaging strategy for the identification of early cardiovascular injury during treatment and for the detection of long‐term cardiovascular injury into survivorship.