Prevalence of Lens Opacity in Interventional Cardiologists and Professional Working in the Hemodynamics in Brazil

Occupational exposures and age-related cataract: A review

Occupational exposures comprise of a broad range of factors in constant and direct contact with the ocular surface. Cataract, a leading cause of visual impairment globally, has been associated with various occupational exposures. This review critically examines existing literature on the relationship between occupational exposures and cataract development. We aim to synthesize findings from studies exploring the impact of occupational factors such as ultraviolet (UV) radiation, ionizing radiation, welding fumes, polyaromatic hydrocarbons, tobacco dust, and other elements on the prevalence and incidence of cataract among exposed populations. In our review, certain exposures, such as UV radiation, demonstrated strong evidence regarding their association with cataract development, while others presented suggestive evidence. Hence, further studies are needed to better understand exposures of greatest concern, which can subsequently inform regulations pertaining to occupational exposures in work environments.

Occupational Risks of Radiation Exposure to Cardiologists

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Invasive cardiologists are exposed to large amounts of ionizing radiation. This review aims to summarize the main occupational risks in a radiation-exposed cardiology practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

We carried out a literature review on the subject. The studies reviewed allowed us to list six main health risk categories possibly associated with radiation exposure among cardiologists: deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and biochemical damages; cancers; ocular manifestations; olfaction, vascular, and neuropsychological alterations; musculoskeletal problems; and reproductive risks. Our descriptive analysis demonstrates higher risks of DNA damage and lens opacities among radiation-exposed cardiology staff. Surveys and questionnaires have demonstrated a higher risk of musculoskeletal disease in exposed workers. Studies reported no difference in cancer frequency between radiation-exposed workers and controls. Changes in olfactory performance, neuropsychological aspects, and vascular changes have also been reported. Limited literature supports the security of continuing radiation-exposed work during pregnancy. Therefore, there is an urgent need to increase knowledge of the occupational risks of radiation exposure and to adopt technologies to reduce them.

Fluoroscopically guided vascular and cardiac transcatheter procedures: a comparison of occupational and patient dose by anatomical region

X-ray guided procedures are being performed by an increasing variety of medical specialties. Due to improvements in vascular transcatheter therapies, there is an increasing overlap of imaged anatomy between medical specialties. There is concern that non-radiology fluoroscopic operators may not have sufficient training to be well informed of the potential implications of radiation exposure and mitigation strategies to reduce dose. This was a prospective, observational, single center study to compare occupational and patient dose levels when imaging different anatomical regions during fluoroscopically guided cardiac and endovascular procedures. Occupational radiation dose was measured at the level of the temple of 24 cardiologists and 3 vascular surgeons (n = 1369), 32 scrub nurses (n = 1307) and 35 circulating nurses (n = 885). The patient dose was recorded for procedures (n = 1792) performed in three angiography suites. Abdominal imaging during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures was associated with a comparatively high average patient, operator and scrub nurse dose despite additional table-mounted lead shields. Air kerma was relatively high for procedures performed in the chest, and chest + pelvis. Higher dose area product and staff eye dose were recorded during procedures of the chest + pelvis due to the use of digital subtraction angiography to evaluate access route prior to/during transaortic valve implantation. Scrub nurses were exposed to higher average radiation levels than the operator during some procedures. Staff should be cognizant of the potentially higher radiation burden to patients and exposed personnel during EVAR procedures and cardiac procedures using digital subtraction angiography.

Cardiologist's exposure to radiation in cath lab measured with InstadoseTMdosimeter

INTRODUCTION

complex fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures in cardiology are known to result in higher radiation doses for patients and staff.

PURPOSE

to estimate the equivalent dose received in different regions of the cardiologist's body in catheterism (CATH) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures, as well as to evaluate the effectiveness of monitoring the doses in the catheritization laboratory (cath lab) using a direct ion storage dosimeter.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

the Instadose^TMand the thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD-100) were fixed simultaneously in the following regions of the cardiologist's body: near the eyes (left and right), the trunk region (over the lead apron) and the left ankle. Occupational doses were recorded during 86 procedures (60% CATH).

RESULTS

catheterization procedures showed third quartile dose values near to the left eye region equal to 0.10 mSv (TLD-100) and 0.12 (Instadose^TM) and for intervention 0.15 mSv (TLD-100 and Instadose^TM). The doses measured in the trunk region, over the lead apron, were about 13% higher for catheterization procedures and 20% higher for intervention procedures compared to left eye region measurements. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was applied for unpaired data for all body regions, comparing the data obtained between the TLD-100 and Instadose^TMdosimeters. For CATH and PCI, the responses of the TLD-100 and Instadose^TMdosimeters are considered equal for all analysed regions (p> 0.05) with the exception of the right eye region.

CONCLUSION

the Instadose^TMpassive dosimeter can be useful as a complementary assessment in the monitoring of a cardiologist's personal occupational doses in the cath lab.

Individual response of the ocular lens to ionizing radiation

PURPOSE

Cataract (opacification of the ocular lens) is a typical tissue reaction (deterministic effect) following ionizing radiation exposure, for which prevention dose limits have been recommended in the radiation protection system. Manifestations of radiation cataracts can vary among individuals, but such potential individual responses remain uncharacterized. Here we review relevant literature and discuss implications for radiation protection. This review assesses evidence for significant modification of radiation-induced cataractogenesis by age at exposure, sex and genetic factors based on current scientific literature.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to obvious physical factors (e.g. dose, dose rate, radiation quality, irradiation volume), potential factors modifying individual responses for radiation cataracts include sex, age and genetics, with comorbidity and coexposures also having important roles. There are indications and preliminary data identifying such potential modifiers of radiation cataract incidence or risk, although no firm conclusions can yet be drawn. Further studies and a consensus on the evidence are needed to gain deeper insights into factors determining individual responses regarding radiation cataracts and the implications for radiation protection.

Eye lens opacities and cataracts among physicians and healthcare workers occupationally exposed to radiation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the risk of developing eye lens opacities and cataracts among physicians and healthcare workers occupationally exposed to radiation.

METHODS

Our literature search captured articles published in Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Google Scholar databases until September 2021. Then, we retrieved articles reporting cataracts and eye lens opacities induced by radiation exposure among healthcare professionals. The outcomes of interest were cataracts, nuclear opacity, cortical opacity, posterior subcapsular opacity, and any lens opacity.

RESULTS

Of the 4123 articles identified, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. Healthcare workers exposed to radiation had a significantly greater risk of posterior subcapsular cataracts (PSCs), cataracts, and any lens opacities than those of the non-exposed participants (p<0.05). The cortical opacity was not significantly different between the exposed and non-exposed participants (p>0.05). Radiation was not determined to be a risk factor for nuclear opacity as it was significantly greater in the control group than the exposed participants. Subgroup analysis revealed that nurses had the highest risk for PSCs (risk ratio = 4.00), followed by interventional cardiologists (risk ratio = 3.85).

CONCLUSION

The risk of posterior subcapsular opacities and cataracts is significantly higher in healthcare workers with occupational radiation exposure than in non-exposed workers, highlighting the necessity to enhance and promote the wearing of protective measures with high safety levels.

The practice of radiation protection in an interventional neuroradiology service

Introduction

Interventional neuroradiology procedures subject professionals who work in this area to high doses of ionizing radiation, and such exposure leads to a higher chance of occupational diseases related to this physical risk. Radiation protection practices aim to reduce the occurrence of such damage to the health of these workers.

Objectives

To identify how the practice of radiation protection occurs in a multidisciplinary team of an interventional neuroradiology service in the state of Santa Catarina, Brazil.

Methods

A qualitative, exploratory, and descriptive research conducted with nine health professionals from the multidisciplinary team. Non-participant observation and a survey form were used as data collection techniques. For data analysis, descriptive analysis based on absolute and relative frequency and content analysis were used.

Results

Although some practices showed the use of radiation protection measures in practice, such as workers taking turns to perform procedures and continuous use of the lead apron as well as the mobile suspended protection, we found that most of the practices violate the principles of radiation protection. Among these inadequate radiological protection practices, the following aspects were observed: not wearing lead goggles, not using collimation to obtain the image, poor knowledge of the principles of radiation protection and biological effects of ionizing radiation, and non-use of an individual dosimeter.

Conclusions

There was a lack of know-how of the multidisciplinary team working in interventional neuroradiology regarding the practice of radiation protection.

Correlation Between Degree of Lens Opacity and the Phacoemulsification Energy Parameters Using Different Imaging Methods in Age-Related Cataract

Purpose

To compare the correlation between degree of lens opacity and the phacoemulsification energy parameter in patients with age-related cataract as determined by slit lamp, 25-MHz ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM), and Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam) and to evaluate the application of these three methods to measuring lens opacification.

Methods

This observational study was conducted in 319 patients (381 eyes) with different types of age-related cataract. The average age of patients was 67.3 ± 11.4 years. The degree of lens opacity acquired by slit lamp, 25-MHz UBM, and Pentacam was determined by the Lens Opacity Classification System III (LOCSIII), pixel units calculated by ImageJ, and lens density, respectively. We primarily analyzed and compared the correlation between lens opacity and the cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) values of phacoemulsification.

Results

Cortical, nuclear, and posterior subcapsular (PSC) cataracts were evaluated as follows: LOCSIII grades 3.31 ± 1.42, 3.29 ± 1.49, and 0.91 ± 0.83; pixel units 120.91 ± 22.8, 93.2 ± 15.9, and 99.7 ± 13.0; and lens density 51.8 ± 31.2, 21.2 ± 6.10, and 53.3 ± 35.3, respectively. The CDE values were 12.1 ± 12.4, 13.5 ± 9.11, and 3.93 ± 1.96. In cortical cataract, there was a linear correlation among LOCSIII, pixel units, and CDE value (r = 0.560, r = 0.832, and r = 0.582, respectively; both P < 0.05), but lens density had no correlation with other parameters. In nuclear cataract, there was a linear correlation among LOCSIII, lens density, and CDE value (r = 0.747, r = 0.865, and r = 0.906, respectively; both P < 0.05), but pixel units had no correlation with other parameters. In PSC, only pixel units and LOCSIII showed a correlation.

Conclusions

The various imaging methods offered different advantages in terms of determining lens opacity, a feature related to types of age-related cataracts. Choosing the most suitable imaging method to evaluate lens opacification based on the type of age-related cataract is important for accurately predicting the phacoemulsification parameters for cataract surgery.

Translational Relevance

Determining the appropriate phacoemulsification strategy depends on quantitative analysis of the degree of lens opacity to reduce intraoperative and postoperative complications and to obtain the optimal postoperative visual outcome.

Risk of cataract in health care workers exposed to ionizing radiation: a systematic review

Background:

The eye is an important sensory organ occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation (IR) in healthcare workers (HCWs) engaged in medical imaging (MI). New evidence highlights the possible induction of cataract at IR exposure levels to be much lower than expected in the past.

Objective:

Conduct an updated review on the current evidence on cataract risk in healthcare workers exposed to IR.

Methods:

Published scientific studies on cataract risk in IR exposed healthcare workers were collected through a systematic search of two biomedical databases (MEDLINE and Scopus). Data from included studies was extracted and summarized. Study quality was also assessed.

Results:

All 21 eligible studies reported an increased prevalence of cataract, especially posterior subcapsular cataract, in IR exposed HCWs with a higher prevalence in interventional cardiology staff.

Discussion:

Our review synthesizes the latest evidence to support the hypothesis of a significantly increased risk of occupational cataract in healthcare workers operating MI and exposed to IR, especially in interventional cardiologists. Data also support a dose-response relationship between IR exposure and the prevalence of opacities, especially posterior subcapsular opacities.

Conclusions:

Findings highlight the need for effective control measures including appropriate training, adherence to protective procedures, and a constant use of shields and eye personal protective equipment in healthcare workers with optical exposure to IR. Periodic health surveillance programs, possibly including lens evaluation, are also important to monitor cataract risk in these MI operators.