New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in St-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Predictors and Impact on Therapy And Mortality

Atrial fibrillation increases the risk of new-onset myocardial infarction amongst working-age population: a propensity-matched study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between atrial fibrillation (AF) and new-onset myocardial infarction (MI) among a working-age population in an industrial city of North China.

METHODS

In total 77,670 participants aged under 60 years were selected for this cohort study. Participants were divided into an AF group (n = 121) and a non-AF group (n = 74,565) based on their medical histories. Thereafter, 121 participants from the AF group were propensity-matched with 363 participants from the non-AF group. All participants were followed up from June 2006 to December 2020; new-onset MI was regarded as the endpoint of this study. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis models were designed to analyze the correlation between AF and new-onset MI.

RESULTS

During the 14-year follow-up, eight cases of new-onset MI were documented in the AF group, while five cases were documented in the non-AF group. The cumulative incidence of new-onset MI in the AF group (7.40%) was markedly higher than in the non-AF group (1.41%; p < 0.001). Atrial fibrillation was associated with an increased risk of new-onset MI in both univariate analysis (hazard ratio: 5.202, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.700-15.913) and multivariable-adjusted analysis (hazard ratio: 5.335, 95% CI: 1.683-16.910).

CONCLUSION

Atrial fibrillation increased the risk of new-onset MI amongst working-age individuals in an industrial city of North China.

Incidence, clinical predictors, and clinical effect of new-onset atrial fibrillation in myocardial infarction patients: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To calculate the incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) in myocardial infarction (MI) patients and examine associated predictors and clinical outcomes of NOAF patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was used to carry out this study. All MI patients admitted to King Khaled University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between January 2015 to 2020 were eligible for inclusion. The study excluded those with a previous diagnosis of atrial fibrillation and patients who died at presentation.

RESULTS

A total of 281 patients were analyzed with a mean age of 58.7±12.7. Incidence of NOAF was 7.8%. Significant predictors identified by multivariate logistic regression analysis included older age (p=0.004), history of MI (p=0.012), and undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) as treatment (p=0.016). New-onset atrial fibrillation was associated with higher odds of major adverse cardiovascular event (p=0.039), ventricular tachycardia (p=0.001), and mortality (p=0.031).

CONCLUSION

New-onset atrial fibrillation is a relatively common complication of MI, and in our study, it was associated with higher odds of further complications including death. Therefore, identification of MI patients at risk of developing NOAF is crucial. Our study suggests that older age, a previous history of MI, and undergoing CABG are significant predictors of NOAF development.

New-onset atrial fibrillation after acute coronary syndrome: prevalence and predictive factors

INTRODUCTION

New-onset AF atrial fibrillation (NOAF) frequently complicates acute coronary syndromes (ACS) leading to adverse outcomes in the short and long term. The prevalence of NOAF in patients hospitalized for ACS is variably reported and ranges between 2 and 37%. Several predictor factors have been implicated in the literature but remain a subject of controversy.

AIM

To determine the prevalence of NOAF in a population of patients admitted for ACS and to identify its predictive factors.

METHODS

We carried out a prospective, descriptive and comparative observational study in hospitalized patients with ACS who did not have a previous diagnosis of AF.

RESULTS

In our study, we included 404 patients hospitalized for ACS. The prevalence of NOAF was 10%. In the multivariate analytical study, we retained as independent predictors of NOAF: age greater than 62 years (p = 0.04; adjusted OR = 4.83; CI95%: 1.07-21.77), chronic renal failure (p = 0.043; adjusted OR = 6.61; CI95%: 1.06-35.80), history of stroke (p = 0.002; adjusted OR = 44.51; CI95%: 3.97- 498.10) and finally uricemia greater than or equal to 62 mg / l (p = 0.04; adjusted OR = 4.4; CI95%: 1.06-18.15).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of NOAF in patients with ACS was 10%. Its systematic screening in these patients appears to be a relevant approach because of the strong association between these two pathologies.

Use of Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Atrial Fibrillation

The incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) ranges from 2.3–23%. This difference in the incidence of AF is explained by the different ages of the patients in different studies and the different times of application of both reperfusion and drug therapies in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). About 6–8% of patients who underwent percutaneous intervention within AMI have an indication for oral anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonists or new oral anticoagulants (NOAC).The use of oral anticoagulant therapy should be consistent with individual risk of bleeding as well as ischemic risk. Both HAS-BLED and CHA2DS2VASc scores are most commonly used for risk assessment. Except in patients with mechanical valves and antiphospholipid syndrome, NOACs have an advantage over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). One of the advantages of NOACs is the use of fixed doses, where there is no need for successive INR controls, which increases the patient’s compliance in taking these drugs. The use of triple therapy in ACS is indicated in the case of patients with AF, mechanical valves as well as venous thromboembolism. The results of the studies showed that when choosing a P2Y12 receptor blocker, less potent P2Y12 blockers such as Clopidogrel should be chosen, due to the lower risk of bleeding. It has been proven that the presence of AF within AMI is associated with a higher degree of reinfarction, more frequent stroke, high incidence of heart failure, and there is a correlation with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death. With the appearance of AF in ACS, its rapid conversion into sinus rhythm is necessary, and in the last resort, good control of heart rate in order to avoid the occurrence of adverse clinical events.

Impact of kidney function on the occurrence of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to examine the prognostic impact of decreased kidney function at admission on the occurrence of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI).

METHODS

The study enrolled 3,115 consecutive patients with STEMI. Kidney function was assessed by estimation of the glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at admission. Patients with cardiogenic shock at admission, patients on hemodialysis, and patients with a medical history of previous AF (paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent) were excluded. The follow-up period was six years.

RESULTS

New-onset AF occurred in 215 (6.9%) patients, 75 (34.9%) patients presented with AF, and 140 (65.1%) patients developed AF after pPCI. The median time of AF occurrence in patients who did not present with AF was 4.5 (interquartile range 1-25) hours after pPCI. New-onset AF was associated with a higher short- and long-term mortality. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, all stages of reduced kidney function were independent predictors for the occurrence of new-onset AF, and negative prognostic impact increased with the deterioration of kidney function: eGFR <90 mL/min/m2, hazard ratio (HR) 1.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.42-2.89, p=0.011; eGFR 60-89 mL/min/m2, HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.13-2.57, p=0.045; eGFR 45-59 mL/min/m2-, HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.24-2.85, p=0.023; eGFR 30-44 mL/min/m2-, HR 2.93, 95% CI 1.64-5.29, p<0.001; eGFR 15-29 mL/min/m2-, HR 5.51, 95% CI 2.67-11.39, p<0.001.

CONCLUSION

Decreased kidney function was significantly associated with the occurrence of new-onset AF, and its impact increased with the deterioration in kidney function, starting with an eGFR value of 90 mL/min/m2. New-onset AF was an independent predictor of long-term all-cause mortality in the analyzed patients.

Comprehensive Use of Routine Clinical Parameters to Identify Patients at Risk of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Acute Myocardial Infarction

(1) Background: New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is a significant complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Our study aimed to investigate whether routinely checked clinical parameters aid in NOAF identification in modernly treated AMI patients. (2) Patients and methods: Patients admitted consecutively within 2017 and 2018 to the University Clinical Centre in Gdańsk (Poland) with AMI diagnosis (necrosis evidence in a clinical setting consistent with acute myocardial ischemia) were enrolled. Medical history and clinical parameters were checked during NOAF prediction. (3) Results: NOAF was diagnosed in 106 (11%) of 954 patients and was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (OR 4.54, 95% CI 2.50-8.33, p < 0.001). Age, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), C-reactive protein (CRP), high-sensitivity troponin I, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, potassium, hemoglobin, leucocytes, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, left atrium size, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were associated with NOAF in the univariate logistic analysis, whereas age ≥ 66 yo, BNP ≥ 340 pg/mL, CRP ≥ 7.7 mg/L, and LVEF ≤ 44% were associated with NOAF in the multivariate analysis. (4) Conclusions: NOAF is a multifactorial, significant complication of AMI, leading to a worse prognosis. Simple, routinely checked clinical parameters could be helpful indices of this arrhythmia in current invasively treated patients with AMI.

Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Ischemic Stroke: Risk Factors, Prognosis, Unresolved Problems and Possible Methods of Prevention

The present work is devoted to the analysis of modern publications on various aspects of the development and course of ischemic stroke in the presence of acute myocardial infarction. A literature search was conducted on the websites of cardiological and neurological societies, as well as on the PubMed, EMBASE, eLibrary databases using the keywords: myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, acute cerebrovascular accident, myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, stroke. The authors of this review found that although stroke is a relatively rare complication of myocardial infarction, its prevention is an extremely significant task, since it is associated with high mortality, disability and a significant increase in the cost of treatment. So, it is extremely important to detect thrombosis of the left ventricular cavity in a timely manner, to register preexisting atrial fibrillation that occurs earlier or for the first time, followed by the appointment of anticoagulant therapy. Timely reperfusion treatment, the use of statins and modern dual antithrombotic therapy can reduce the risk of developing cerebrovascular accident in patients with myocardial infarction. It is likely that a decrease in the activity of subclinical inflammation after myocardial infarction will also reduce the risk of stroke, as was recently shown in the COLCOT study. Currently, it remains relevant to search for new knowledge about the risk factors for stroke, which complicated the course of myocardial infarction, which will allow developing more effective and personalized preventive measures in a patient with acute coronary syndrome.

The Multifaceted Interplay between Atrial Fibrillation and Myocardial Infarction: A Review

This review was conducted to emphasize the complex interplay between atrial fibrillation (AF) and myocardial infraction (MI). In type 1 (T1) MI, AF is frequent and associated with excess mortality. Moreover, AF after hospital discharge for T1MI is not rare, suggesting the need to improve AF screening and to develop therapeutic strategies for AF recurrence. Additionally, AF is a common trigger for type 2 MI (T2MI), and recent data have shown that tachyarrhythmia or bradyarrhythmia could be a causal factor in, respectively, 13-47% or 2-7% of T2MI. In addition, AF is involved in T2MI pathogenesis as a result of severe anemia related to anticoagulants. AF is also an underestimated and frequent cause of coronary artery embolism (CE), as a situation at risk of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries. AF-causing CE is difficult to diagnose and requires specific management. Moreover, patients with both AF and chronic coronary syndromes represent a therapeutic challenge because the treatment of AF include anticoagulation, depending on the embolic risk, and ischemic heart disease management paradoxically includes antiplatelet therapy.

Effect of 2 Different Dosages of Rosuvastatin on Prognosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients with New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Jinan, China

BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation (AF) often occurs in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study aimed to observe the influence of different dosages of rosuvastatin on the prognosis of AMI patients with AF. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed an observational, retrospective cohort study in Jinan, China, in which 323 AMI patients were recruited. All patients were randomized to receive optimal medication treatment and 10 mg or 20 mg of rosuvastatin. Holter monitor results, serum lipid levels, and heart function were recorded. We used multivariate Cox and Kaplan-Meier analyses to assess the independent factors and differences in AF and ischemia events and safety of rosuvastatin administered at different dosages. RESULTS TC, LDL-C, and TG at 1 and 12 months were significantly lower compared with those observed prior to treatment in both groups. The heart function of both groups was significantly improved after 12 months of treatment, especially in the 20 mg group. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that different dosages of rosuvastatin, age, smoking, drinking alcohol, and diabetes are independent factors related to the occurrence of AF and ischemic events. In addition, according to Kaplan-Meier analysis, no significant difference in adverse clinical events existed at different dosages of rosuvastatin. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with rosuvastatin can reduce the serum lipid level and improve cardiac function. Different dosages of rosuvastatin, age, smoking, drinking alcohol, and diabetes are independent risk factors for AF and ischemia events. The results suggested it is safe to use 20 mg rosuvastatin in the 12 months after hospital admission.