Vitamin D deficiency in relation with the systemic and central inflammation during multiple sclerosis

Determination of systemic inflammatory biomarkers in multiple sclerosis

Background

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the most common demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system. We aimed to investigate serum and cerebrospinal fluid levels of different laboratory inflammatory biomarkers in patients with MS.

Methods

A total of 120 subjects participated in the study, 60 of whom were diagnosed with MS, 30 with the final diagnosis of non-inflammatory diseases of the central nervous system (CNS), and 30 healthy subjects representing the control group. Regarding the progression of radiological findings after 2 years from the initial diagnosis, the MS group was divided into stationary radiological findings (n=30) and radiologically proven disease progression (n=30). In all patients, we analyzed levels of laboratory inflammatory biomarkers: C reactive protein (CRP), Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) in serum samples, and neurofilaments (NFs) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). NFs and GDF15 were analyzed initially, while CRP and NLR values were analyzed initially and after two years.

Results

We found statistically lower GDF15 values and initial CRP values in the MS group regarding the group with non-inflammatory diseases of the CNS (p<0.0001). On the other side, we determined a significant elevation of laboratory markers CRP and NLR, initially and after a two-year period, in the MS subgroup with the progression of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings (p<0.0001 and p=0.050, respectively). Also, we found a positive correlation between CRP and NFs (r=0.243, p=0.04), as well as a positive correlation between CRP and GDF15 in patients with MS (r=0.769, p<0.0001).

Conclusions

We found a significant elevation of laboratory markers of systemic inflammation, CRP, and NLR in MS patients who developed disease progression based on MRI findings. There is a need for further studies to validate current parameters to be considered as useful markers of MS activity and disability.

Infrequent patterns in cerebrospinal fluid isofocusing test: Clinical significance and contribution of IgG index and Reiber diagram to their interpretation

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) isoelectrofocusing (IEF) is considered as the gold standard for detecting an intrathecal synthesis of IgG, which is a hallmark of multiple sclerosis (MS). This corresponds to the presence of CSF-restricted IgG oligoclonal bands (OCB) (typically type 2 pattern). Moreover, this technique can also detect a systemic immune reaction with passive transfer of IgG (type 3 and 4 patterns) for which the clinical relevance is less understood. The aim of our study was to determine the frequency and disease associations of IEF type 3 and 4 patterns and to investigate the potential usefulness of including quantitative data (IgG index and Reiber Diagram) in interpreting such IEF profiles. Among 544 patients who underwent CSF IEF (Hydragel CSF isofocusing kit, Sebia®, France) in our Laboratory during a six-year-period, those who presented type 3 or 4 patterns were selected. Clinical data and results of other immunological tests were analyzed for 27 patients followed in the Neurological Department. Frequencies of type 3 and type 4 patterns were relatively low (2.3 % and 3.4 % respectively). Among patients with type 3 pattern included in our study (n = 10), 5 were diagnosed with MS. For the 5 other patients, the diagnosis was a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) (2 cases), a probable auto-immune encephalitis (2 cases) and a possible genetic neurodegenerative disease (1 case). MS patients had an IgG index >0.7 and fell into area 4 of Reiber diagram while non-MS patients had an IgG index <0.7 and fell into area 1, except the last case. Regarding type 4 pattern (n = 17), the diagnoses were as follows: MS (3), CIS (4), Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders with positive anti-AQP4 antibodies (3) and anti-NMDAR autoimmune encephalitis (1). The remaining cases had central nervous system impairment related to vascular, metabolic or tumoral etiologies (3) or peripheral nervous system impairment (3). In this group (type 4 pattern), IgG index was <0.7 in 15/17 cases. Interpretation using Reiber diagram showed an abnormal blood-brain barrier for 8/17 patients. Type 3 and 4 IEF patterns are infrequently observed in routine neurology practice. It is important for the diagnostic laboratory professional as well as for the neurologist to understand their clinical relevance. Our findings highlight the contribution of quantitative evaluation of CSF (IgG index, Reiber diagram) for the interpretation of such situations. Despite the small size of our study population, our results emphasize the importance of reporting the exact type of IEF pattern and not only the positivity or not of OCB.