Role of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Guiding Treatment Plans for Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Tumors

Nomogram to predict gas-related complications during transoral endoscopic resection of upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions

BACKGROUND

Gas-related complications present a potential risk during transoral endoscopic resection of upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions. Therefore, the identification of risk factors associated with these complications is essential.

AIM

To develop a nomogram to predict risk of gas-related complications following transoral endoscopic resection of the upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions.

METHODS

We collected patient data from the First Affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University. Patients were randomly allocated to training and validation cohorts. Risk factors for gas-related complications were identified in the training cohort using univariate and multivariate analyses. We then constructed a nomogram and evaluated its predictive performance based on the area under the curve, decision curve analysis, and Hosmer-Lemeshow tests.

RESULTS

Gas-related complications developed in 39 of 353 patients who underwent transoral endoscopy at our institution. Diabetes, lesion origin, surgical resection method, and surgical duration were incorporated into the final nomogram. The predictive capability of the nomogram was excellent, with area under the curve values of 0.841 and 0.906 for the training and validation cohorts, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The ability of our four-variable nomogram to efficiently predict gas-related complications during transoral endoscopic resection enhanced postoperative assessments and surgical outcomes.

Prevalence, natural progression, and clinical practices of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions in Korea: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and natural progression of subepithelial lesions (SELs) in the upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tract.

METHODS

The medical records of patients with UGI SELs who underwent endoscopic screening at eight university hospitals between January and December 2010 were retrospectively investigated. The follow-up evaluations were performed until December 2016.

RESULTS

UGI SELs were found in 1,044 of the 65,233 participants screened (endoscopic prevalence, 1.60%; the total number of lesions, 1,062; mean age, 55.1±11.2 years; men, 53.6%). The median follow-up period was 48 (range, 8-74) months. SELs were most frequently found in the stomach (63.8%) and had a mean size of 9.9±6.1 mm. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) was performed in 293 patients (28.1%). The most common lesions were leiomyomas, followed by gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), and ectopic pancreas. The proportions of SELs with malignant potential according to size were 3% (<1 cm), 22% (1-2 cm), 27% (2-3 cm), and 38% (≥3 cm). In gastric SELs larger than 1 cm, resections were performed in 20 patients because of an increase in size, of which 12 were found to be GISTs.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of UGI SELs was 1.60%. Further, 23% of gastric SELs ≥1 cm were precancerous lesions, most followed by EUS and clinical decisions without initial pathological confirmation.

Clinical study of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of submucosal tumor originating from the muscularis propria layer of the esophagus

Herein, we aimed to evaluate the clinical value and safety of transendoscopic submucosal tunnel tumor resection (STER) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the resection of esophageal submucosal intrinsic muscle tumors. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 68 patients with esophageal submucosal intrinsic muscle tumors treated with STER (STER group, n = 38, March 2018 to January 2020) or ESD (ESD group, n = 30, January 2017 to January 2020) at the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang to compare the treatment efficacy, hospitalization time and costs, and postoperative complications between the 2 groups. All 68 cases were of single lesions. The mean operative duration was shorter in the STER group (53.39 ± 11.57 min) than in the ESD group (68.33 ± 18.52 min, P < .05). The postoperative hospital stay duration was significantly shorter in the STER group (5.86 ± 1.01 days; P < .05) than in the ESD group (8.2 ± 3.4 days, P < .05). The mean hospitalization cost was significantly lower in the STER group than in the ESD group (12,468.8 + 4966.8 yuan vs 17,033.3 ± 4547.2 yuan; P < .05). Only 1 case of intraoperative perforation occurred in ESD group. There were no other complications in both groups. The wound healed in both groups, and no residual or recurrent tumors were detected during the follow-up period. Both STER and ESD can be used for the treatment of esophageal intrinsic muscular layer (MP) tumors, and STER is safer and more efficient for lesions with a diameter <3.5 cm.

The value of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound in differential diagnosis and evaluation of malignant risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (<50mm)

OBJECTIVES

Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CEH-EUS) has been used in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant tumors by visualization of tumor microcirculation and perfusion. However, its diagnostic role in submucosal tumors (SMTs), especially leiomyomas and gastric submucosal tumors (GISTs) was rarely studied. The aim of this study was to analyze the diagnostic role of CEH-EUS for SMTs (<50 mm) and the value of assessing the malignant potential of GISTs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively included patients with tumors <50 mm in diameter who underwent preoperative EUS and CEH-EUS examination and had pathologically confirmed as leiomyomas and GISTs. To analyze the imaging features of CEH-EUS with pathological diagnosis as the gold standard and evaluate its diagnostic value.

RESULTS

This study included 10 cases of leiomyomas and 38 cases of GISTs. Under CEH-EUS detection, 86.9% of GISTs showed hyper-enhancement, 89.5% showed diffuse enhancement, 39.5% showed non-enhancing spots, and 97.4% showed obvious capsule enhancement. In contrast, the leiomyoma cases mostly showed hypo-enhancement (50.0%) or non-enhancement (30.0%) (p < 0.05). Then, the value of CEH-EUS in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant tumors based on blood flow is significantly higher than that of B-EUS. Signal appearance time was significantly faster in the intermediate-high risk GISTs than in the very low-low risk group (5.1 s versus 15.5 s, p < 0.05), and the AUROC values predicted the risk at this time to be 0.903 (0.763-0.975). Heterogeneous perfusion and non-enhancing spots were also more common in the intermediate-high risk group. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that intratumoral irregularitie was an independent predictor of moderate to high risk (OR 3.99, 95%CI 1.04-90.95), with sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 73.33%, 91.30% and 84.21%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Through this study, CEH-EUS has a good differential diagnostic ability for leiomyomas and GISTs, and has a high value in predicting the risk of GISTs.

Efficacy and safety of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for gastric submucosal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) can be an effective treatment for submucosal tumors (SMTs) in the esophagus and cardia. However, STER may be more difficult to perform in the stomach than in the esophagus due to special anatomical and physiological features. The feasibility of STER to remove gastric STMs has not been systematically investigated. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of STER for gastric SMTs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

a comprehensive literature search of the Medline, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted. Complete resection and en-bloc resection rates were considered as the primary outcome measures. The secondary outcome measure was the pooled estimate of complications.

RESULTS

nine studies including 301 patients with 305 lesions were finally included. The pooled estimate of en-bloc resections was 95.1 % (95 % CI: 88.9-97.9 %), Cochran's Q-test, p = 0.151, and the weighted pooled rate (WPR) for complete resection was 97.9 % (95 % CI: 93.6-99.3 %), Cochran's Q-test, p = 0.778. In addition, the pooled estimate of gas-related complications was 8.7 % (95 % CI: 4.6-15.9 %), Cochran's Q-test, p = 0.057. The pooled estimate for mucosal laceration was 4.2 % (95 % CI: 2.2-7.9 %), Cochran's Q-test, p = 0.572. The pooled estimate for delayed bleeding was 2.1 % (95 % CI: 0.9-4.8 %), Cochran's Q-test, p = 0.985. The pooled estimate of inflammation-related complications was 8.6 % (95 % CI: 5.2-13.9 %), Cochran's Q-test, p = 0.308.

CONCLUSION

STER is an effective and safe technique for removing gastric SMTs with low complications, and complications, when encountered, can be treated conservatively.

Predicting Malignancy Risk in Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Tumors with Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasonography Using Perfusion Analysis Software

Background/Aims

Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (CEH-EUS) is a promising imaging modality that can differentiate subepithelial tumors (SETs) by detecting the degree of enhancement. However, whether CEH-EUS alone can predict the malignancy risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of CEH-EUS by using perfusion analysis software for distinguishing among SETs and predicting the malignancy risk of GISTs.

Methods

We retrospectively included patients with SETs who underwent preoperative CEH-EUS. In this study, 44 patients with histologically proven GISTs and benign SETs were enrolled. Perfusion analysis was performed using perfusion quantification software. Peak enhancement (PE), wash-in rate (WiR), wash-in perfusion index (WiPI), and wash-in and wash-out areas under the time-intensity curve (WiWoAUC) were calculated and compared between the GISTs and benign SETs.

Results

When we allocated the enrolled patients into the leiomyoma group and low- and high-grade malignancy GIST groups, significant statistical differences in PE (p<0.001), WiR (p=0.009), WiPI (p<0.001), and WiWoAUC (p<0.001) were identified in the high-grade malignancy group compared with the leiomyoma group.

Conclusions

CEH-EUS with perfusion analysis using perfusion analysis software could be a quantitative and independent method for predicting malignancy risk in gastrointestinal SETs.

Comparison of the Diagnostic Ability of Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Tumors

Background/Aims

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is the most efficient imaging modality for gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs). However, abdominopelvic computed tomography (APCT) has other advantages in evaluating the characteristics, local extension, or invasion of SETs to adjacent organs. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic ability of EUS and APCT based on surgical histopathology results.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed data from 53 patients who underwent both EUS and APCT before laparoscopic wedge resection for gastric SETs from January 2010 to December 2017 at a single institution. On the basis of histopathology results, we assessed the diagnostic ability of the 2 tests.

Results

The overall accuracy of EUS and APCT was 64.2% and 50.9%, respectively. In particular, the accuracy of EUS vs. APCT for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), leiomyomas, and ectopic pancreas was 83.9% vs. 74.2%, 37.5% vs. 0.0%, and 57.1% vs. 14.3%, respectively. Most of the incorrect diagnoses with EUS involved hypoechoic lesions originating in the fourth echolayer, with the most common misdiagnosed lesions being GISTs mistaken for leiomyomas and vice versa.

Conclusions

APCT showed a lower overall accuracy than EUS; however, APCT remains a useful modality for malignant/potentially malignant gastric SETs.

Current Status of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Tumors

Gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors (GSTs) are usually detected incidentally on endoscopic or radiologic examinations. In conventional endoscopy, a GST usually presents as a protuberant lesion with an intact mucosal surface. As the lesion is located beneath the mucosal layer of the gastrointestinal tract, conventional biopsy typically does not reveal the pathologic diagnosis. First, a GST should be differentiated from an extrinsic compression through the positional change of the patient during conventional endoscopic examination. In cases of GSTs originating from the gastrointestinal wall, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) can be beneficial for narrowing the differential diagnosis through delineation of echo findings and by determining the layer of origin. EUS findings can also help determine the management strategies for GSTs by making a differential diagnosis according to malignant potential.

Efficacy and safety of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors with more than 1-year' follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives: Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) is a novel therapeutic approach for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors (SMTs) especially for tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer. Presently, several studies have reported the efficacy and safety of STER for SMTs. Therefore, we conducted this study to review the clinical outcomes of STER with more than 1-year' follow-up duration. Materials and methods: Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched on November 2018 to identify studies reporting STER for SMTs. Weighted pooled rates were calculated for en bloc resection, complete resection and adverse event (AE). Risk ratios (RR) were calculated and pooled to compare STER with thoracoscopic enucleation (TE). Results: A total of 701 patients with 728 lesions from 12 original studies were review. Pooled WPR for en bloc resection of STER was 86.3% (95% CI: 74.5-93.1%), (I²=82.5). Pooled WPR for complete resection of STER was 97.7% (95% CI: 92.8-99.3%), (I²=77.6). WPR for AE was 18.3% (95% CI: 9.7-31.6%), (I²=90.6%). Two studies with 292 patients compared the performance of STER with TE. Pooled RR for en bloc resection was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.95-1.09). Pooled RR for complete resection was 1.0 (95% CI: 0.98-1.03). Pooled RR for AE was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.33-2.05). Conclusions: Our study showed that STER has relatively long-term efficacy for treating upper gastrointestinal SMTs, and the incidence of AE was not low for STER, but all of them can be managed conservatively.

Feasibility of a 20-gauge ProCore needle in EUS-guided subepithelial tumor sampling: a prospective multicenter study

Background

Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) may facilitate tissue acquisition for a definitive diagnosis of gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors (SETs). This study aimed to determine the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNB using a novel 20-gauge ProCore needle with a coiled sheath in tissue sampling of gastrointestinal SETs.

Methods

Between July 2016 and February 2017, 39 patients with gastrointestinal SETs were prospectively recruited from six university hospitals in Korea. Hypoechoic SETs ≥2 cm in size and originating from the submucosal and/or muscularis propria layer under EUS were eligible. This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02884154).

Results

A total of 36 patients were included in the final analyses. EUS-FNB was diagnostic in 88.9% of SETs. Tissue adequacy was judged as optimal in 97.2% of FNB specimens according to on-site visual evaluation by endosonographers, and in 88.9% of specimens according to pathologists. A macroscopically optimal core sample was obtained with two needle passes in 94.4% of cases. Technical failure rate was encountered in two cases (5.6%) after two needle passes. There were two cases (5.6%) of bleeding, which was managed endoscopically.

Conclusions

EUS-FNB using a 20-gauge ProCore needle is a technically feasible and effective modality for histopathologic diagnosis of gastrointestinal SETs, providing adequate core samples with fewer needle passes;ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02884154.