1
|
Li JH, Wang LY, Song XM, Liu JS. Risk factors for intraepithelial neoplasia in patients with colorectal adenoma. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2018; 26:243-249. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v26.i4.243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To identify risk factors for intraepithelial neoplasia in colorectal adenoma by analyzing the clinical, endoscopic, and histopathological features of patients with colorectal adenoma.
METHODS The clinical, endoscopic, and histopathological features of 657 patients with colorectal adenomatous polyps diagnosed by colonoscopy from January 2014 to April 2016 at Wuhan Union Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into an intraepithelial neoplasia group and a non-intraepithelial neoplasia group according to the pathological diagnosis. χ2 test was applied for univariate analysis between the two groups. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors for intraepithelial neoplasia and its malignancy degree in adenoma.
RESULTS Most of colorectal adenomas were located in the left colon. The total incidence of intraepithelial neoplasia in colorectal adenoma was 22.68%. Age, polyp diameter, length of pedicle, and pathologic type were identified to be risk factors for intraepithelial neoplasia in adenoma, which could be incorporated in Logistic regression equation: logit P = -4.384 + 0.796X2 (age) + 0.324X3 (polyp diameter) + 1.296X4 (pedicle condition) + 0.944X7 (pathology type). Gender, age, and polyp size were identified to be risk factors for high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia in adenoma, which could be incorporated in Logistic regression equation: logit P = -2.939 + 1.036X1 (gender) + 0.853X2 (age) + 1.023X3 (polyp diameter). Total cholesterol (TC) and triglyceride (TG) in the low-grade and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia groups were both significantly higher than those in the non-intraepithelial neoplasia group (P < 0.05). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and uric acid (URIC) in the high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia group were both significantly higher than those in the non-intraepithelial neoplasia group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) or CEA among the three groups.
CONCLUSION There is a greater risk of intraepithelial neoplasia among patients older than 40, having villous adenoma with diameter > 1 cm and pedicle. Male, polyp diameter, and age are risk factors for high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia in colorectal adenoma. The occurrence of intraepithelial neoplasia in adenoma may be related to blood lipids and uric acid levels.
Collapse
|
2
|
Choi WS, Han DS, Eun CS, Park DI, Byeon JS, Yang DH, Jung SA, Lee SK, Hong SP, Park CH, Lee SH, Ji JS, Shin SJ, Keum B, Kim HS, Choi JH, Jung SH. Three-year colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy in Korea: a Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KASID) multicenter prospective study. Intest Res 2018; 16:126-133. [PMID: 29422807 PMCID: PMC5797259 DOI: 10.5217/ir.2018.16.1.126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2017] [Revised: 07/19/2017] [Accepted: 08/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims Colonoscopic surveillance is currently recommended after polypectomy owing to the risk of newly developed colonic neoplasia. However, few studies have investigated colonoscopy surveillance in Asia. This multicenter and prospective study was undertaken to assess the incidence of advanced adenoma based on baseline adenoma findings at 3 years after colonoscopic polypectomy. Methods A total of 1,323 patients undergoing colonoscopic polypectomy were prospectively assigned to 3-year colonoscopy surveillance at 11 tertiary endoscopic centers. Relative risks for advanced adenoma after 3 years were calculated according to baseline adenoma characteristics. Results Among 1,323 patients enrolled, 387 patients (29.3%) were followed up, and the mean follow-up interval was 31.0±9.8 months. The percentage of patients with advanced adenoma on baseline colonoscopy was higher in the surveillance group compared to the non-surveillance group (34.4% vs. 25.7%). Advanced adenoma recurrence was observed in 17 patients (4.4%) at follow-up. The risk of advanced adenoma recurrence was 2 times greater in patients with baseline advanced adenoma than in those with baseline non-advanced adenoma, though the difference was not statistically significant (6.8% [9/133] vs. 3.1% [8/254], P=0.09). Advanced adenoma recurrence was observed only in males and in subjects aged ≥50 years. In contrast, adenoma recurrence was observed in 187 patients (48.3%) at follow-up. Male sex, older age (≥50 years), and multiple adenomas (≥3) at baseline were independent risk factors for adenoma recurrence. Conclusions A colonoscopy surveillance interval of 3 years in patients with baseline advanced adenoma can be considered appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Won Seok Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Korea
| | - Dong Soo Han
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Korea
| | - Chang Soo Eun
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Korea
| | - Dong Il Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong-Sik Byeon
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong-Hoon Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung-Ae Jung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Kil Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Pil Hong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Cheol Hee Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Medical Center, Anyang, Korea
| | - Suck-Ho Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Jeong-Seon Ji
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, Incheon, Korea
| | - Sung Jae Shin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ajou University School of Medinie, Suwon, Korea
| | - Bora Keum
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Soo Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Jung Hye Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Korea
| | - Sin-Ho Jung
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|