1
|
Park SB, Kim SJ, Lee J, Lee YJ, Baek DH, Seo GS, Kim ES, Kim SW, Kim SY. Efficacy of sigmoidoscopy for evaluating disease activity in patients with ulcerative colitis. BMC Gastroenterol 2022; 22:83. [PMID: 35220941 PMCID: PMC8882296 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02178-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Endoscopic assessment of disease activity is a key parameter in the management of ulcerative colitis. Whether sigmoidoscopy alone is sufficient to evaluate the disease activity in ulcerative colitis lacks studies.
Methods We retrospectively analyzed the medical records and endoscopic results of patients with ulcerative colitis followed by colonoscopy in seven tertiary hospitals between January 2012 and December 2018. Endoscopic disease activity was scored using the Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) and Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) for each segment from the colonoscopy images. Concordance was evaluated by comparing the highest MES and UCEIS in the rectosigmoid and proximal regions to confirm the usefulness of sigmoidoscopy. Results A total of 500 colonoscopic examinations from 333 patients were enrolled. Only in 7.6% [k(kappa): 0.893, r(Spearman): 0.906, p < 0.001] and 8.6% [k(kappa): 0.890, r(Spearman): 0.914; p < 0.001] of cases, MES and UCEIS scored more severely in the proximal colon. Comparison of active disease (MES ≥ 2) in the rectosigmoid area and the entire colon showed a high concordance rate [k(kappa): 0.899, r(Spearman): 0.904, p < 0.001]. Endoscopic healing (MES = 0) also showed a high concordance rate [k(kappa): 0.882, r(Spearman): 0.887, p < 0.001]. In 38 cases (7.6%) of patients with a higher MES in the proximal area, it was significantly higher in patients with previous extensive colitis. Conclusions Sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy showed a high concordance rate. Therefore, sigmoidoscopy is considered a sufficient substitute for colonoscopy. However, colonoscopy should be considered in patients with previous extensive colitis. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-022-02178-0.
Collapse
|
2
|
Jung Y, Kim JW, Im JP, Cho YK, Lee TH, Jang JY. Safety of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Korea: A Nationwide Survey and Population-Based Study. J Korean Med Sci 2022; 37:e24. [PMID: 35075823 PMCID: PMC8787800 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Attention should be paid to endoscopy-related complications and safety-related accidents that may occur in the endoscopy unit. This study investigated the current status of complications associated with diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy in Korea. METHODS A questionnaire survey on endoscopy-related complications was conducted in a total of 50 tertiary or general hospitals in Korea. The results were compared to the population-level claims data from the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service (HIRA), which analyzed endoscopy procedures conducted in 2017 in Korea. RESULTS The incidences of bleeding associated with diagnostic and therapeutic esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and with diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy were 0.224% and 3.155% and 0.198% and 0.356%, respectively, in the 2017 HIRA claims data, compared to 0.012% and 1.857%, and 0.024% and 0.717%, in the 50 hospitals surveyed. The incidences of perforation associated with diagnostic and therapeutic EGD and with diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy were 0.023% and 0.613%, and 0.007% and 0.013%, respectively, in the 2017 HIRA claims data compared to 0.001% and 0.325%, and 0.017% and 0.206%, in the 50 hospitals surveyed. In the HIRA claims data, the incidence of bleeding/perforation after diagnostic colonoscopy in clinics, community hospitals, general hospitals, and tertiary hospitals was 0.129%/0.000%, 0.088%/0.004%, 0.262%/0.009%, and 0.479%/0.030% respectively, and the corresponding incidence of bleeding/perforation after therapeutic colonoscopy was 0.258%/0.004%, 0.401%/0.007%, 0.408%/0.024%, and 0.731%/0.055%. CONCLUSION The incidences of complications associated with diagnostic and therapeutic EGD or colonoscopy tended to increase with the hospital volume in Korea. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0001728.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunho Jung
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Jung-Wook Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Pil Im
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yu Kyung Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Hee Lee
- Institute for Digestive Research, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae-Young Jang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
SAFETY IN THE GASTROENTEROLOGY SETTING. Gastroenterol Nurs 2021; 44:467-479. [PMID: 34519675 DOI: 10.1097/sga.0000000000000626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
4
|
Park SY, Lee JK, Kim JW, Lee TH, Park CH, Jang JY, Kim BW, Jang BI. A Nationwide Survey on the Facilities and Personnel for Endoscopic Sedation: Results from 50 Qualified Endoscopy Units of Teaching Hospitals Accredited by the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (KSGE). Clin Endosc 2021; 54:843-850. [PMID: 34256557 PMCID: PMC8652162 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2021.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims This study aimed to determine the current status of facilities, equipment, and personnel for endoscopic sedation from endoscopy units of representative hospitals in South Korea.
Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted on 50 qualified endoscopy units accredited by the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
Results All included endoscopy units had regulations and educational programs regarding sedation training for endoscopists and nursing personnel. There present one assisting nurse during endoscopy in 35 units (70%) and at least two nurses in 12 units (24.0%). All endoscopy units had examination rooms equipped with oxygen supply and suction systems. Endoscopist-directed sedation was performed in 48 units (96.0%). Propofol-based sedation was the most used sedation method. All units had a separate recovery bay. The daily number of patients per bed was greater than 10 in 17 units (34.0%). In 26 (52.0%) units, a single nurse cared for ≥10 patients per day. All the units fulfilled the discharge criteria.
Conclusions This study presents data regarding endoscopic sedation clinical practice in 50 endoscopy units in South Korea. This study presents the current status of endoscopic sedation clinical practice in 50 qualified endoscopy units accredited by the KSGE, which provide excellent quality management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seon-Young Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Jun Kyu Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jung-Wook Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Hee Lee
- Institute for Digestive Research, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang-Hwan Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Jae-Yong Jang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byung-Wook Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea
| | - Byung Ik Jang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shin R, Lee S, Han KS, Sohn DK, Moon SH, Choi DH, Kye BH, Son HJ, Lee SI, Si S, Kang WK. Guidelines for accreditation of endoscopy units: quality measures from the Korean Society of Coloproctology. Ann Surg Treat Res 2021; 100:154-165. [PMID: 33748029 PMCID: PMC7943281 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2021.100.3.154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Revised: 11/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Colonoscopy is an effective method of screening for colorectal cancer (CRC), and it can prevent CRC by detection and removal of precancerous lesions. The most important considerations when performing colonoscopy screening are the safety and satisfaction of the patient and the diagnostic accuracy. Accordingly, the Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP) herein proposes an optimal level of standard performance to be used in endoscopy units and by individual colonoscopists for screening colonoscopy. These guidelines establish specific criteria for assessment of safety and quality in screening colonoscopy. Methods The Colonoscopy Committee of the KSCP commissioned this Position Statement. Expert gastrointestinal surgeons representing the KSCP reviewed the published evidence to identify acceptable quality indicators and indicators that lacked sufficient evidence. Results The KSCP recommends an optimal standard list for quality control of screening colonoscopy in the following 6 categories: training and competency of the colonoscopist, procedural quality, facilities and equipment, performance indicators and auditable outcomes, disinfection of equipment, and sedation and recovery of the patient. Conclusion The KSCP recommends that endoscopy units performing CRC screening evaluate 6 key performance measures during daily practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rumi Shin
- The Colonoscopy Committee, The Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP), Seoul, Korea.,Department of Surgery, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seongdae Lee
- The Colonoscopy Committee, The Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP), Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung-Su Han
- The Colonoscopy Committee, The Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP), Seoul, Korea
| | - Dae Kyung Sohn
- The Colonoscopy Committee, The Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP), Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Hui Moon
- The Colonoscopy Committee, The Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP), Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Hyun Choi
- The Colonoscopy Committee, The Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP), Seoul, Korea
| | - Bong-Hyeon Kye
- The Colonoscopy Committee, The Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP), Seoul, Korea
| | - Hae-Jung Son
- The Colonoscopy Committee, The Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP), Seoul, Korea
| | - Sun Il Lee
- The Colonoscopy Committee, The Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP), Seoul, Korea
| | - Sumin Si
- The Colonoscopy Committee, The Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP), Seoul, Korea
| | - Won-Kyung Kang
- The Colonoscopy Committee, The Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP), Seoul, Korea.,Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Choi YI, Lee JJ, Chung JW, Kim KO, Kim YJ, Kim JH, Park DK, Kwon KA. Efficacy and Patient Tolerability Profiles of Probiotic Solution with Bisacodyl Versus Conventional Cleansing Solution for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9103286. [PMID: 33066237 PMCID: PMC7602042 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9103286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Revised: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Although adequate bowel preparation is essential in screening colonoscopy, patient intolerability to bowel cleansing agents is problematic. Recently, a probiotic mixture solution with bisacodyl emerged to improve patient tolerability. We investigated the efficacy, safety, and patient tolerability profiles of probiotics with bisacodyl versus conventional polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution for bowel preparation for screening colonoscopies in healthy patients in this prospective, randomized, case-control study. In total, 385 volunteers were randomly assigned to receive 2 L of water + 200 mL of probiotic solution (case group, n = 195) or 4 L of PEG solution (control group, n = 190). The efficacy of the bowel cleansing was evaluated using the Ottawa scale system, polyp detection rate, and adenoma detection rate, and the patient tolerability profiles were assessed using a questionnaire. The demographics were not significantly different between groups. When the Ottawa score for each bowel segment was stratified into an adequate vs. inadequate level (Ottawa score ≤ 3 vs. >3), there were no statistical differences between groups in each segment of the colon. There were no significant differences in the polyp and adenoma detection rates between groups (38.42% vs. 32.42, p = 0.30; 25.79% vs. 18.97%, p = 0.11). The case group showed significantly fewer events than the control group, especially nausea, vomiting, and abdominal bloating events. Regarding the overall satisfaction grade, the case group reported significantly more “average” scores (95% vs. 44%, p < 0.001) and were more willing to use the same agents again (90.26% vs. 61.85%, p < 0.001). As patient compliance with bowel preparation agents is associated with an adequate level of bowel cleansing, a probiotic solution with bisacodyl might be a new bowel preparation candidate, especially in patients who show a poor compliance with conventional bowel preparation agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Kwang An Kwon
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +82-32-460-3778; Fax: +82-32-460-3408
| |
Collapse
|