Practical Experiences of Unsuccessful Hemostasis with Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stent Placement for Post-Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Bleeding

Complications of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

Up to 1 in 6 patients will experience an unplanned hospitalization after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), largely for the evaluation and management of adverse events. Therefore, a commitment to the prevention, early recognition, and effective rescue of complications related to ERCP is critical toward improving outcomes. ERCP is most often complicated by acute pancreatitis, bleeding, infection, or perforation, although myriad other adverse events may occur. The prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis has been the area of greatest interest and progress in the last decade, but the application of evidence-based prophylactic measures remains inconsistent. Innovations in stent, hemostasis, and perforation closure technology now allow effective and efficient endoscopic management of several important nonpancreatitis complications. Overall, our ability to prevent and treat ERCP-related adverse events has improved substantially, amplifying the importance of a high level of suspicion for and a thorough understanding of these events.

Effectiveness and safety of a new clip for delivery using a duodenoscope for bleeding after endoscopic sphincterotomy

Background and study aims Hemostasis for post-endoscopic sphincterotomy (post-EST) bleeding involves no standard strategy. New clips designed for delivery using the duodenoscope (SureClip, Micro-Tech, Nanjing, China) have been utilized for gastrointestinal bleeding hemostasis and bleeding prevention after polypectomy and papillectomy. We retrospectively analyzed the effectiveness and safety of SureClip for post-EST bleeding. Patients and methods Of 608 patients with endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST), 41 cases (6.7%) experienced post-EST bleeding from 2019 to 2023. Of these patients, 24 underwent hemostasis by SureClip, and the success rate of complete hemostasis and complication by hemostasis by SureClip was analyzed. Results In 12 and 12 patients with urgent and delayed bleeding, 11 (91.7%) and 11 (91.7%) had successful hemostasis, respectively. In addition, missed patients achieved complete hemostasis with additional transcatheter arterial embolization and balloon compression, respectively. No complications were observed, including perforation, pancreatitis, and clipping bile duct and pancreatic duct by mistake. Conclusions Hemostasis with SureClip is safe, effective, and not expensive for post-EST bleeding. It could be the first choice for hemostasis in patients with post-EST bleeding refractory to balloon compression.

Application of a New Hemostatic Clip to Prevent Delayed Bleeding After Endoscopic Sphincterotomy: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Delayed bleeding after endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) is a serious adverse event of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of prevent delayed bleeding of hemostatic clip (Sureclip) after ES.

METHODS

Consecutive patients diagnosed with common bile duct stones with a high risk of delayed bleeding who received ES from January 1, 2013, to July 31, 2022, were analyzed retrospectively. A 1:1 propensity score-matching analysis and logistic regression analysis were used. The patients were allocated into the hemostatic clip and control groups. The rate of delayed bleeding, hyperamylasemia, pancreatitis, and hemostatic clip closing the bile duct or pancreatic duct by mistake were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Overall, 161 and 232 patients were allocated to the control and hemostatic clip groups, respectively, propensity score matching created 120 matched pairs. The rate of delayed bleeding was significantly lower in the hemostatic clip group than in the control group (1.67% vs. 7.5%, P =0.031). After adjusting for confounding factors, logistic regression showed hemostatic clip was associated with decreased odds of delayed bleeding (0.134, 95% CI: 0.025-0.719). No case of hemostatic clip closing the bile duct or pancreatic duct by mistake occurred in the hemostatic clip group. No significant differences were observed in postoperative hyperamylasemia and pancreatitis between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicated that the prophylactic application of a hemostatic clip is associated with a significantly reduced rate of delayed bleeding after ES in high-risk patients. This approach did not increase the risk of adverse event.