Elbow reconstruction using island flap for burn patients

[Current role of the latissimus dorsi flap in traumatology: Analysis of the activity of a plastic surgery department in a military hospital]

Reconstructive surgery's workhorse, the latissimus dorsi flap is increasingly abandoned in favour of fasciocutaneous flaps. The purpose of this study was to analyse the methods used to perform this flap and the evolution of its indications in order to define its current place in traumatology. Forty-four cases were recorded retrospectively from January 2000 to December 2020 at HIA Percy, including 37 cases of free flaps, mainly performed for reconstruction of extensive loss of substance with bone and/or joint exposure. It was also performed in 10.8% of cases for salvage after failure of an alternative reconstruction solution. This analysis confirms the value of the latissimus dorsi flap in cases of significant substance loss in the lower limb, but also in burn patients for functional rehabilitation or to allow early rehabilitation.

Flap survival and functional outcomes in elbow soft tissue reconstruction: A 25-year systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Different elbow flap reconstructions have been described in the literature. We aim to define the optimal flap technique based on defect size and etiology.

METHODS

A systematic review was undertaken using the terms "(Elbow reconstruction) AND ((Soft tissue) OR (flap))". Flaps were grouped under fasciocutaneous (FCF), muscular (MF), distant pedicled (DPF), and free flaps (FF). The primary outcome was flap survival. The secondary outcomes were postoperative complications and range of motion (pROM).

RESULTS

Twenty articles with 224 patients were included. Defect sizes were small (<10 cm²) (18%), medium (10-30 cm²) (23%), large (30-100 cm²) (43%), and massive (>100 cm²) (16%). Etiologies included trauma (26%), burn contractures (26%), infection (26%), hardware coverage (16%), and others (6%). FCF (54%) was the preferred flap followed by MF (28%), DPF (13%), and FF (5%). The rate of flap necrosis was 4% and that of other complications was 10%. The postoperative range of motion (pROM) (reported in 154 patients) was >100°, 50-100°, and <50° in 82%, 17%, and 1% of the cases, respectively. Small defects were most commonly reconstructed with MFs (83%), medium defects were reconstructed with MFs (52%) or FCFs (46%), and large defects were reconstructed with FCFs (91%). Massive defects predominantly required DPFs (60%) and FFs (26%). FCFs were the most common reconstruction method for burn contractures (84%), infections (55%), and traumatic defects (51%). Hardware coverage was predominantly performed using MFs (86%). No difference in complications and pROM was found between flap techniques.

CONCLUSION

Elbow flap reconstruction can be performed using different techniques. FCFs are the most commonly used reconstruction method. MFs are useful for smaller defects and hardware coverage. DPFs and FFs are needed for massive injuries.

Innovative adaptation of the "spare tissues concept" applied for olecranon coverage of a severe burn patient: A case report

BACKGROUND

The management of bone exposure in patients with extensive burns could be a challenge due to the lack of healthy tissue. In such cases, it could be interesting to use any still healthy tissue initially destined for amputation and use it to cover up another site. We present the case of a sever burn patient for whom we used the only healthy palmar hand skin to cover an olecranon exposure.

CLINICAL CASE DESCRIPTION

A 38-year-old man has been admitted in burn victim unit with extensive deep burns on 60% of the total body surface. An exposure of the left olecranon was appeared occurring on a burned area, with absence of healthy local tissues available for coverage. Concomitantly a trans-radial amputation was indicated because of severe digits burns leading to an impossibility to preserve the function of the hand. A palmar skin area was healthy leading to harvested this palmar skin flap pedicled on ulnar vessels. Early post-operative healing was satisfactory and no vascular suffering of the flap has been observed with a total healing at three weeks.

CONCLUSION

In any patient the spare tissues concept should be keep in mind when amputation is indicated simultaneously with a problematic of loss of substance coverage to a proximity area. In this case of severe burn patient, we used a palmar skin flap pedicled on the ulnar vessels to cover an olecranon exposure.