Closure of a full-thickness scalp burn that occurred during hair coloring using a simple skin-stretching method: A case report and review of the literature

Chemical Scalp Burn after Hair Coloring-Case Report with Literature Review

Hair dyeing is widely performed around the world. Chemical and thermal burns can result from the components present in brightening and coloring products, as well as the application process. We present a case of a chemical burn after applying hair dye and review the literature on similar cases, the composition of hair dyes, their mechanism of action, and the process of burns. The patient was a 17-year-old girl, who presented to the Dermatology Clinic with a 13 × 10 cm ulcer on the scalp after hair dyeing in a hairdressing salon. General and local treatment was applied, with particular emphasis on specialized dressings. The ulcer site was replaced by an area of scarring after 11 months of treatment. Based on the presented case and the review of the literature, we conclude that hair dye treatments warrant careful attention for potential scalp complications. The diagnostic and therapeutic approach demands a multidisciplinary effort, with ongoing patient-doctor cooperation throughout the treatment, which may complicate and span several months.

Application of Skin-stretching Device for Closing Scalp Defect

BACKGROUND

The scalp defect was a clinical common constructive challenge. This research verified the efficacy of the skin-stretching device in the treatment of scalp defect and assessed the associated complications.

METHODS

The clinical data of 12 patients with scalp defect treated with skin-stretching device from January 2020 to January 2021 were collected. We used EASApprox skin-stretching device for the treatment of scalp defect. We described a detailed reconstruction procedure for this treatment. We collected the site, distance from wound edge and other characteristics of the wound, and recorded the number of stretching cycles, operation time, closed state, healing time, and observed postoperative complications and wound healing status.

RESULTS

In this research, the scalp defect was mainly caused by pressure ulcer, and mainly located in the parietooccipital site. The average distance from wound edge was 3.2 cm, the average stretching cycles was 4.2 times during the operation, and the average operation time was 43.5 minutes. Ten patients were directly sutured after stretching, and 2 patients underwent first-stage stretching to reduce the wound. The average time of wound healing was 13.5 days. Postoperative follow-up of 3 months, no patients had wound tear, necrosis, 1 patient suffered from wound exudation and infection due to poor nutrition. Skin function and final scar was acceptable.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of skin-stretching device was effective for scalp defect and has the advantages of convenient operation, acceptable functional results, without severe complications. In addition to traditional treatment, this was a promising treatment. However, more clinical and preclinical research of the skin-stretching device were required.

Surgical treatment of pressure ulcer: various flaps and other surgical methods

Pressure ulcers remain a common health problem, particularly among physically limited or bedridden older adults, and they can cause significant morbidity and mortality. Conservative management is ineffective for stage III or IV pressure ulcers, and surgery to create flap coverage becomes inevitable. Basic surgical principles for the treatment of pressure ulcers include complete excision of the ulcer, surrounding scar, underlying bursa, and soft tissue calcification; radical removal of underlying bone and any heterotropic ossification; padding of bone stumps and filling dead space; resurfacing with large regional pedicled flaps; and grafting the donor site of the flap, if necessary. For effective edge resection, all the flaps should be designed to be as large as possible, placing the suture line away from the area of direct pressure, and the flap design should also not violate adjacent flap territories to preserve all options for coverage if a breakdown or recurrence dictates further reconstruction. There are surgical methods for stage III or IV wide range pressure ulcers: reconstruction surgery using a skin flap, muscle flap, fascia-skin flap, or free flap. The skin graft is not generally recommended as a surgical procedure for stage III or IV pressure ulcers because it cannot provide enough strength to cover the wound. This review presents various surgical treatments of pressure ulcers including muscle, musculocutaneous, perforator-based, and free flap.