Chest wall perforator flaps for partial breast reconstruction: Surgical outcomes from a multicenter study

The Local Rhombus-Shaped Flap-An Easy and Reliable Technique for Oncoplastic Breast Cancer Surgery and Defect Closure in Breast and Axilla

Primarily, breast-conserving therapy is an oncological intervention, but eventually it is judged by its cosmetic result. Remaining cavities from tumor resection can promote seromas, delay healing and cause lasting discomfort. Additionally, volume loss, dislocation of nipple/areola and fat necrosis lead to (cosmetically) unfavorable results, aggravated by radiotherapy. Oncoplastic surgery can reduce these sequelae. A local flap that has rarely been used in breast cancer surgery is the Limberg rhombic flap. The tumor defect is planned as a rhombus. The sides of the rhombus are of equal length and ideally have an angle of 60° and 120°. The flap that closes the defect is planned as an extension of equal length of the short diagonal. The second incision of the flap is placed according to the defect angle of 60°, running parallel to the defect at the same length. This creates a second rhombus. The flap is transposed into the defect, and the donor area is primarily closed. It is axially perfused and safe with a 1:1 length-to-width ratio. Compared to local perforator flaps, defect closure is easily managed without microsurgical skills. In the breast, the flap can be used in volume replacement and volume displacement techniques as an all-layer flap to cover defects, or it can be deepithelialized and buried. In the axilla, it can cover full-thickness defects when skin is involved. The advantages of the rhombic flap are its safety and simplicity to add volume and close defects, thus reducing the complexity of oncoplastic surgery.

Local Flaps in Breast-Conserving Surgery in Early Breast Cancer Patients: Armamentarium for Breast Surgeon

To describe the technique and outcome of local perforator arteries advancement flap in breast-conserving surgeries (BCS) in patient of early breast cancer as our initial experience and review of literature on it. Patients who underwent (BCS) with local perforator artery flap reconstruction were reviewed in terms of their clinical, surgical, and post-operative follow-up details after taking written and informed consent. We have described 4 patients of early breast cancer out of which one patient was post-NACT while 3 were for upfront BCS. We have performed LICAP in 2 patients, AICAP in 1 patient, and IMAP in one patient, depending on the location of primary tumors. None of the patients had any major or minor surgical complications in the post-operative period and drains were removed on post-operative day 2. All patients received post-operative radiotherapy and tolerated well without any loco-regional complications. Patients are in routine follow-up with cosmetic satisfaction without any local recurrence over 1 year. The main advantages of pedicled perforator flaps are well-vascularized tissue, spares underlying muscle leading to lesser donor site morbidity like muscle function and seroma formation, easily reach the breast area with good match in terms of skin and subcutaneous tissue, faster recovery, and shorter learning curve in comparison to free flaps. Knowledge and skill about these flaps will help surgeon to give better surgical outcomes and satisfaction to patients.

A prospective study evaluating patient reported outcome measures in patients who have undergone chest wall perforator flaps

AIMS

To evaluate Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and surgical outcomes in patients undergoing Chest Wall Perforator Flaps (CWPFs).

METHODS

This was an observational single cohort study using an audit approach and a survey instrument. 84 patients who had undergone CWPFs in the last 5 years at the Department of Breast Surgery, City Hospital Birmingham, were identified from a pre-existing database. Surgical outcomes were recorded. Patients were contacted telephonically or in person at the time of follow-up and were asked to fill up a PROMs questionnaire.

RESULTS

Out of 84 patients, 58 patients chose to respond. The average age of the patients was 51.3 years (±8.2 years). The average follow-up was 15.4 months (±9.9 months). The most common histological subtype was Infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC)-Not otherwise specified 34/58 (58.6%). Majority of the patients had T2 cancers-28/58 (48.3%). 26/58 (44.8%) were node negative. Eight patients (13.7%) had post-operative complications. No patient had total/partial flap loss. Nine patients (15.5%) had margin re-excision. One patient developed distant metastasis while 1 patient developed a second primary. Fifty-one patients (88%) were either satisfied or very satisfied with the post-operative appearance of the breasts. Thirty-six patients (62%) had no/little persistent pain or tenderness post-surgery. Eighty-six per cent (38/44) of the patients undergoing Lateral Intercostal Artery Perforator (LICAP) Flap and 16/18 (89%) of patients undergoing Anterior Intercostal Artery Perforator (AICAP) flap had no/little difficulty in carrying out normal activities at follow up.

CONCLUSION

CWPFs are associated with a low complication rate and a high patient satisfaction rate.

Adipose perforator flaps without skin donor site: "in between" single scar approach for reconstruction of small peripheral breast defects after lumpectomy

In breast conserving surgery, the reconstruction of defects in small breasts where volume displacement techniques are not feasible can be challenging. In contrast, patients with bigger breasts may not wish to undergo major breast remodeling surgery or breast symmetrization procedures. In such cases, volume replacement techniques can be beneficial, but these leave additional scars and are time consuming. The authors propose an "in between" single scar approach to perform both lumpectomy and reconstruction of small peripheral breast tumors. This approach reduces morbidity and operating time compared with standard volume replacement techniques. The tumors are resected from below, guided by wire, using an incision in the lateral breast crease or inframammary fold, depending on their location. The same incision is used to raise an adipose or adipofascial flap based on perimammary perforators, lateral thoracic artery perforator flap (LTAP), lateral intercostal artery perforator flap (LICAP), or anterior intercostal artery perforator flaps (AICAP) flaps, without skin donor site. Between March and November 2022, eight patients underwent this procedure. In four cases LICAP flap was used; in three-AICAP flap was chosen; and in one-LTAP perforator flap was used. Clear surgical margins were achieved in all cases. The average follow-up time was 9.9 months, during which no local recurrences were detected. All flaps survived. Two patients experienced seromas at the donor site, and an organized hematoma was also reported. This approach represents a viable alternative to volume displacement techniques or no reconstruction for small peripheral lumpectomy defects.

Chest wall perforator flap partial breast reconstruction: a retrospective analysis of surgical, cosmetic and survival outcome

Introduction

Oncoplastic breast surgery includes volume replacement as well as volume displacement. Autologous tissue is the preferred approach for volume replacement and includes chest wall perforator flaps (CWPF). Although described more than a decade ago, CWPFs have not been adopted widely in clinical practice till recently. We report the largest single-centre institutional data on CWPFs.

Patients and methods

The study includes all patients who underwent breast conservation surgery (BCS) using CWPFs from January 2015 to December 2022. Data were retrieved from the institutional electronic record and Redcap database. The analysis was done using SPSS 23 and STATA 14.

Results

150 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 48.8 years (SD 10.4), and the body mass index was (26.6 kg/m2, SD 4.3). >50% of patients had breasts with small cup sizes (A&B) and mild ptosis (Non-ptotic and Grade 1 ptosis). 44.7% of patients underwent lateral intercostal artery perforator flap (LICAP), anterior intercostal artery perforator flap in 31.3%, lateral thoracic perforator flap (LTAP) in 12%, LICAP + LTAP in 11.3% and thoracodorsal artery perforator flap in 1%. Post-operatively, haematoma was seen in 1.3%, complete flap necrosis in 1.3%, seroma in 7%, wound dehiscence in 12%, and positive margin in 6.7%. 92 patients responded to the satisfaction assessment, of which >90% were happy with the surgical scars, comfortable going out in a public place, satisfied with the symmetry of the breast, and no one chose mastectomy in hindsight. The 5-year predicted disease free survival and overall survival were 86.4% and 94.7%, respectively.

Conclusion

BCS with CWPF is an excellent option for reconstruction in small to medium-sized breasts. It is associated with minimal morbidity and comparable patient-reported cosmetic and survival outcomes.

The Ultrasound Evolution of Lateral Thoracic Perforator Flaps Design and Harvest for Partial and Total Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The lateral thoracic area is a known source for perforator flaps for partial breast reconstruction. In this paper, we report our experience in designing and harvesting lateral thoracic perforator flaps for partial and total breast reconstruction with the introduction of the "propuller" concept.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between September 2013 and August 2021, 95 flaps were performed for immediate, partial and total breast reconstruction. On a total of 95 flaps, 30 (19 thoracodorsal artery perforator(TDAP) flaps, 10 lateral intercostal artery perforator(LICAP) flaps and 1 lateral thoracic artery perforator(LTAP) flap) were harvested in the traditional fashion (control group) and 65 (57 LICAP, 2 LTAP and 6 TDAP flaps) according to the propeller concept (study group). All cases were preoperatively planned with Color-Coded Duplex Ultrasound.

RESULTS

No flap losses were experienced in both groups. The mean operative time was 156 minutes (range 118-234) for the control group and 75 minutes (range 53-125) for the study group (p < 0.0001). A significantly higher number of LICAP flaps were chosen in the study group compared to control group. None of the patients had donor site complications. Patients' and Surgeons' satisfaction was high to very high.

CONCLUSION

The ultrasound preoperative planning led to the development of an easier and safer method of local perforator flap harvesting, that we named as propuller design. Its novelty lies in that perforator intraoperative selection and fully skeletonization are not needed and a more efficient flap movement (propeller plus advancement) which transfers more tissue into the new breast can be achieved safely, faster and easier.

Chest wall perforator flaps for partial breast reconstruction after conservative surgery: Prospective analysis of safety and reliability

INTRODUCTION

Breast-conserving surgery associated with adjuvant radiotherapy is the state of the art in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. Oncoplastic surgery through dermo-adipose flaps based in perforating arteries (muscle sparing flaps) for partial reconstruction is increasingly used as a good option for avoiding musculocutaneous flaps. In this study we evaluate the outcomes of the use of chest wall perforator flaps in the replacement of partial breast volume.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study of female patients that underwent a conservative oncoplastic surgery procedure with partial breast reconstruction using a dermo-adipose flap of perforating arteries of the chest wall was conducted between November 2020 and March 2022 at our centre. Primary outcomes were surgical morbidity, positive margins and reoperation rates. Characteristics associated with the occurrence of complications were further identified.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients underwent the procedure of interest during the study period. The mean age was 55 years. The median larger dimension of the tumor was 23 mm. Lateral intercostal artery perforator (LICAP), lateral thoracic artery perforator (LTAP), a combined flap and Anterior Intercostal Artery Perforator/Medial Intercostal Artery Perforator (AICAP)/(MICAP) were performed in 22, 16, 2 and 5 patients, respectively. The mean operative time was 126 min. A total of 9 (20.0%) patients required a reoperation after definitive diagnosis, 4 due to positive margins and 5 due to immediate/early surgical morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Local perforator flaps in oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery are a good option for immediate reconstruction after conservative surgery, showing low morbidity and favourable outcomes.

No Doppler Single Position-Lateral Intercostal Artery Perforator Flap (NDSP-LICAP): a Safe and Versatile Flap for Breast Oncoplasty in Resource-Limited Setting

INTRODUCTION

The lateral intercostal artery perforator flap (LICAP) has emerged as one of the safest and less morbid flaps for lateral and central breast defects. We hereby describe a reproducible no Doppler single position (NDSP) technique to harvest it in single position without handheld Doppler, making it a versatile flap for lateral breast defects in resource-limited setting also.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

With this technique, we performed a total of 22 LICAP turnover flaps over a period of 18 months from January 2020 to June 2021. In all 22 cases, the indication of flap was to fill the post-breast conservation surgery (BCS) defects in outer quadrant of breast. All LICAP flaps were harvested by surface marking of anatomical landmarks and without handheld Doppler.

RESULTS

Out of 22 LICAP turnover flaps, thirteen were harvested for left breast and nine for right breast. The median width and length of the flap were 12.2 cm and 19.6 cm, respectively. The additional mean operative time was 41 min. All LICAP flaps survived well, and grade 1 Clavien-Dindo morbidity was documented in four cases. Mean hospital stay was 2.6 days. All patients received radiotherapy on their stipulated schedule. Early cosmetic outcome was good, and long-term outcomes are awaited.

CONCLUSION

NDSP-LICAP flap is a workhorse for lateral breast defects. Precise knowledge of perforators and anatomical landmarks can be used for harvesting these flaps, thus avoiding ultrasound Doppler and dedicated training for perforator localization. This technique has short learning curve without the need for any plastic surgery training. The early cosmetic outcomes are good.

'PartBreCon' study. A UK multicentre retrospective cohort study to assess outcomes following PARTial BREast reCONstruction with chest wall perforator flaps

BACKGROUND

Partial breast reconstruction with a pedicled chest wall perforator flap (CWPF) enables breast conservation in a higher tumour: breast volume ratio scenario. Since there is limited evidence, this retrospective cohort study aimed to ascertain immediate (30-days) and medium-term (follow-up duration) surgical outcomes.

METHODS

STROBE-compliant protocol ascertained CWPF outcomes between March 2011-March 2021. UK centres known to perform CWPF were invited to participate if they performed at least 10 cases. Data were retrospectively collected, including patient demographics, tumour and treatment characteristics, and surgical and oncological outcomes. Statistical analysis (R™) included multivariable logistic regression and sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

Across 15 centres, 507 patients with median age (54 years, IQR; 48-62), body mass index (25.4 kg/m2, IQR; 22.5-29), tumour size (26 mm, IQR; 18-35), and specimen weight (62 g, IQR; 40-92) had following flap types: LiCAP (54.1%, n = 273), MiCAP/AiCAP (19.6%, n = 99), LiCAP + LTAP (19.8%, n = 100) and TDAP (2.2%, n = 11). 30-days complication rates were in 12%: haematoma (4.3%, n = 22), wound infection (4.3%, n = 22), delayed wound healing (2.8%, n = 14) and flap loss (0.6%, n = 3; 1 full) leading to readmissions (2.6%, n = 13) and re-operations (2.6%, n = 13). Positive margins (n = 88, 17.7%) led to 15.9% (n = 79) re-excisions, including 7.5% (n = 37) at the planned 2nd of 2-stage surgery and 1.8% (n = 9) mastectomy. At median 23 months (IQR; 11-39) follow-up, there were 1.2% (n = 6) symmetrisations; recurrences: local (1%), regional/nodal (0.6%) and distant (3.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

This large multicentre cohort study demonstrates acceptable complication and margin re-excision rates. CWPF extends the range of breast conservation techniques. Further studies are required for long-term oncological outcomes.

The Versatility of Lateral Chest Wall Perforator Flaps in Immediate and Delayed Breast Reconstruction: Retrospective Study of Clinical Experience with 26 Patients

Rationale: Lateral chest flaps represent versatile reconstructive options, especially valuable in times of global healthcare resource restriction. In this series, we present our experience with the use of lateral chest wall flaps in both immediate and delayed reconstruction from both breast conserving and mastectomy surgery. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients who had undergone a lateral chest wall flap for immediate or delayed breast reconstruction of a lumpectomy or mastectomy defect was performed. Data collected consisted of patient demographics, procedure type, tumor/oncological characteristics, as well as postoperative complications. Findings: Between September 2015 and April 2021, 26 patients underwent breast reconstruction using a lateral chest wall flap. Fifteen patients (58%) underwent immediate reconstruction (9 lumpectomy; 6 mastectomy) and 11 (42%) underwent delayed breast reconstruction. All flaps survived, though 1 patient required partial flap debridement following venous compromise hours after surgery. There were no incidences of hematoma, seroma, infection, or wound healing delay at either the donor site or breast. There was one positive margin which occurred in a mastectomy patient. Significance: This study describes the use of lateral chest wall flaps in a wide variety of reconstructive breast surgery scenarios. This technique can be safely performed in an outpatient setting and does not require microvascular techniques. Review of our outcomes and complications demonstrate that this is a safe and effective option. Our experience is that this is an easy to learn, versatile flap that could be a valuable addition to the surgeon's arsenal in breast reconstruction.

Use of tumour bed boost radiotherapy in volume replacement oncoplastic breast surgery: A systematic review

Tumour bed boost radiotherapy (RT) following breast conserving surgery reduces local recurrence in high-risk disease. There is recent debate over challenges to accurately localise tumour bed for RT boost delivery following volume replacement oncoplastic breast surgery (VR-OBS). This review evaluates the reporting of RT boost following VR-OBS in the literature published between January 2010 and December 2021. This review was in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Metaanalysis statement.Nine studies met the inclusion criteria (n=670 patients), and RT boost was used in eight studies. Boost was administered in total to 384 patients (62.5% of irradiated patients). Only two studies reported boost planned target volumes and only one compared these against surgical specimen volumes.RT boost was not reported in most published studies on VR-OBS. Future prospective research are strongly needed to evaluate long-term outcomes of VR-OBS following RT boost, especially on breast cosmesis and patients' satisfaction. DATA AVAILABILITY: Data will be made available upon request.

Impact of Chest Wall Perforator Flaps on Rates of Total Mastectomy in Breast Cancer

Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) outcomes are comparable to mastectomy in breast cancer treatment. However, patients with large tumours were offered mastectomy due to the resulting poor cosmetic sequelae after standard BCS. With the introduction of chest wall perforator flaps (CWPF), BCS is an option in patients with large tumour:breast ratio. The objective of our study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of CWPFs and their impact on mastectomy rates. In order to assess the impact of CWPF on mastectomy rates, patients who underwent breast cancer surgery from January 2016 to December 2019 were included in a cohort named group A. In group A, the type of surgery performed was collected for each year from January 2016 to December 2019. Patients who underwent BCS and CWPF from July 2016 to June 2021 were included in another cohort named group B. In group B, patient-related and disease-specific details including post-operative complications were collected and analysed. In group A, following the introduction of CWPF, the mastectomy rates dropped by 10.69% and the mastectomy with reconstruction rates dropped by 23.29%. In group B, a total of 152 patients underwent CWPF reconstructions. The median tumour size was 20 mm (range = 0-80). A majority of patients were discharged within 24-h hospital stay (98.2%). Seventeen patients (11.11%) had a re-operation for margin positivity. Sixteen patients (10.46%) developed early complications and 19 patients (12.42%) developed delayed complications. CWPFs expand indications for BCS thus reducing mastectomy rates. It also has less morbidity when compared to reported mastectomy and reconstruction rates, thus making it a safe option for suitable patients.

Safety and efficacy of anterior intercostal artery perforator flaps in oncoplastic breast reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Partial breast reconstruction based on the anterior intercostal artery perforators (AICAP) has been suggested to avoid the unsightly 'bird's beak' deformity for lower pole breast cancers. The aims of this study were to evaluate the initial clinical experience of AICAP flaps in terms of safety and efficacy in oncoplastic breast reconstruction.

METHODS

Between October 2013 and April 2020, AICAP flaps were offered to 30 patients with lower pole breast cancers. Hand-held Acoustic Doppler assessments were undertaken to confirm adequate perforators. Surgical results were evaluated in terms of safety and efficacy. Patients were invited to complete sections of the Breast-Q questionnaire at least 12 months postoperatively to assess patient satisfaction in terms of cosmetic outcome, physical and psychosocial wellbeing.

RESULTS

Median operating theatre time for AICAP flap harvesting and positioning was 20 min (range 15-28 min). The median weight of resected breast specimens was 41 g (range 10-127 g). Total tumour size ranged from 7 to 35 mm (median 16 mm; three cases exhibited multifocal disease). Clear radial resection margins were achieved in 29 cases (96.7%). The median post-operative stay was two days (range 2-3 days). There were two postoperative complications comprising delayed wound healing/fat necrosis, which resolved with monitoring and inadine dressings. Based on the Breast-Q results, patients reported high levels of satisfaction with the physical appearance of their reconstructed breast, psychosocial and physical wellbeing.

CONCLUSION

AICAP flaps appear to be safe in restoring breast contour after wide excision of lower pole breast cancers, with high levels of patient satisfaction reported postoperatively.

Partial Breast Reconstruction with Lateral Chest Wall Perforator Flap to Facilitate Breast Conservation in Breast Cancer: First 100 Cases with Cancer Outcomes at 8 Years Follow-Up and the Lessons Learned

Background

This is a prospective cohort study of partial breast reconstruction (PBR) with a lateral chest wall perforator flap (LCWPF) to facilitate breast conservation surgery (BCS) for women undergoing surgery for breast cancer. The study was undertaken to study the clinical and cancer outcomes.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or breast cancer who consented to undergo BCS with PBR with LCWPF were included in the study. A prospective database has been maintained to collect information on clinico-pathological features, complications, and follow-up. Patients were asked to complete an anonymised PROM questionnaire over the years. The hospital electronic records were interrogated for women who have completed 5 years follow-up to assess for development of recurrence/events.

Results

A total of 105 patients underwent PBR with LCWPFs between 2011 and 2018. Of these, 74% underwent cancer resection and PBR as one operation whilst 26% underwent PBR as a two-stage approach. The median tumor size on pre-op imaging was 30 mm for the one-stage approach and 39.5 mm for the two-stage approach (p-value=0.003). The complication rates were low and the re-operation rate for close margins was 10%, with 4% eventually requiring mastectomy. Good-to-excellent esthetic outcomes were reported in more than 80% of cases by patients and clinicians. The local recurrence rate (LR) was 2%, distant recurrence rate 10.5%, disease free survival (DFS) 86%, distant disease-free survival (DDFS) 89% and overall survival (OS) 94.8% at 4.5 years median follow-up. This procedure provides an effective oncological approach, avoiding mastectomy with a good-to-excellent cosmetic outcome. The follow-up data establishes the safety of this approach.

Discussion

This is the first published series of recurrence and survival data in patients undergoing PBR. We intend to continue with data collection to assess long-term outcomes beyond 10 years. The authors would recommend consideration of this technique to facilitate BCS and avoid mastectomy.

Registration

Not applicable.

A Multicentric Prospective Cohort Study of Modified Lateral Intercostal Artery Perforator Flap in Partial Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Oncoplastic breast surgery is well established in many parts of the world and is gaining popularity in the rest of the world. The cornerstone in oncoplastic breast surgery is to respect oncological principles during cancer resection maintaining good aesthetic and cosmetic outcome. With the advancement in local, regional, and systemic treatment for breast cancer, survival has improved, and patients live longer. It is utmost essential to help our patients to maintain a good quality of life. Aesthetic and cosmetic outcomes have a significant impact on patient's psychosocial, emotional, and sexual well-being.Oncoplastic techniques have evolved over the last decade with the increasing use of perforator flaps to enable partial breast reconstruction. We report the findings of a prospective cohort study using modified lateral intercostal artery perforator in partial breast reconstruction. This modified technique offers a less visible scar and good access to the axilla without any need for repositioning the patient during the operative procedure.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent partial breast reconstruction with a modified lateral intercostal artery perforator flap was carried out between July 2016 and January 2020 in 2 oncoplastic breast units. The study had local approval from the respective audit departments. Patient demographics, operative data, surgical complications, and outcomes were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients underwent the procedure between July 2016 and January 2020. The median age of the population data was 58 years (interquartile range, 9 years). There were 10 active smokers (24.4%), and 3 patients had diabetes mellitus (7.3%). Overall, 3 patients (7.1%) developed seroma, 1 had a hematoma (2.4%), and 1 had a locoregional recurrence (2.4%). Two patients (4.9%) underwent margin re-excision for close margins. Most patients (92%) had the procedure carried out as day-case surgery. None of the patients developed wound infection, necrosis, or flap loss. The results were comparable across the 2 participating units.

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest that modified intercostal artery perforator flap is an excellent oncoplastic technique for volume replacement in partial breast reconstruction with a short learning curve and minimal perioperative morbidity.

Comparison of Surgical and Oncological Outcomes between Chest Wall Perforator Flaps and Therapeutic Mammoplasty

Background:

Chest wall perforator flaps (CPF) and therapeutic mammoplasty (TM) are often done in patients with anticipated poor cosmetic outcome with level 1 breast conservation surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the complications and oncological outcomes between CPF and TM.

Methods:

Prospectively collected data of breast conservation surgery between September 2016 and January 2021 by a single surgeon were reviewed. Specific outcomes included complications needing intervention, re-excision and mastectomy rate, locoregional recurrence, and distant metastasis. Patients were followed up at 3 months and then every 12 months. Statistical analysis included chi-squared test and independent t test, and a P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results:

There was no statistically significant difference between CPF and TM with regard to patient characteristics except for BMI and bra cup size, which was significantly higher in the TM group. One patient who had TM returned to the operating room for a hematoma evacuation, and one patient who had CPF had fat grafting, for unsatisfactory cosmetic outcome. Five of the 30 patients having CPF had further re-excision surgery for inadequate margins, but none needed mastectomy, and four of the 43 patients having TM had further surgery (one had re-excision of margins and three had mastectomy) and this was not statistically significant (P = 0.346). There was no locoregional recurrence in CPF and TM groups after a median follow-up of 22 months and 25 months, respectively.

Conclusion:

There is no significant difference in early complications and oncological outcomes between CPF and TM.

Comparison of Surgical and Oncological Outcomes between Chest Wall Perforator Flaps and Therapeutic Mammoplasty

BACKGROUND

Chest wall perforator flaps (CPF) and therapeutic mammoplasty (TM) are often done in patients with anticipated poor cosmetic outcome with level 1 breast conservation surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the complications and oncological outcomes between CPF and TM.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data of breast conservation surgery between September 2016 and January 2021 by a single surgeon were reviewed. Specific outcomes included complications needing intervention, re-excision and mastectomy rate, locoregional recurrence, and distant metastasis. Patients were followed up at 3 months and then every 12 months. Statistical analysis included chi-squared test and independent t test, and a P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between CPF and TM with regard to patient characteristics except for BMI and bra cup size, which was significantly higher in the TM group. One patient who had TM returned to the operating room for a hematoma evacuation, and one patient who had CPF had fat grafting, for unsatisfactory cosmetic outcome. Five of the 30 patients having CPF had further re-excision surgery for inadequate margins, but none needed mastectomy, and four of the 43 patients having TM had further surgery (one had re-excision of margins and three had mastectomy) and this was not statistically significant (P = 0.346). There was no locoregional recurrence in CPF and TM groups after a median follow-up of 22 months and 25 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

There is no significant difference in early complications and oncological outcomes between CPF and TM.

Outcomes in volume replacement and volume displacement techniques in oncoplastic breast conserving surgery: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Volume Replacement (VR-OBCS) and Volume Displacement Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery (VD-OBCS) are commonly used in the management of breast cancer. Many studies summarize the individual postoperative outcomes of these two procedures; however, there is a lack of research that compares outcomes of these approaches. This review summarizes the available VR and VD-OBCS literature in terms of oncological, cosmetic, and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

An online literature search (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and CINAHL) was performed. Studies were included if they were written in English, had more than 10 adult (18+) female patients who underwent VR-OBCS or VD-OBCS, and reported at least one well-described oncological, clinical, or cosmetic outcome RESULTS: Thirty-three studies (26 VR-OBCS and 7 VD-OBCS) were included in this review; VR-OBCS studies were separated based on the use of latissimus dorsi (LD) flaps. Studies utilizing VR-OBCS with LD flaps reported the highest rate of all oncological outcomes; VR-OBCS studies without LD flaps reported the lowest. Rates of hematoma, seroma, and wound dehiscence were highest in VR-OBCS with LD flaps; partial flap loss and fat necrosis were highest in VR-OBCS without LD flaps and infection was highest in VD-OBCS studies. Inconsistencies in methodology (cosmetic outcome measures, outcome definitions, and time horizons) were found in all procedural groups.

CONCLUSION

Differences in outcomes for both OBCS procedures may be due to the heterogeneity of patient populations. "Doers" and "Users" of breast oncoplastic research should consider tumor size, laterality of tumor, breast size, measurement scales, and defensible time horizons before the application of a study's conclusions.

Systematic review of partial breast reconstruction with pedicled perforator artery flaps: Clinical, oncological and cosmetic outcomes

The use of chest wall perforator flaps (CWPFs) following breast conservation surgery for breast cancer has become a useful tool in the armamentarium of the oncoplastic breast surgeon, however robust evidence for the technique is lacking. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review appraising the current evidence for the use of CWPFs, evaluating clinical, oncological and cosmetic outcomes. A PRISMA-compliant systematic review, with PROSPERO published protocol a priori and search of all relevant database and trial registries between 1990 to July 2020. Eleven studies amounting to 432 cases were reviewed and considered to be at high risk of bias due to small sample size, selective outcome reporting and selection bias. Heterogeneity due to lack of consensus of outcome measures prevented meaningful analysis. Fifty-two (12.3%) clinical complications were recorded: seroma (n = 9; 2.1%), fat necrosis (n = 9; 2.4%), haematoma (n = 8; 1.9%), infection (n = 9; 2.1%), and flap necrosis (n = 9; 2.1%). Thirty-four (10.8%) patients had an involved positive margin, 29 patients underwent re-excision (9.3%) and four underwent completion mastectomy (1.3%). One local recurrence and six distant recurrences were observed during a mean follow up of 21 months (1-49). A pooled patient cosmetic satisfaction descriptor of good or excellent was described in 93% of cases. CWPFs are a safe method of partial breast reconstruction following BCS. They are associated with a low complication rate, acceptable short-term oncological outcomes and satisfactory cosmetic outcome. There is a relative paucity in quality of data in this field and larger prospective studies are needed to investigate outcomes further.

Breast Reconstruction Using the Lateral Thoracic, Thoracodorsal, and Intercostal Arteries Perforator Flaps

Breast-conserving surgery followed by radiotherapy represents the standard of care for early-stage breast cancer. The aim of this article was to provide a review of the literature about the use of the lateral thoracic artery perforator (LTAP) flap, the lateral thoracodorsal (LTD) flap, and the lateral intercostal artery perforator (LICAP) flap in lateral partial breast defect.

Surgical treatment of pressure ulcer: various flaps and other surgical methods

Pressure ulcers remain a common health problem, particularly among physically limited or bedridden older adults, and they can cause significant morbidity and mortality. Conservative management is ineffective for stage III or IV pressure ulcers, and surgery to create flap coverage becomes inevitable. Basic surgical principles for the treatment of pressure ulcers include complete excision of the ulcer, surrounding scar, underlying bursa, and soft tissue calcification; radical removal of underlying bone and any heterotropic ossification; padding of bone stumps and filling dead space; resurfacing with large regional pedicled flaps; and grafting the donor site of the flap, if necessary. For effective edge resection, all the flaps should be designed to be as large as possible, placing the suture line away from the area of direct pressure, and the flap design should also not violate adjacent flap territories to preserve all options for coverage if a breakdown or recurrence dictates further reconstruction. There are surgical methods for stage III or IV wide range pressure ulcers: reconstruction surgery using a skin flap, muscle flap, fascia-skin flap, or free flap. The skin graft is not generally recommended as a surgical procedure for stage III or IV pressure ulcers because it cannot provide enough strength to cover the wound. This review presents various surgical treatments of pressure ulcers including muscle, musculocutaneous, perforator-based, and free flap.

Six-year experience of oncoplastic volume replacement using local perforator flaps

Local perforator flaps may be utilised to correct volume defects after breast-conserving surgery (BCS), improving the cosmetic outcome and avoiding the need for contralateral symmetrising surgery. The aims of this study were to assess longer term oncological outcomes following local perforator flap reconstruction, and to demonstrate the learning curve associated with incorporating such techniques within routine clinical practice. We report a consecutive case series of 116 local perforator flaps performed between January 2014 and May 2020. Data collected included patient demographics, tumour characteristics, surgical procedure data, complications and follow-up outcomes. All breast cancer patients are followed with annual mammographic surveillance for a minimum of five years. Of 116 procedures, 101 were performed as immediate partial breast reconstruction and 15 as delayed reconstructive procedures for patients who had prior breast surgery. The overall complication rate was 15%; the majority were minor surgical site infections, 1.7% required haematoma evacuation. At a median follow-up of 37 months, there were no local cancer recurrences. Three patients who underwent delayed reconstruction required revision procedures, and one required a contralateral symmetrisation procedure. One patient in the immediate reconstruction group required additional lipofilling. Over time, the mean lesion size selected for immediate local flap reconstruction increased, operative times decreased and the proportion of day case procedures increased. Our data confirm that local perforator flaps are associated with low morbidity, excellent oncological outcomes and long-term durability. The use of local flaps can increase the range of indications for BCS, reducing mastectomy rates and the associated revision and symmetrising procedures associated with them.