Closure of meningomyelocele defects using various types of keystone-design perforator island flaps

Long-term follow-up of keystone perforator island flap in reconstructed myelomeningocele defects

Myelomeningocele (a type of spina bifida) is the most common congenital condition that causes lifelong physical disability and requires multi-system surgical procedures. Therefore, it is paramount to reconstruct them using a stable and robust method that heals with minimal wound issues and produces maximum durability. We published a case series on reconstruction of myelomeningocele defects using keystone perforator island flap in the Annals of Plastic Surgery in 2016.1 We aim to report the results of long-term follow-up of 14 years on our case series, where we assessed their scars using POSAS 3.0. We also assessed their quality of life using the QUALAS tool for teenagers. While there are multiple reconstructive options for the closure of myelomeningocele defects, we believe that the keystone perforator island flap technique is reliable and safe as it utilizes the en bloc movement of a large flap of well-vascularized skin, cutis, and muscular fascia to close large defects in the lumbar-sacral regions in newborns, resulting in stable scars.2-7.

Combining a Bilateral Bipedicle Flap and Artificial Dermis for Extensive Coverage in Meningomyelocele Surgery

Myelomeningoceles with soft tissue defects are often difficult to close primarily and require reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, cases with large skin defects or cases with kyphosis of the spine require a large area to be covered, making reconstruction even more difficult. We performed closure of soft tissue defects using a bilateral bipedicle flap and application of artificial dermis to the flap donor area in three cases in which surgery was difficult. The bilateral bipedicle flap was able to easily and reliably close the soft tissue defect even in highly difficult emergency myelomeningocele surgery. We believe that applying artificial dermis to the flap donor area is a useful method that avoids autologous skin grafting and facilitates wound management. There have been no cases of major donor wound contracture. The healing period of the flap donor area may be predicted to some extent by the width immediately after surgery.

Myelomeningocele Defects Reconstruction With Various Types of keystone Flaps: An Algorithmic Approach Based on Defect Shape

The keystone flap has become an established option that has been utilized recently to close significant myelomeningocele defects. Although the keystone flaps can be adapted to repair myelomeningocele defects of different sizes, the shape of the defect is also an essential factor to consider. In this study, the authors proposed an algorithmic approach for reconstructing significant meningomyelocele defects utilizing different types of keystone flaps based on the shape of the resulting defect. From September 2016 to March 2022, the authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 28 patients with meningomyelocele who underwent repair with the keystone flaps. The mean age was 28 days (3 days to 4.5 months). Twenty-one meningomyelocele defects were in the lumbosacral (75%) and 7 in the thoracolumbar regions (25%). The defect sizes ranged from 3.5×5 cm (area, 13.4 cm2) to 9×7 cm (area, 49.5 cm2), with an average of 26.2 cm2. Ten meningomyelocele defects were a vertically oriented oval shape, 16 defects were a transversely oriented oval shape, and 2 defects were circular. In addition, unilateral keystone flap was used in 7.1% of the patients (2 patients), bilateral keystone flap in 28.6% (8 patients), and rotation advancement keystone flaps in 64.3% (18 patients). According to these findings, an algorithm was created based on the defect shape. This algorithmic approach is used as a decision-making guide to select the correct type of keystone flaps to repair myelomeningocele according to the defect shape.

Meningomyelocele Reconstruction: Comparison of Repair Methods via Systematic Review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article was to appraise the various methods of reconstruction for meningomyelocele (MMC) defects.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed to evaluate all reconstructions for MMC. The method of reconstruction was categorized by: primary closure with and without fascial flaps, random pattern flaps, VY advancement flaps (VY), perforator flaps, and myocutaneous flaps. Perforator flaps were subsequently subcategorized based on the type of flap.

RESULTS

Upon systematic review, 567 articles were screened with 104 articles assessed for eligibility. Twenty-nine articles were further reviewed and included for qualitative synthesis. Two hundred seventy patients underwent MMC repair. The lowest rates of major wound complications (MWC) were associated with myocutaneous and random pattern flaps. A majority of MWC was in the lumbrosacral/sacral region (87.5% of MWC). In this region, random patterns and perforator flaps demonstrated the lowest rate of MWC (4.5, 8.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Plastic surgery consultation should be strongly considered for MMC with defects in the lumbosacral/sacral region. Perforator flaps are excellent options for the reconstruction of these defects.

Closure of Giant Dorsal Lumbosacral Myelomeningocele in Children Using Double Expanded Flaps: A Case Report and Literature Review

INTRODUCTION

Myelomeningocele (MMC) is the most common neural tube defect that can occur due to neural tube's failure to fuse properly during embryonic life. To prevent this, expanded flaps can be used for closure of large MMCs.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 4-year and 6-month girl was diagnosed with multiple congenital anomalies including hydrocephalus, dorsal lumbosacral MMC, and congenital tethered cord syndrome. Preoperative evaluation showed no lower limb movements and the size of the sacrococcygeal region was about 10 cm × 8 cm × 15 cm mass, prominent thoracic kyphosis, and no obvious urogenital or limb anomalies. The large dorsal lumbosacral MMC was treated with a double expanded flap to reconstruct, the soft tissue defect following the neurosurgical reconstruction.

DISCUSSION

The expanded flap was deemed as viable as all wounds were healed without any complications, such as dehiscence, leakage of cerebrospinal fluid, or infection. The technique described in the case report offers an effective method of closure.

CONCLUSION

This flap can be an effective method for reconstruction of large dorsal lumbosacral MMC defects that might improve outcomes and minimize complications. It also ensures minimal wound tension and breakdown.

A New Dissection Ladder Approach for Perforator Vessels in Infant Meningomyelocele Soft Tissue Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Meningomyelocele reconstruction is a lifesaving procedure. A freestyle propeller perforator flap is an ideal option for moderate to large soft tissue meningomyelocele reconstruction. Previous studies that focused on the reliability of perforator flaps for meningomyelocele reconstruction recommended preserving a cuff of soft tissue around the perforators to avoid vasospasm. This method is a very conservative approach in comparison to the recently well-established principles of pedicled perforator flap dissection. In this study, we used a dissection ladder approach. In this method, the pedicle is freed by just islanding the pedicle, skeletonization of the perforator, or further dissection of the perforators beyond the muscles, based on intraoperatively monitoring of the flap.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-six infants with a mean age of 2.1 ± 1.1 months underwent surgery for dorsolumbar meningomyelocele at Assuit University Hospital for 3 years. During surgery, the freestyle perforator flap followed a dissection ladder for perforating vessels and intraoperative flap monitoring. Flap viability, seroma, hematoma, and cerebrospinal fluid leakage were evaluated.

RESULTS

Nine cases required perforator skeletonization, 4 cases required dissection beyond the muscle, and 23 cases required islanding the flap on the perforators. The average operative time was 43.37 ± 7.87 minutes. Partial tip ischemia was detected in 2 cases. These cases exhibited partial dehiscence and healed by secondary intention. Complete flap loss did not occur in any cases.

CONCLUSIONS

A conservative approach for perforator flap elevation in infants did not provide optimal results in all cases of thoracolumbar meningomyelocele reconstructions. Well-established principles of perforator dissection, including skeletonization and dissection beyond the muscle, are safe, prevent vasospasms, and improve flap viability.