Relation of resistive and pulsatility indices with graft function after renal transplant

Determinants of the serial changes in measurements of renal allograft Doppler resistive index in the first postoperative month

Introduction:

The role of single Doppler-derived renal resistive index (RI) in renal allograft management is still a controversial issue, however detection of changes in serial duplex scanning has been reported as more valuable. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that early change in RI following transplantation may be related to factors associated with delayed graft function (DGF).

Material and methods:

113 patients were included, in whom two RI measurements were performed within 30 days post-transplant. According to an RI change (equal to or more than 10%) in the second measurement, patients were assigned to decrease (Group I), no change (Group II), or increase (Group III) group.

Results:

30 subjects had a decrease, 55 had no change, and 28 had an increase in the second RI measurement. The donors were younger in Group III in comparison to Group II. In comparison to Group I, Group III had a higher frequency of deceased donor, DGF, and presence of tubular necrosis and tubular vacuolization in peri-implantation biopsies.

Conclusion:

the increase of RI during the first weeks of the postoperative period seems to be associated with DGF and with tubular necrosis / tubular vacuolization in peri-implantation biopsies, likely related to ischemia reperfusion injury.

The predictive value of resistive index obtained by Doppler ultrasonography early after renal transplantation on long-term allograft function

DUSG is a useful diagnostic tool for the follow-up of renal transplant recipients. The measurement of intrarenal arterial RI by DUSG has been proven to predict short-term AF. The aim of the study was to evaluate the predictive value of DUSG performed during the early after RTx on long-term AF. Seventy patients were enrolled into study. DUSG was performed at third and seventh days after RTx. Patients were divided into two groups according to rate of recovery of graft function as patients with normal graft function and abnormal graft function. Although the RI values were correlated with the AF early after transplantation, they were not correlated with long-term AF. However, the rate of recovery of graft function at early period after RTx was correlated with creatinine level at first year and with glomerular filtration rate at first year and last visit. Although the RI has no predictive value for long-term AF, the rate of recovery of graft function at early post-transplantation period has predictive value for long-term AF; patients with higher RI values early after RTx should be followed carefully for the development of chronic allograft injury.