Ureteric Stenting in Kidney Transplants

Are All Stent Bearers Equal? Ureteral Stent Symptoms in Kidney Transplant Patients: A Case-Control Prospective Study

Purpose: The aim of this study is to conduct a prospective, controlled single-center study to determine the prevalence and types of ureteral stent symptoms in kidney transplant (KTx) recipients and compare them with nontransplant subjects. Materials and Methods: From December 2012 to June 2019, a total of 102 patients having undergone a KTx and Double-J stent (DJS) placement and 88 patients having undergone endourological lithotripsy and DJS placement were enrolled. The Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) was administered to patients with a median of 25 (KTx) and 31 (urolithiasis) days after stent placement. USSQ scores were used to compare symptoms between the two groups. Results: Of the 190 patients enrolled, 88 belonged to the lithotripsy group (control group) and 102 to the KTx recipients' group. Mean score for urinary symptoms was 21.42 for KTx patients vs 27.53 for control patients with statistical significance (p < 0.001, CI -7.792 to -4.433). The visual analog scale, overall bother, pain at voiding, flank pain at voiding, and frequency of painkiller use scores were significantly higher for control patients than for KTx patients (p = 0.024, <0.001, <0.001, <0.001, and 0.014, respectively). Frequency of rest, changes in work duration, work domain score, suspicion of urinary tract infection (UTI), and need for professional assistance scores were significantly lower for KTx patients than the control. There were no significant differences in general health and sexual domains between groups. Conclusions: KTx recipients have significantly fewer urinary symptoms, pain, work-related disturbances, suspected UTIs, and hospitalizations associated with stent placement than urolithiasis patients.

Association of Double-J Stenting in Renal Transplant Patients With Urinary Tract Colonization and Infections in a Multidrug-resistant Microbe Endemic Nosocomial Environment

PURPOSE

We investigated the association of ureteral stenting after kidney transplantation with the development of urinary tract infections (UTIs) and/or urinary tract colonization, in a hospital environment considered endemic for multidrug resistant (MDR) Gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae.

METHODS

Seventy-five recipients of deceased donor grafts were divided in groups A and B. Group A (with subgroups A1 and A2) included 45 transplanted patients without urinary stenting, and group B 30 patients with stenting. Subgroup A1 consisted of 30 patients transplanted before 2006, and A2 of 15 patients transplanted after 2006, when MDR, mainly carbapenem-resistant, Enterobacteriaceae, frequency has risen in our hospital.

RESULTS

The incidence and the number of UTIs per patient were significantly higher in patients without stenting compared to those with stenting. (Group A: 32/45 vs group B: 9/30, P < .001, and group A: 2.86 ± 0.43 vs group B: 0.6 ± 0.19, P < .01 respectively). Patients without stenting tended to have a higher frequency of recurrent UTIs compared to those with stenting (group A: 16/45 vs group B: 4/30, P < .05). Asymptomatic bacteriuria was more frequent in the patients with stent (group A: 8/45 vs group B: 14/30, P < .05). Further sub-comparison of the A1 and A2 subgroups with group B did not change the statistical results.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no clinically significant association of ureteral stenting after kidney transplantation with the high frequency of MDR Gram-negative bacteria in our hospital.

The first use of Resonance(®) metallic ureteric stent in a case of obstructed transplant kidney

INTRODUCTION

To date, double JJ stent is the mainstay ureteric stent used in a transplant kidney. We herein report the first use of Resonance(®) metallic ureteric stent to manage ureteric obstruction in a transplant kidney.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 45-year-old lady underwent an uneventful living related donor renal transplantation. Due to post-operative pelvi-ureteric obstruction and recurrent obstruction following multiple distal stent migration and expulsion necessitated frequent nephrostomy insertion and antegrade stenting, she underwent challenging but successful retrograde insertion of a 12 centimetres long and size 6.0 French Cook Resonance(®) metallic ureteric stent which was performed under general anaesthesia.

DISCUSSION

Metallic ureteric stents are a fairly recent introduction to modern urology and they have been successfully used in the management of benign and malignant obstruction of ureter.

CONCLUSION

This is the first case of therapeutic metallic ureteric stent insertion in a transplant kidney.