1
|
Terrec F, Jouve T, Malvezzi P, Janbon B, Naciri Bennani H, Rostaing L, Noble J. Belatacept Use after Kidney Transplantation and Its Effects on Risk of Infection and COVID-19 Vaccine Response. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10215159. [PMID: 34768680 PMCID: PMC8585113 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10215159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Belatacept is a common immunosuppressive therapy used after kidney transplantation (KT) to avoid calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI) use and its related toxicities. It is unclear whether its use exposes KT recipients (KTx) to a greater risk of infection or a poorer response to vaccines. Areas covered: We reviewed PubMed and the Cochrane database. We then summarized the mechanisms and impacts of belatacept use on the risk of infection, particularly opportunistic, in two settings, i.e., de novo KTx and conversion from CNIs. We also focused on COVID-19 infection risk and response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients whose maintenance immunosuppression relies on belatacept. Expert opinion: When belatacept is used de novo, or after drug conversion the safety profile regarding the risk of infection remains good. However, there is an increased risk of opportunistic infections, mainly CMV disease and Pneumocystis pneumonia, particularly in those with a low eGFR, in older people, in those receiving steroid-based therapy, or those that have an early conversion from CNI to belatacept (i.e., <six months post-transplantation). Thus, we recommend, if possible, delaying conversion from CNI to belatacept until at least six months post-transplantation. Optimal timing seems to be eight months post-transplantation. In addition, KTx receiving belatacept respond poorly to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Terrec
- Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphérèses et Transplantation Rénale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes (CHU), Université Grenoble Alpes, 38043 Grenoble, France; (F.T.); (T.J.); (P.M.); (B.J.); (H.N.B.); (J.N.)
| | - Thomas Jouve
- Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphérèses et Transplantation Rénale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes (CHU), Université Grenoble Alpes, 38043 Grenoble, France; (F.T.); (T.J.); (P.M.); (B.J.); (H.N.B.); (J.N.)
- School of Medicine, Université Grenoble Alpes, 38043 Grenoble, France
| | - Paolo Malvezzi
- Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphérèses et Transplantation Rénale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes (CHU), Université Grenoble Alpes, 38043 Grenoble, France; (F.T.); (T.J.); (P.M.); (B.J.); (H.N.B.); (J.N.)
| | - Bénédicte Janbon
- Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphérèses et Transplantation Rénale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes (CHU), Université Grenoble Alpes, 38043 Grenoble, France; (F.T.); (T.J.); (P.M.); (B.J.); (H.N.B.); (J.N.)
| | - Hamza Naciri Bennani
- Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphérèses et Transplantation Rénale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes (CHU), Université Grenoble Alpes, 38043 Grenoble, France; (F.T.); (T.J.); (P.M.); (B.J.); (H.N.B.); (J.N.)
| | - Lionel Rostaing
- Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphérèses et Transplantation Rénale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes (CHU), Université Grenoble Alpes, 38043 Grenoble, France; (F.T.); (T.J.); (P.M.); (B.J.); (H.N.B.); (J.N.)
- School of Medicine, Université Grenoble Alpes, 38043 Grenoble, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-4-76-76-54-60
| | - Johan Noble
- Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphérèses et Transplantation Rénale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes (CHU), Université Grenoble Alpes, 38043 Grenoble, France; (F.T.); (T.J.); (P.M.); (B.J.); (H.N.B.); (J.N.)
- School of Medicine, Université Grenoble Alpes, 38043 Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vigil D, Konstantinov NK, Barry M, Harford AM, Servilla KS, Kim YH, Sun Y, Ganta K, Tzamaloukas AH. BK nephropathy in the native kidneys of patients with organ transplants: Clinical spectrum of BK infection. World J Transplant 2016; 6:472-504. [PMID: 27683628 PMCID: PMC5036119 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i3.472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2016] [Revised: 08/25/2016] [Accepted: 09/08/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Nephropathy secondary to BK virus, a member of the Papoviridae family of viruses, has been recognized for some time as an important cause of allograft dysfunction in renal transplant recipients. In recent times, BK nephropathy (BKN) of the native kidneys has being increasingly recognized as a cause of chronic kidney disease in patients with solid organ transplants, bone marrow transplants and in patients with other clinical entities associated with immunosuppression. In such patients renal dysfunction is often attributed to other factors including nephrotoxicity of medications used to prevent rejection of the transplanted organs. Renal biopsy is required for the diagnosis of BKN. Quantitation of the BK viral load in blood and urine are surrogate diagnostic methods. The treatment of BKN is based on reduction of the immunosuppressive medications. Several compounds have shown antiviral activity, but have not consistently shown to have beneficial effects in BKN. In addition to BKN, BK viral infection can cause severe urinary bladder cystitis, ureteritis and urinary tract obstruction as well as manifestations in other organ systems including the central nervous system, the respiratory system, the gastrointestinal system and the hematopoietic system. BK viral infection has also been implicated in tumorigenesis. The spectrum of clinical manifestations from BK infection and infection from other members of the Papoviridae family is widening. Prevention and treatment of BK infection and infections from other Papovaviruses are subjects of intense research.
Collapse
|
3
|
Successful Treatment of Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis after Kidney Transplantation with Plasma Exchange and Abatacept in a Patient with Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis. Case Rep Transplant 2016; 2016:7137584. [PMID: 27088031 PMCID: PMC4818792 DOI: 10.1155/2016/7137584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2016] [Revised: 03/01/2016] [Accepted: 03/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) after renal transplantation is difficult to treat. Recently a series of four patients unresponsive to plasma exchange (PE) and rituximab, who were successfully treated with abatacept, has been reported. We present a 26-year-old Caucasian patient who suffered from juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and developed severe proteinuria eleven days after transplantation. An allograft biopsy was suggestive of recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. He did not respond to PE therapy. A first dose of abatacept produced partial remission. Four weeks later proteinuria again increased and a second biopsy showed progression of disease. After another ineffective course of PE he was given a second dose of abatacept, which was followed by rapid, complete, and sustained resolution of proteinuria. This treatment caused a significant increase in BK and JC viremia. Whether abatacept ameliorated proteinuria via an effect on podocytes or on the patient's primary disease remains speculative.
Collapse
|