Not All Piggybacks Are Equal: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Variation in Anhepatic Transcaval Pressure Gradient and Acute Kidney Injury During Liver Transplant

Which cava anastomotic techniques are optimal regarding immediate and short-term outcomes after liver transplantation: A systematic review of the literature and expert panel recommendations

BACKGROUND

It has long been debated whether cava anastomosis should be performed with the piggyback technique or cava replacement, with or without veno-venous bypass (VVB), with or without temporary portocaval shunt (PCS) in the setting of liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVES

To identify whether different cava anastomotic techniques and other maneuvers benefit the recipient regarding short-term outcomes and to provide international expert panel recommendations.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central.

METHODS

A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel (CRD42021240979).

RESULTS

Of 3205 records screened, 307 publications underwent full-text assessment for eligibility and 47 were included in qualitative synthesis. Four studies were randomized control trials. Eighteen studies were comparative. The remaining 25 were single-center retrospective noncomparative studies.

CONCLUSION

Based on existing data and expert opinion, the panel cannot recommend one cava reconstruction technique over another, rather the surgical approach should be based on surgeon preference and center dependent, with special consideration toward patient circumstances (Quality of evidence: Low | Grade of Recommendation: Strong). The panel recommends against routine use of vevo-venous bypass (Quality of evidence: Very Low | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) and against the routine use of temporary porto-caval shunt (Quality of evidence: Very Low | Grade of Recommendation: Strong).

Prospective Cohort Study Assessing the Use of Peripheral Saphenous Venous Pressure Monitoring as a Marker of the Transcaval Venous Pressure Gradient in Liver Transplant Surgery

OBJECTIVES

Assessment of the transcaval venous pressure gradient, the central venous to inferior vena caval pressure, assists anesthetists and surgeons in management of liver transplant recipients. Traditionally, this entails insertion of a femoral central line with increased patient risk and health care cost. Here, we assessed the ability of a saphenous vein cannula to act as a surrogate for the femoral central line as a means to assess the transcaval pressure gradient in a safer and less invasive manner.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective cohort of 22 patients undergoing liver transplant underwent saphenous vein cannulation in addition to insertion of a femoral and internal jugular central venous catheter. Data were collected throughout each phase of surgery to assess the central, femoral, and saphenous vein pressures; results of a range of relevant physiological and ventilatory data were also collected.

RESULTS

The primary outcome, the correlation between saphenous and femoral venous pressure throughout surgery, was acceptable (r2 = 0.491, P < .001). During the anhepatic phase of surgery, this correlation improved (r2 = 0.912, P < .001). The correlation between the femoral to central venous pressure and saphenous to central venous pressure gradients was also reasonable throughout surgery (r2 = 0.386, P < .001), and this correlation was significantly stronger during the anhepatic phase (r2 = 0.935, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Saphenous venous pressure, provided by peripheral cannulation, provided a reliable, less invasive, and safer alternative to femoral central line insertion for determination of the transcaval pressure gradient during the anhepatic phase of liver transplant.