Synthetic Graft for Reconstruction of Middle Hepatic Vein Tributaries in Living-Donor Liver Transplant

Successful use of venous graft from native liver with hepatocellular carcinoma during living donor liver transplantation with no impact on recurrence rate: A retrospective cohort study

Introduction

There are still debates regarding using portal vein (PV) from liver with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for vascular reconstruction. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and patency of PV venous graft from an explanted liver with HCC for the reconstruction of the hepatic veins tributaries or PV in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and to see if it has any risk on recurrence of HCC.

Patient and methods

We conducted a retrospective study on 81 patients with HCC who underwent LDLT from April 2004 to July 2022.

Results

Venous graft from native liver PV was used for vascular reconstruction in 31 patients as follows; reconstruction of V5 in 7 patients, V8 in 4 patients, V6 in 3 patients, combined V5 and V8 in 4 patients, V6 with V5/V8 in 5 patients, and as Y shape venous graft for 2 PV reconstruction in 8 patients. The implantation of the new conduit PV graft after reconstruction of the anterior sector tributaries was direct to the IVC in 8 patients, and to the common orifice of the left and middle hepatic veins in 12 patients. The 1 month, 3 months, and 1-year overall patency of the venous graft was 93.5%, 90.3%, and 84%, respectively. Nine patients had recurrent HCC. In multivariate analysis, the independent risk factors for HCC recurrence were AFP >400 ng/mL (HR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.69–2.31, P = 0.01), moderate/poor differentiated tumor (HR = 3.06, 95% CI: 2.58–6.29, P = 0.02), and microvascular invasion (HR = 2.51, 95% CI: 1.05–1.93, P = 0.01). Using a PV venous graft had no risk factor for HCC recurrence (P = 0.9).

Conclusion

The use of PV venous graft of native liver with HCC for venous reconstruction is a feasible and valuable option in LDLT with good patency rates and no risk of HCC recurrence.

•

The use of PV venous graft of native liver with HCC for venous reconstruction is a feasible and valuable option in LDLT.

•

It has good patency rates and no risk on HCC recurrence.

•

The independent risk factors for HCC recurrence in our study were AFP >400 ng/mL, moderate/poor differentiated tumor, and microvascular invasion.

Venous outflow reconstruction using a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft in right lobe living donor liver transplantation: A single center study

BACKGROUND

Venous outflow reconstruction is very important especially in right lobe living donor liver transplantation without middle hepatic vein. Various interposition (venous or synthetic) grafts have been recommended for reconstruction of anterior sector tributaries.

METHODS

We aimed to describe our surgical technique and analyze anterior sector venous reconstruction using expanded polytetrafluroethylene graft. Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for 760 primary right lobe living donor liver transplantations performed at our institute between December 2011 and June 2018. Reconstruction of anterior sector: expanded polytetrafluroethylene (group A, n = 705) and autologous vein (group B, n = 55).

RESULTS

Pretransplant characteristics were comparable among both groups. Group A has significantly lower cold ischemia time (68.7 ± .3.5 minutes vs 127.8 ± 7.2 minutes; P < .001) and anhepatic time (116.3 ± 5.5 minutes vs 190.81 ± 9.35 minutes; P < .001) compared with group B. There was no difference in recovery pattern of liver functions, morbidity, and mortality between the 2 groups. One- and 6-month patency rates of interposition grafts were 97.6% and 84.4% (group A) and 96.4% and 78.1% (group B), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In centers with limited access to homologous or autologous vascular grafts, use of expanded polytetrafluroethylene graft for anterior sector venous outflow reconstruction in right lobe living donor liver transplantation is a viable option with excellent patency and patient outcomes.

Comparison of Patients With and Without Anterior Sector Venous Drainage in Right Lobe Liver Transplantation From Live Donors in Terms of Complications, Rejections, and Graft Survival: Single-Center Experience

AIM

The issue of performing an anastomosis of the anterior sector veins to the vena cava in living donor liver transplantation is still controversial. We aimed to research whether there was any difference in terms of complications, rejections, and graft survival between patients with and without anterior sector venous drainage to the vena cava.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were retrospectively investigated for demographic data and ratio of graft needed to available graft weight. Donors had volumetric calculations and middle hepatic vein anterior sector drainage documented in detail.

RESULTS

Seventy-three donors with middle hepatic vein drainage were included. Thirty-five had anterior sector venous drainage performed and 38 patients did not have drainage procedures performed. The incidence of general complications was higher in the group without anterior sector drainage (78.3% and P = .002). Biloma linked to bile leaks were observed in 8 patients without drainage (72.8%) and 3 patients with drainage (27.2%). Late acute rejection occurring during follow up after transplantation was identified in 28 patients (11.6%). Of these, 1 (14.3%) had anterior sector drainage and 6 (85.7%) were in the patient group without drainage (P = .067).

CONCLUSION

As a result of this study, for patients with grafts at the volume limit (graft weight to receiver weight ratio <0.8) and with congestion observed in the anterior sector after liver implantation and for patients with outflow problems identified on Doppler ultrasonography, anterior sector veins >5 mm should definitely be drained into the vena cava. Hence, both complication and rejection rates will reduce, and we can lengthen the graft, and thus patient, survival.

Explant portal vein for reconstructing middle hepatic vein in right lobe living donor liver transplantation-outcome analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to study the four week patency rates of the reconstructed neo middle hepatic vein specifically using the explant portal vein (PV) in right hemiliver live donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We hypothesized that short term patency of the neo-MHV should result in good graft and patient outcomes.

METHODS

Pre, intra and post operative variables were prospectively collected for 88 consecutive patients undergoing right hemiliver LDLT from January 2014 to October 2015.

RESULTS

Explant PV was used to reconstruct neo-MHV in 76 (86.4%, 76/88) patients. Neo MHV patency rate at 28 days with explant PV was 89.4% (59/66) and with other conduit (PTFE) was 90.9% (10/11). All occlusions were detected after 7 days. There was no impact of the patency of the neo-MHV on the incidence of early allograft dysfunction, sepsis, rejection, morbidity or mortality, despite the contribution of the anterior sector to the graft volume being more than 50% in close to two-thirds of patients.

CONCLUSION

The reconstructed neo-MHV has excellent short term patency rates at 4 weeks. Perhaps due to the absence of early occlusions, there was no impact on graft or patient outcomes in the study population.

Risk factors and survival outcomes of biliary complications after adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation

The objective of this study was to evaluate the risk factors and survival outcomes of biliary complications (BCs) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) based on our single-center experience. From 2007 to 2010, 112 adult patients were assessed. Forty-nine patients (43.8%) experienced at least one episode of BCs, including biliary stricture and bile leak, occurring in 37.5% and 16.1% of the patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that hepatic artery thrombosis (relative risk (RR), 5.692; 95% CI, 2.132 to 15.201; p < 0.001), a hepatic duct diameter of less than 3 mm (RR, 2.523; 95% CI, 1.295 to 4.914; p = 0.005), ductoplasty (RR, 2.175; 95% CI, 1.134 to 4.174; p = 0.018), and cytomegalovirus infection (RR, 4.452; 95% CI, 1.868 to 10.613; p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for the development of BCs. However, these factors and BCs showed no prominent impact on the overall survival (OS) and graft survival (GS). In addition, the patients who developed vascular complications demonstrated poor outcomes in terms of OS (five-year, 56.3% vs. 78.1%; p = 0.017), GS (five-year, 56.3% vs. 77.1%; p = 0.023), and BC-free survival (five-year, 25.0% vs. 63.5%; p = 0.007) compared with patients without vascular complications. In conclusion, BCs remain a common problem after LDLT, especially for patients using duct-to-duct anastomosis. Hepatic artery thrombosis, a short duct diameter, ductoplasty, and cytomegalovirus infection lead to an increased incidence of BCs. The occurrence of BCs manifested no significant influence on the long-term survival outcomes. However, our findings await verification through large-scale randomized studies regarding the risk factors for the development of BCs and their impact on the prognosis.

Surgical outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma invading hepatocaval confluence

BACKGROUND

Combined liver and inferior vena cava (IVC) resection followed by IVC and/or hepatic vein reconstruction (HVR) is a curative operation for selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) invading the hepatocaval confluence. The present study aimed to elucidate the prognostic factors for patients with HCC invading the hepatocaval confluence.

METHODS

Forty-two consecutive patients underwent hepatectomy, combined with IVC replacement and/or HVR for HCC between January 2009 and December 2014 were included in this study. The cases were divided into three groups based on the surgical approaches of HVR: group 1 (n=13), tumor invaded the hepatocaval confluence but with one or two hepatic veins intact in the residual liver, thus only the replacement of IVC, not HVR; group 2 (n=23), the hepatic vein of the residual liver was also partially invaded, and the hepatic vein defect was repaired with patches locally; group 3 (n=6), three hepatic veins at the hepatocaval confluence were infiltrated, and the hepatic vein remnant was re-implanted onto the side of the tube graft. The patient characteristics, intra- and postoperative results, and long-term overall survival were compared among the three groups. The survival-related factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The group 1 had higher preoperative alpha-fetoprotein level (P<0.001), shorter operation time, hepatic ischemic time and hospital stay compared with groups 2 and 3 (P<0.05). The 1-, 3-, and 4-year overall survival rates of group 1 were 84.6%, 23.1% and 23.1%, respectively; group 2 were 78.3%, 8.7% and 8.7% respectively and group 3 were 83.3%, 0 and 0, respectively. The multivariate analysis showed that the independent poor prognostic factors of overall survival were preoperative higher HBV DNA level (≥10³ copies/mL; P=0.001), tumor size (≥9 cm; P<0.0001), age (≥60 years; P=0.010) and underwent HVR (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with reconstructing hepatic vein with patches locally (group 2) or to the artificial graft (group 3) had worse long-term survival than those without HVR (group 1). HVR was one of the unfavorable prognostic factors of overall survival.

Living donor liver transplantation in Egypt

In Egypt there is no doubt that chronic liver diseases are a major health concern. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence among the 15-59 years age group is estimated to be 14.7%. The high prevalence of chronic liver diseases has led to increasing numbers of Egyptian patients suffering from end stage liver disease (ESLD), necessitating liver transplantation (LT). We reviewed the evolution of LT in Egypt and the current status. A single center was chosen as an example to review the survival and mortality rates. To date, deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) has not been implemented in any program though Egyptian Parliament approved the law in 2010. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) seemed to be the only logical choice to save many patients who are in desperate need for LT. By that time, there was increase in number of centers doing LDLT (13 centers) and increase in number of LDLT cases [2,400] with improvement of the results. Donor mortality rate is 1.66 per 1,000 donors; this comprised four donors in the Egyptian series. The exact recipient survival is not accurately known however, and the one-year, three-year and five-year survival were 73.17%, 70.83% and 64.16% respectively in the International Medical Center (IMC) in a series of 145 adult to adult living donor liver transplantation (AALDLT) cases. There was no donor mortality in this series. LDLT are now routinely and successfully performed in Egypt with reasonable donor and recipient outcomes. Organ shortage remains the biggest hurdle facing the increasing need for LT. Although LDLT had reasonable outcomes, it carries considerable risks to healthy donors. For example, it lacks cadaveric back up, and is not feasible for all patients. The initial success in LDLT should drive efforts to increase the people awareness about deceased organ donation in Egypt.