1
|
Barrott L, Wiseman T, Tsianakas V, Czuber-Dochan W. Nurse and pharmacist systemic anti-cancer therapy review clinics and their impact on patient experience and care: A systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2023; 79:442-453. [PMID: 36448339 PMCID: PMC10100432 DOI: 10.1111/jan.15512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
AIM To review the evidence of how nurse and pharmacist roles have been incorporated into the management of patients undergoing systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) services and their impact on patient experience and care provision. DESIGN Systematic Review. DATA SOURCES Seven databases were searched on 10 April 2022. REVIEW METHODS Research studies that met defined inclusion criteria were included. Quantitative findings were converted into textual descriptions and combined with qualitative results for thematic analysis. Data were categorized and aggregated into themes. Heterogeneity of studies meant meta-analysis was not possible. RESULTS Fifteen papers were included. Three main themes were identified: advanced clinical practice (ACP) SACT service development; ACP skills and qualifications; and the impact of ACP SACT services on patient care and outcomes. There is a variation in tasks undertaken by nurses and pharmacists and role integration is restricted by limited physician engagement. Role titles used and skills and qualifications acquired differ and professional autonomy is variable. Qualitative studies were limited. CONCLUSION Evidence of how nursing and pharmacist ACP roles are implemented, what skills are essential and how roles are impacting patient experience and outcomes is limited. More research is required to explore patient and physician experience of, and satisfaction with multi-professional care, alongside further evaluation of clinical delivery models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Barrott
- University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK.,Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Theresa Wiseman
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.,The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Vicki Tsianakas
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cheng F, Yuan G, Li Q, Cui Z, Li W. Long-term outcomes of frontline imatinib therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia in China. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1172910. [PMID: 37205184 PMCID: PMC10185871 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1172910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Imatinib is the first-line therapy recommended for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients in China. We reported a long-term follow-up study of patients on imatinib as first-line treatment for chronic phase (CP) CML to provide an important reference for the actual clinical treatment regimen of CML patients in China. Methods We evaluated the long-term efficacy, safety, low-dose attempt after years of treatment, and treatment-free remission (TFR) of 237 CML-CP patients receiving first-line imatinib therapy. Results The median age was 46 years (interquartile range: 33-55). After a median follow-up of 6.5 years, the cumulative complete cytogenetic response, major molecular response (MMR), and MR4.5 rates were 82.6%, 80.4%, and 69.3%, respectively. The 10-year transformation-free, event-free, and failure-free survival rates were 97.3%, 87.2% and 53.5%, respectively. Fifty-two (21.9%) patients with sustained deep molecular response (DMR) were treated with low-dose imatinib after years of imatinib treatment. No significant differences in the 1-year and 2-year molecular relapse-free survival in MMR and MR4 were observed between the standard-dose and low-dose groups. Twenty-eight (11.8%) patients discontinued imatinib, and the median time to maintain DMR before discontinuation was 8.43 years. Thirteen patients (5.5%) remained in TFR for a median of 43.33 months. No patients transformed to accelerate or blast phase or died. No new, late toxicity was observed, and the most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (9.3%), anemia (7.6%), thrombocytopenia (6.3%), and rash (4.2%). Conclusion This study confirmed the long-term efficacy and safety of imatinib for treating Chinese CML patients. Additionally, it demonstrated the feasibility of imatinib dose reduction and TFR attempts in patients with sustained stable DMR after years of imatinib treatment in real-life settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang Cheng
- Department of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Hubei Province Clinical Research Center for Precision Medicine for Critical Illness, Wuhan, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Biological Targeted Therapy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Guolin Yuan
- Department of Hematology, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science, Hubei, China
| | - Qiang Li
- Department of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Hubei Province Clinical Research Center for Precision Medicine for Critical Illness, Wuhan, China
| | - Zheng Cui
- Department of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Hubei Province Clinical Research Center for Precision Medicine for Critical Illness, Wuhan, China
| | - Weiming Li
- Department of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- *Correspondence: Weiming Li,
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Etteldorf A, Rotolo S, Sedhom R, Vogel RI, Blaes A, Dusetzina SB, Virnig B, Gupta A. Finding the Lowest-Cost Pharmacy for Cancer Supportive Care Medications: Not So Easy. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e1342-e1349. [PMID: 35623024 PMCID: PMC9377721 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To decrease the financial burden on people with cancer, clinicians and patients increasingly use medication price comparison websites to seek pharmacies where medications may be cheaper. Shopping around at different pharmacies can add additional time and logistic burden to patients and care partners. We sought to determine whether a single pharmacy consistently offered the lowest price for symptom control medications. METHODS We compiled medications/formulations used to manage two common cancer-associated symptoms: nausea/vomiting and anorexia/cachexia. We extracted discounted, lowest price with coupon prices for a typical fill of these medications at nine pharmacies in Minneapolis, MN, using GoodRx. We compared prices across formulations and pharmacies to assess whether a pharmacy consistently offered the lowest price. RESULTS We included 24 formulations for nausea/vomiting (14 generic and 10 brand-name) and 19 for anorexia/cachexia (12 generic and seven brand-name). Prices for brand-name formulations were similar across pharmacies, but prices of generic formulations varied widely across pharmacies. For example, the prices of a seven-unit fill of generic 5-mg olanzapine tablets ranged from $4 to $57 US dollars. No single pharmacy consistently offered the lowest price across the formulations studied. For example, for the 12 generic formulations for anorexia/cachexia, one pharmacy had the highest price for four formulations and the lowest price for two others. CONCLUSION In this study of discounted medication prices, we found that no single pharmacy in an urban zip code consistently offered the lowest price for medications used to manage two common cancer-associated symptoms. Well-intentioned efforts to pursue the cheapest source of each medication by visiting multiple pharmacies may add extra time and logistic toxicity to patients and care partners. This approach can increase redundant scripts and expose patients to medication-related adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ramy Sedhom
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Anne Blaes
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sivakumaran K, Ginex PK, Waseem H, Belcher SM, Lagler-Clark S, LeFebvre KB, Palmer N, Pasumarthi T, Morgan RL. Domains of Structured Oral Anticancer Medication Programs: A Scoping Review. Oncol Nurs Forum 2022; 49:296-306. [PMID: 35788732 PMCID: PMC9303043 DOI: 10.1188/22.onf.296-306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION An interprofessional approach is necessary to support the multifactorial process of patient adherence to oral anticancer medications (OAMs). This scoping review aims to identify structured OAM programs in published literature, identify components within studies, and propose a framework for institutions developing or maintaining OAM programs. LITERATURE SEARCH Embase®, PubMed®, and CINAHL® databases were searched for studies published between January 2000 and April 2021. DATA EVALUATION Two reviewers screened studies and extracted data. Characteristics and specific domains of the OAM programs were captured. Key components of the programs were identified, and a framework was created to guide program development. SYNTHESIS Components identified among the 21 studies were education; counseling; follow-up; dedicated clinician contact; adverse event and toxicity monitoring; adherence monitoring; drug procurement, delivery, and supply; patient- and system-level cost reduction; information technology; and risk assessment. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH Based on the findings, a framework for building and evaluating OAM adherence programs is proposed. Future studies should evaluate the reliability and validity of this framework because further testing may lead to the development of additional components.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pamela K. Ginex
- School of Nursing, Stony Brook University with a joint appointment in the Division of Population Science at the Stony Brook Cancer Center, both in New York, and was, at the time of writing, the senior manager of evidence-based practice and inquiry at the Oncology Nursing Society in Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Sarah M. Belcher
- School of Nursing and Palliative Research Center at the University of Pittsburgh in Pennsylvania
| | - Sarah Lagler-Clark
- Evidence Foundation and Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Tejanth Pasumarthi
- Evidence Foundation and a student in the School of Interdisciplinary Science at McMaster University
| | - Rebecca L. Morgan
- Evidence Foundation and an assistant professor in the Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact at McMaster University
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Belcher SM, Mackler E, Muluneh B, Ginex PK, Anderson MK, Bettencourt E, DasGupta RK, Elliott J, Hall E, Karlin M, Kostoff D, Marshall VK, Millisor VE, Molnar M, Schneider SM, Tipton J, Yackzan S, LeFebvre KB, Sivakumaran K, Waseem H, Morgan RL. ONS Guidelines™ to Support Patient Adherence to Oral Anticancer Medications. Oncol Nurs Forum 2022; 49:279-295. [PMID: 35788731 PMCID: PMC9303042 DOI: 10.1188/22.onf.279-295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This evidence-based guideline intends to support patients, clinicians, and others regarding interventions and processes to support patient adherence to oral anticancer medications (OAMs). METHODOLOGIC APPROACH A panel of healthcare professionals and patient representatives developed a clinical practice guideline to support patients taking OAMs. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) methodology and criteria for trustworthy guidelines were followed. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. A quantitative or narrative synthesis of the evidence was completed. Certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE. FINDINGS The panel agreed on recommendations and suggested an adherence risk assessment, education addressing adherence, ongoing assessment, proactive follow-up, coaching, and motivational interviewing in addition to usual care. The panel suggested the implementation of a structured OAM program. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING As cancer treatment shifts from clinic to home settings, interventions and programs to support patients on OAMs are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M. Belcher
- School of Nursing and in the Palliative Research Center at the University of Pittsburgh in Pennsylvania
| | - Emily Mackler
- Michigan Institute for Care Management and Transformation and the Michigan Oncology Quality Consortium in Ann Arbor
| | - Benyam Muluneh
- Eshelman School of Pharmacy at the University of North Carolina in Durham
| | - Pamela K. Ginex
- School of Nursing at Stony Brook University with a joint appointment in the Division of Population Science at the Stony Brook Cancer Center, both in New York, and was, at the time of writing, the senior manager of evidence-based practice and inquiry at the Oncology Nursing Society in Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | | | | | | | - Erica Hall
- Oncology Consultants, P.A., in Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | - Maegan Molnar
- Waco Therapy and Holistic Wellness Services in Texas and a cancer policy and advocacy team member at the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship in Silver Spring, MD
| | | | | | - Susan Yackzan
- Cancer Service Line at Baptist Health System in Lexington, KY
| | | | | | | | - Rebecca L. Morgan
- Evidence Foundation and an assistant professor in the Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact at McMaster University
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tan BK, Bee PC, Chua SS, Chen LC. Monitoring and Improving Adherence to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Systematic Review. Patient Prefer Adherence 2021; 15:2563-2575. [PMID: 34819724 PMCID: PMC8608409 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s269355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Suboptimal adherence to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is a widely recognized issue compromising the disease control and survival of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). A recently published review by Heiney et al reported inconclusive findings on the effects of a broad range of adherence enhancing interventions. The current systematic review aimed to identify studies that evaluated adherence-enhancing interventions implemented by healthcare professionals and determine their effect on CML patients' medication adherence and clinical outcomes. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed in 5 databases for articles published between 2002 and 2021. Studies that compared adherence enhancing interventions implemented by healthcare professionals with a comparison group were included. Relevant data on study characteristics were extracted. Medication adherence and clinical outcomes between intervention and control arms were compared. RESULTS Nine studies were included in two randomised controlled trials, four cohort studies, and three before-and-after comparison studies. All the included studies incorporated complex interventions, including intensive education or consultation with pharmacists, nurses or multidisciplinary team, in combination with one or more other strategies such as structured follow-up, written materials or video, psychotherapy, medication reminder or treatment diary, with the overall goal of monitoring and improving TKI adherence. Most (7 out of 9) studies demonstrated significantly better adherence to TKIs in the intervention group than the comparison group. The relative proportion of participants who adhered to TKIs ranged from 1.22 to 2.42. The improvement in the rate of TKI doses taken/received ranged from 1.5% to 7.1%. Only one study showed a significant association between intervention and clinical outcomes, with a 22.6% higher major molecular response rate and improvement in 6 out of 20 subscales of health-related quality-of-life. CONCLUSION Complex interventions delivered by healthcare professionals showed improvement in adherence to TKIs in CML patients. Further studies are required to clarify the cost-effectiveness of adherence-enhancing interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bee Kim Tan
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Taylor’s University, Subang Jaya, Selangor, 47500, Malaysia
- Correspondence: Bee Kim Tan School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Taylor’s University, Subang Jaya, Selangor, 47500, MalaysiaTel +6 03 5629 5000 Email
| | - Ping Chong Bee
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia
| | - Siew Siang Chua
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Taylor’s University, Subang Jaya, Selangor, 47500, Malaysia
| | - Li-Chia Chen
- Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
| |
Collapse
|