Screening Tool Identifies Older Adults With Cancer at Risk for Poor Outcomes

Care Delivery Interventions for Individuals with Cancer: A Literature Review and Focus on Gastrointestinal Malignancies

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal malignancies represent a particularly challenging condition, often requiring a multidisciplinary approach to management in order to meet the unique needs of these individuals and their caregivers.

PURPOSE

In this literature review, we sought to describe care delivery interventions that strive to improve the quality of life and care for patients with a focus on gastrointestinal malignancies.

CONCLUSION

We highlight patient-centered care delivery interventions, including patient-reported outcomes, hospital-at-home interventions, and other models of care for individuals with cancer. By demonstrating the relevance and utility of these different care models for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies, we hope to highlight the importance of developing and testing new interventions to address the unique needs of this population.

The oncological multidimensional prognostic index is a promising decision-making tool: A real-world analysis in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Approximately 50% of colorectal cancers occur in older patients. International societies recommend geriatric tools to optimise treatment of older patients. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is a multidimensional assessment used to classify patients as fit, vulnerable, or frail. The CGA-based oncological multidimensional prognostic index (onco-MPI) also classifies patients as high-, intermediate-, or low-risk based on tumour characteristics. We investigated the role of CGA and onco-MPI in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Data for consecutive mCRC patients aged ≥70 years were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database from 2010 to 2020. We analyzed patients' and tumours' characteristics, and the CGA domains. Onco-MPI was calculated by a validated algorithm derived from CGA domains. Pearson's test was used to verify whether onco-MPI scores and chemotherapy administration were correlated.

RESULTS

The study included 488 mCRC patients with a mean age of 76.1 years. According to CGA, 52% of patients were fit, 28% vulnerable, and 20% frail. According to onco-MPI, 9% were low, 54% intermediate, and 37% high-risk. The median OS was 22.7 months. The following factors improved OS: 0-1 ECOG PS, low onco-MPI, fit based on CGA, chemotherapy administration, and doublet regimen. Chemotherapy administration significantly correlated with onco-MPI scores, leading to a survival gain regardless of the risk subgroups. First-line regimen had no impact on survival across the CGA and onco-MPI categories.

CONCLUSION

CGA and onco-MPI scores confirmed their prognostic impact in older mCRC patients and may aid in decision-making and subgroup stratification in dedicated trials.

The epidemiology of preexisting geriatric and palliative conditions in older adults with poor prognosis cancers

BACKGROUND

Older patients with poor prognosis cancers have complex needs that can benefit from geriatrics and palliative care principles. Because they are not routinely assessed, the prevalence of preexisting geriatric and palliative conditions in this population is unknown.

METHODS

We used the nationally representative Health and Retirement Study (HRS) linked with Medicare claims (1998-2016) to identify adults aged ≥65 years diagnosed with poor prognosis cancers (cancers with a median survival ≤1 year). Using the HRS interview before the first Medicare cancer claim, we used survey-weighted descriptive statistics and modified Poisson regression analysis to examine the prevalence of the following clinically significant conditions: functional impairment, difficulty with mobility, falls and injurious falls, social support, cognition, advance care planning, use of pain or sleep medications, and presence of pain or breathlessness.

RESULTS

Of 2105 participants (mean age 76, 53% women, 34% lung cancer, 21% gastrointestinal cancer), the median survival was 9.6 months. Approximately 65% had difficulty climbing stairs (95% CI 63%-67%), 49% had no advance directive (95% CI 45%-54%), 35% lived alone (95% CI 33%-37%), 36% fell in the last 2 years (95% CI 34%-38%), and 32% rated their memory as poor (95% CI 29%-34%). After adjusting for gender, cancer type, and HRS survey time before the first Medicare claim for a poor prognosis cancer, functional impairment and falls were highest among adults aged 85+. Adults aged 65-74 years were less likely to have an advance directive. After adjusting for age, cancer type, and HRS survey time, women had a higher rate of pain and physical impairment. In exploratory analyses, race and socioeconomic status predicted difficulty with mobility and instrumental activities of daily living, living alone, and advance directive completion.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to a high prevalence across multiple domains, all older adults with poor prognosis cancers should be assessed for geriatric and palliative care conditions.

NAVIGATE: improving survival in vulnerable patients with lung cancer through nurse navigation, symptom monitoring and exercise - study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Low socioeconomic position (SEP) has been shown to be strongly associated with impaired lung cancer survival. Barriers related to receiving recommended treatment among patients with lung cancer with low SEP may include adverse health behaviour and limited physical and psychosocial resources influencing the ability to react on high-risk symptoms and to navigate the healthcare system. To address the underlying factors that drive both decisions of treatment, adherence to treatment and follow-up in vulnerable patients with lung cancer, we developed the Navigate intervention. The aim of this randomised controlled trial is to investigate the effect of the intervention on survival (primary outcome), lung cancer treatment adherence, health-related quality of life and other psychosocial outcomes as well as health costs and process evaluation (secondary outcomes) in a study population of vulnerable patients with lung cancer.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This two-armed multicentre randomised trial will recruit patients from five lung cancer clinics in Denmark identified as vulnerable according to a screening instrument with nine clinical and patient-reported vulnerability criteria developed for the study. We will enrol 518 vulnerable patients >18 years old diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer at all stages with a performance status <2. Participants will be randomly allocated to either standard treatment and intervention or standard treatment alone. The Navigate intervention is based on principles from motivational interviewing and includes three components of nurse navigation, systematic monitoring of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and physical exercise in a person-centred delivery model. Data will be collected at baseline and 3, 6, 12 months after randomisation using questionnaires, clinical data and physical function tests.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics Committee, Region Zealand (SJ-884/EMN-2020-37380) and the Data Protection Agency in Region Zealand (REG-080-2021) approved the trial. Participants will provide written informed consent. Results will be reported in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05053997.

Palliative and Supportive Care for Individuals with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Individuals with pancreatic adenocarcinoma experience a complex constellation of palliative and supportive care needs. Notably, when caring for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, clinicians must carefully assess and address these individuals' palliative and supportive care needs, as these can have important implications related to their treatment experience and care outcomes. Importantly, prior research has consistently demonstrated the benefits of palliative and supportive care interventions for patients with cancer to help address symptom burden, illness understanding, coping mechanisms, and informed decision making. However, much of this research did not specifically tailor the interventions to the unique concerns of a pancreatic cancer population. Thus, an urgent need exists to design and conduct rigorous research with the goal of enhancing care delivery and outcomes for the highly symptomatic population of individuals with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Systematic self-reporting of patients’ symptoms: improving oncologic care and patients’ satisfaction

Background:

In recent years, there has been a growing interest to enhance patients’ symptom management during routine cancer care using patient-reported outcome measures. The goal of this study is to analyse patients’ responses to the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) to determine whether patient-reported outcomes could help characterise those patients with the highest supportive care needs and symptom burden in order to help provide targeted support for patients.

Methods:

In this study, we analysed ESAS questionnaire responses completed by patients as part of their routine care and considered part of patients’ standard of care. Statistical analyses were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics version 26.0. Descriptive statistics are used to summarise patient demographics, disease characteristics and patient-reported symptom severity and prevalence.

Results:

The overall mean age is 65.2 ± 12.8 years comprising 43.8% male and 56.2% female patients. The five common primary disease sites are breast (26.2%), haematology (21.1%), gastrointestinal (15.3%), genitourinary (12.7%) and lung (12.0%) cancers. The mean severity for each symptom is all mild (score: 1–3). The three most common reported symptoms causing distress are tiredness, poor overall wellbeing and anxiety, and the least reported symptom is nausea.

Conclusions:

Systematic self-reporting of patients’ symptoms is important to improve symptom management, timely facilitation of appropriate intervention, patient experience, and patient and family satisfaction. The awareness of disease site, gender and age-related symptom variations should help in the design and provision of appropriate symptom-directed, tumour-specific and patient-focused interventions to meet patients’ immediate needs.

Leveraging patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with pancreatic cancer: The Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (PanCAN) online patient registry experience

Background

The Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (PanCAN) Patient Registry is an online, pancreatic cancer‐specific, global registry enabling patients to self‐report sociodemographics, disease/management characteristics, and patient‐reported outcomes (PROs). We sought to describe the creation, user experience, and research potential of the PanCAN Registry.

Methods

We obtained data to describe (1) the creation of the Registry (questionnaire development, marketing efforts, and regulatory considerations); (2) the user experience (user characteristics and interactions with the registry following inception); and (3) the research potential of the registry (comparing PROs and treatment patterns by age [±65 years] and treatment site [community or academic] for users with de novo metastatic disease).

Results

The Registry was conceived as part of PanCAN’s strategic plan for a personalized therapy initiative. PanCAN staff and disease expert consultants developed questionnaires hosted on an electronic PRO platform. Users had the option to include their data in research efforts, and the Registry platform received institutional review board approval. From 7/2015 to 12/2020, 2187 patients visited the registry and 1697 (77.6%) completed at least one survey (median age = 64 years [range: 24–90], 47.9% women, 88.7% White, 34.0% metastatic disease). Among patients with metastatic disease (N = 567), 46.0% were ≥65 years old and 67.5% received treatment at community sites. Patients ≥65 years reported feeling less hopeful about the treatment plan (12.4% vs. 24.3%, p = 0.003), and patients treated at community sites reported more frequent treatment breaks of >2 weeks (58.2% vs. 28.1%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate the feasibility, usability, and research potential of an online PRO registry for patients with cancer. This description of the PanCAN Registry should inform future registry‐building efforts to facilitate standardized PRO reporting and provide a valuable research database.

Clinicaltrial registration number: Not applicable.

Implicações da avaliação geriátrica ampla na qualidade de vida em pessoas idosas com câncer: uma revisão integrativa

Resumo A avaliação geriátrica ampla (AGA) melhora a qualidade do cuidado das pessoas idosas com câncer, pois permite a identificação de problemas geriátricos e fragilidades que tenham implicações na saúde do indivíduo. Apesar dos benefícios da AGA, dificuldades relacionadas ao tempo e gastos com essa ferramenta limitam sua implantação na prática. O objetivo desta revisão é avaliar a relação entre a AGA e a qualidade de vida (QV) de pessoas idosas com câncer, através de uma revisão integrativa da literatura. Foi realizada uma busca por artigos nas bases de dados PubMed, MEDLINE, IBECS e LILACS, publicados entre 2015 e 2020, que abordassem as implicações da AGA na QV de pessoas idosas com câncer e, dos 298 estudos encontrados, 21 foram selecionados para análise. Esses demonstraram que a AGA desempenha função importante ao identificar pessoas idosas com maior risco de comprometimento da QV durante a evolução da neoplasia e do tratamento oncológico, bem como ao orientar a indicação de intervenções geriátricas específicas que previnam a deterioração da QV. Assim, a presente revisão destaca a importância da avaliação integral das pessoas idosas com câncer que, através de diferentes âmbitos, sejam prognósticos ou intervencionistas, desenvolve um papel fundamental na preservação da QV dessa população. Compreende-se a necessidade de desenvolver estratégias para incorporação da AGA no cuidado das pessoas idosas com câncer.