1
|
Ivanics T, Claasen MPAW, Samstein B, Emond JC, Fox AN, Pomfret E, Pomposelli J, Tabrizian P, Florman SS, Mehta N, Roberts JP, Emamaullee JA, Genyk Y, Hernandez-Alejandro R, Tomiyama K, Sasaki K, Hashimoto K, Nagai S, Abouljoud M, Olthoff KM, Hoteit MA, Heimbach J, Taner T, Liapakis AH, Mulligan DC, Sapisochin G, Halazun KJ. Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Within and Outside Traditional Selection Criteria: A Multicentric North American Experience. Ann Surg 2024; 279:104-111. [PMID: 37522174 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate long-term oncologic outcomes of patients post-living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) within and outside standard transplantation selection criteria and the added value of the incorporation of the New York-California (NYCA) score. BACKGROUND LDLT offers an opportunity to decrease the liver transplantation waitlist, reduce waitlist mortality, and expand selection criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS Primary adult LDLT recipients between October 1999 and August 2019 were identified from a multicenter cohort of 12 North American centers. Posttransplantation and recurrence-free survival were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Three hundred sixty LDLTs were identified. Patients within Milan criteria (MC) at transplantation had a 1, 5, and 10-year posttransplantation survival of 90.9%, 78.5%, and 64.1% versus outside MC 90.4%, 68.6%, and 57.7% ( P = 0.20), respectively. For patients within the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) criteria, respective posttransplantation survival was 90.6%, 77.8%, and 65.0%, versus outside UCSF 92.1%, 63.8%, and 45.8% ( P = 0.08). Fifty-three (83%) patients classified as outside MC at transplantation would have been classified as either low or acceptable risk with the NYCA score. These patients had a 5-year overall survival of 72.2%. Similarly, 28(80%) patients classified as outside UCSF at transplantation would have been classified as a low or acceptable risk with a 5-year overall survival of 65.3%. CONCLUSIONS Long-term survival is excellent for patients with HCC undergoing LDLT within and outside selection criteria, exceeding the minimum recommended 5-year rate of 60% proposed by consensus guidelines. The NYCA categorization offers insight into identifying a substantial proportion of patients with HCC outside the MC and the UCSF criteria who still achieve similar post-LDLT outcomes as patients within the criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommy Ivanics
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Marco P A W Claasen
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Benjamin Samstein
- Department of Surgery, Division of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Jean C Emond
- Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Medical Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, NY
| | - Alyson N Fox
- Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Medical Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, NY
| | - Elizabeth Pomfret
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - James Pomposelli
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Parissa Tabrizian
- Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Sander S Florman
- Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Neil Mehta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - John P Roberts
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Yuri Genyk
- Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Koji Tomiyama
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation/Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Rochester, NY
| | - Kazunari Sasaki
- Department of Surgery-Abdominal Transplantation, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Koji Hashimoto
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Shunji Nagai
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit
| | - Marwan Abouljoud
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit
| | - Kim M Olthoff
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Maarouf A Hoteit
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Julie Heimbach
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Timucin Taner
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | - Gonzalo Sapisochin
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Karim J Halazun
- NYU Langone Transplant Institute, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cacicedo ML, Limeres MJ, Gehring S. mRNA-Based Approaches to Treating Liver Diseases. Cells 2022; 11:3328. [PMID: 36291194 PMCID: PMC9601253 DOI: 10.3390/cells11203328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Diseases that affect the liver account for approximately 2 million deaths worldwide each year. The increasing prevalence of these diseases and the limited efficacy of current treatments are expected to stimulate substantial growth in the global market for therapeutics that target the liver. Currently, liver transplantation is the only curative option available for many liver diseases. Gene therapy represents a valuable approach to treatment. The liver plays a central role in a myriad of essential metabolic functions, making it an attractive organ for gene therapy; hepatocytes comprise the most relevant target. To date, viral vectors constitute the preferred approach to targeting hepatocytes with genes of therapeutic interest. Alternatively, mRNA-based therapy offers a number of comparative advantages. Clinical and preclinical studies undertaken to treat inherited metabolic diseases affecting the liver, cirrhosis and fibrosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatitis B, and cytomegalovirus using lipid nanoparticle-encapsulated mRNAs that encode the therapeutic or antigenic protein of interest are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximiliano L. Cacicedo
- Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Mainz of the Johannes-Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Melendez-Torres J, Singal AG. Early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: roadmap for improvement. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2022; 22:621-632. [PMID: 35514249 PMCID: PMC9845108 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2022.2074404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a poor prognosis, related, in part, to frequent late-stage diagnosis. Improved implementation of effective HCC surveillance is critical to reduce HCC mortality. AREAS COVERED We performed a targeted literature review to identify intervention targets for improving HCC surveillance effectiveness, including enriched risk stratification tools, improved surveillance tools with higher accuracy for early HCC detection, and increasing surveillance adherence. EXPERT OPINION HCC surveillance has been demonstrated to be efficacious in several cohort studies but has lower surveillance effectiveness in clinical practice. HCC surveillance is currently recommended in all patients with cirrhosis, and improved risk stratification using clinical risk scores, genetic scores, and novel biomarkers are important to move from a 'one-size-fits-all' strategy to one more aligned with values of precision medicine. Current surveillance modalities, ultrasound, and AFP, miss over one-third of HCC at an early stage and are associated with potential surveillance harms, underscoring a need for alternative surveillance strategies with higher accuracy. MRI- and biomarker-based surveillance strategies have promising early data in phase II studies but require validation in phase III cohorts before routine use in practice. Finally, surveillance is underused in clinical practice, highlighting a need for intervention strategies to increase utilization.
Collapse
|
4
|
Percutaneous ablation versus surgical ablation and resection of liver tumors: medicare volume and physician reimbursement trends from 2010 to 2018. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:4056-4061. [PMID: 33772616 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03054-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to analyze trends in Medicare volume and physician reimbursement for percutaneous ablation, surgical ablation, and resection of liver tumors from 2010 to 2018. METHODS Claims from the Medicare Part B PSPSMF for the years 2010 to 2018 were extracted using the CPT codes for percutaneous and surgical ablation of liver tumors and surgical liver resection. Total procedural volume and physician payment were analyzed by procedure and physician specialty. RESULTS From 2010 to 2018, the volume of percutaneous ablation of liver tumors increased 94.3% from 1630 to 3168 procedures, and the volume of surgical ablations increased 86.2% from 593 to 1104 procedures. In contrast, there was a 16.8% decrease in liver resections from 10,807 to 8994 procedures. Physician reimbursement for percutaneous ablation decreased from $702.41 to $610.11 (- 13.1%). Conversely, reimbursement for resection increased from $849.18 to $1015.06 (19.5%). Reimbursement for surgical ablation also increased from $722.36 to $744.25 (3.0%). In 2018, physician reimbursement for resection and surgical ablation were 66% and 22% more than that for percutaneous ablation. CONCLUSION An increasing number of patients with liver tumors were treated with percutaneous ablation from 2010 to 2018. Despite higher morbidity, a dwindling set of theoretical advantages over percutaneous ablation, and higher overall costs, the volume of surgical ablation also increased over this time period. The findings of this study suggest that a reevaluation of practice and referral patterns for surgical ablation of liver tumors is warranted in many institutions.
Collapse
|
5
|
Lee YT, Wang JJ, Luu M, Noureddin M, Kosari K, Agopian VG, Rich NE, Lu SC, Tseng HR, Nissen NN, Singal AG, Yang JD. The Mortality and Overall Survival Trends of Primary Liver Cancer in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 113:1531-1541. [PMID: 34010422 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent trends of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) mortality and outcome remain unknown in the United States (US). We investigated the recent trends of primary liver cancer (excluding intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma) mortality and HCC stage, treatment, and overall survival (OS) in the US. METHODS US Cancer Mortality database was analyzed to investigate the trend of primary liver cancer mortality. We analyzed the SEER 18 database to assess the temporal trend of tumor size, stage, treatment, and OS of HCC. Cox regression analysis investigated the association between HCC diagnosis year and OS. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS During 2000-2018, liver cancer mortality rates increased until 2013, plateaued during 2013-2016 (annual percent change [APC] = 0.1%/yr, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -2.1% to 2.4%; P=0.92), and started to decline during 2016-2018 (APC = -1.5%/yr, 95% CI= -3.2% to 0.2%; P=0.08). However, mortality continues to increase in American Indians/Alaska Natives, individuals aged 65 or older, and in 33 states. There was a 0.61% (95% CI = 0.53% to 0.69%; P<0.001) increase in localized stage HCC and 0.86 mm (95% CI= -1.10 to -0.62; P<0.001) decrease in median tumor size per year. One-year OS rate increased from 36.3% (95% CI = 34.3% to 38.3%) to 58.1% (95% CI = 56.9% to 59.4%) during 2000-2015, and five-year OS rate almost doubled from 11.7% (95% CI = 10.4% to 13.1%) to 21.3% (95% CI = 20.2% to 22.4%) during 2000-2011. Diagnosis year (per year) (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.96 to 0.97) was independently associated with OS in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS Primary liver cancer mortality rates have started to decline in the US with demographic and state-level variation. With an increasing detection of localized HCC, the OS of HCC has improved over the past decades.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Te Lee
- California NanoSystems Institute, Crump Institute for Molecular Imaging.,Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology
| | - Jasmine J Wang
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology.,Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute
| | - Michael Luu
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center
| | - Mazen Noureddin
- Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.,Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kambiz Kosari
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Vatche G Agopian
- Department of Surgery.,Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nicole E Rich
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Shelly C Lu
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute.,Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
| | - Hsian-Rong Tseng
- California NanoSystems Institute, Crump Institute for Molecular Imaging.,Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology
| | - Nicholas N Nissen
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute.,Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Amit G Singal
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Ju Dong Yang
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute.,Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.,Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|