[Suggestion of the Relative Artifact Index for Noise-independent Evaluation of the Streak Artifact]

Artifact reduction in low and ultra-low dose chest computed tomography for patients with pacemaker: A phantom study

INTRODUCTION

Implanted pacemakers (PM) would decrease the detection of lung nodules in chest computed tomography (CT) due to the metal artifact. This study aimed to explore the computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) detectability of pulmonary nodules for the patients implanted with PMs in low- and ultra-low-dose chest CT screening.

METHODS

Four different sizes of artificial nodules were placed in an anthropomorphic chest phantom with two alternative diameters utilized. A commercially available PM was placed on the surface of the left chest wall of the phantom. The image acquisitions were performed with 120 kV and 150 kV with a dedicated selective photon shield made of tin filter (Sn150 kV) at low- and ultra-low- radiation doses (1.0 and 0.5 mGy of volume CT dose index), and reconstructed with and without Iterative Metal Artifact Reduction (iMAR, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). The relative artifact index (AIr) was calculated as an index of metal artifacts, and the nodule detectability was evaluated with a CAD system.

RESULTS

Sn150 kV reduced AIr in all acquisitions when comparing 120 kV and Sn150 kV. Although PM reduced the detectability of nodules, Sn150 kV showed higher detectability compared to 120 kV. The use of iMAR showed inconsistent results in nodule detectability.

CONCLUSION

Sn150 kV reduced PM-induced metal artifacts and improved nodule detectability with CAD compared to 120 kV acquisition in many conditions including low and ultra-low doses and large phantoms, but iMAR did not improve the detectability.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Based on the results of the current phantom study, low and ultra-low dose with Sn150 kV acquisition reduced PM-induced metal artifacts and improved nodule detectability.

Gumbel distribution-based technique enables quantitative comparison between streak metal artifacts of multidetector row CT and cone-beam CT: a phantom study

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), derived from multidetector row CT (MDCT), has a high spatial resolution and has recently been applied to various organs. One of the severe limitations common to CBCT and MDCT is metal artifacts. In particular, streak metal artifacts (SMAs) between multiple metal materials often hinder diagnosis. However, no studies have quantitatively compared the strength of SMAs in MDCT and CBCT. Nomura et al. reported an evaluation method specialized in SMAs of CBCT using the Gumbel distribution (GD), which can also be applied to SMAs of MDCT (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 131: 494-502, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OOOO.2020.08.031 ). This study aimed to quantitatively compare SMAs occurring between titanium materials on MDCT and CBCT images using the GD-based method. The SMAs were investigated as follows: A hydroxyapatite block was sandwiched between two titanium rods to generate an SMA. They were placed in an acrylic phantom, simulating a human head, and scanned using an MDCT scanner and two CBCT scanners. The obtained images were analyzed using Gumbel plots and location parameters, and the SMA strength was calculated. The results showed that the SMAs on the MDCT images were significantly weaker than those on the CBCT images. In the CBCT scans, a smaller volume CT dose index value caused stronger SMAs. These results indicate that MDCT is more advantageous than CBCT in terms of SMA reduction when bone morphology between titanium materials must be evaluated. The characteristic should be considered in clinical cases.

Influence of field of view size and reconstruction methods on single-energy metal artifact reduction: a phantom study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of single-energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) for metal artifacts using CT images reconstructed with adaptive iterative dose reduction three dimensional (AIDR3D) and advanced intelligent clear-IQ engine (AiCE) in calibration-field of view of various sizes. A prosthetic hip joint was arranged at the center of the phantom. The phantom images were scanned by changing calibration-field of view of 320 mm and 500 mm, and were reconstructed using filtered back-projection (FBP), AIDR3D, and AiCE with and without SEMAR, respectively. The metal artifact reduction with SEMAR was evaluated by calculated the relative artifact index value and visual scores in degree of artifact by seven radiology technologists. Relative artifact index of FBP, AIDR3D, and AiCE with 320 mm/500 mm calibration-field of views were 10.2/10.0, 16.3/16.4, and 17.8/17.9 without SEMAR, 3.3/3.1, 2.6/2.5, and 2.3/2.0 with SEMAR, respectively. Visual scores were not significantly different between 320 and 500 mm calibration-field of views in all reconstruction methods. The effect of metal artifact reduction was not affected by calibration-field of view sizes in the SEMAR combined with AIDR3D or AiCE.

Evaluation of streak metal artifacts in cone beam computed tomography by using the Gumbel distribution: a phantom study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to confirm whether streak metal artifacts (SMAs) between titanium implants on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images could be evaluated by using the Gumbel distribution (GD). Moreover, the influence of different scan settings on SMAs was investigated.

STUDY DESIGN

An iodine solution simulating dentin was placed between 2 titanium rods in an acrylic phantom. It was scanned by using CBCT at 2 settings with nearly equivalent exposure doses (90 kV, 7 mA; 78 kV, 10 mA). The images were analyzed, and the dependence of the voxel values in SMAs on GD was investigated with the coefficient of determination (r²). The location parameters, indicating the strength of the SMAs, were calculated for each scan setting and evaluated with the Mann-Whitney U test. Significance was established at p = .05.

RESULTS

The SMAs on CBCT images depended on GD (r² ≥ .959). The SMAs with the 78 kV, 10 mA settings were significantly smaller than those with the 90 kV, 7 mA settings (p < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

SMAs on CBCT images could be evaluated by using methods based on GD. The strengths of metal artifacts varied with changes in scan settings, even at nearly equivalent exposure doses.