An analysis of tacrolimus-related complications in the first 30 days after liver transplantation

Machine-learning model to predict the tacrolimus concentration and suggest optimal dose in liver transplantation recipients: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

Titrating tacrolimus concentration in liver transplantation recipients remains a challenge in the early post-transplant period. This multicenter retrospective cohort study aimed to develop and validate a machine-learning algorithm to predict tacrolimus concentration. Data from 443 patients undergoing liver transplantation between 2017 and 2020 at an academic hospital in South Korea were collected to train machine-learning models. Long short-term memory (LSTM) and gradient-boosted regression tree (GBRT) models were developed using time-series doses and concentrations of tacrolimus with covariates of age, sex, weight, height, liver enzymes, total bilirubin, international normalized ratio, albumin, serum creatinine, and hematocrit. We conducted performance comparisons with linear regression and populational pharmacokinetic models, followed by external validation using the eICU Collaborative Research Database collected in the United States between 2014 and 2015. In the external validation, the LSTM outperformed the GBRT, linear regression, and populational pharmacokinetic models with median performance error (8.8%, 25.3%, 13.9%, and - 11.4%, respectively; P < 0.001) and median absolute performance error (22.3%, 33.1%, 26.8%, and 23.4%, respectively; P < 0.001). Dosing based on the LSTM model's suggestions achieved therapeutic concentrations more frequently on the chi-square test (P < 0.001). Patients who received doses outside the suggested range were associated with longer ICU stays by an average of 2.5 days (P = 0.042). In conclusion, machine learning models showed excellent performance in predicting tacrolimus concentration in liver transplantation recipients and can be useful for concentration titration in these patients.

Regular protocol liver biopsy is useful to adjust immunosuppressant dose after adult liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Adjusting immunosuppression to minimal levels post-adult liver transplantation (LT) is critical; however, graft rejection has been reported in LT recipients with normal liver function evaluated by liver biopsy (LBx). Continual protocol liver biopsy (PLB) is performed regularly in LT recipients with normal liver function in some centers; however, its usefulness remains inadequately evaluated. This study aimed to assess retrospectively the usefulness of late PLB after adult LT.

METHODS

LBx evaluations of LT recipients with normal liver function and hepatitis B and C virus seronegativity were defined as PLB. The cases requiring immunosuppressive therapy for rejection findings based on Banff criteria were extracted from the PLBs, and pathological data collected before and after immunosuppressive dosage adjustment (based on modified histological activity index [HAI] score) were compared.

RESULTS

Among 548 LBx cases, 213 LBx in 110 recipients fulfilled the inclusion criteria for PLB. Immunosuppressive therapy after PLB was intensified in 14 LBx (6.6%) recipients (12.7%); of these, nine had late-onset acute rejection, three had isolated perivenular inflammation, one had plasma cell-rich rejection, and one had early chronic rejection. Follow-up LBx after immunosuppressive dose adjustment showed improvement in the modified HAI score grading in 10 of 14 cases (71.4%). No clinical background and blood examination data, including those from the post-LT period, immunosuppressant trough level, or examination for de novo DSA, predicted rejection in PLB. Complications of PLB were found in only three cases.

CONCLUSION

PLB is useful in the management of seemingly stable LT recipients, to discover subclinical rejection and allow for appropriate immunosuppressant dose adjustment.

Distribution evaluation of tacrolimus in the ascitic fluid of liver transplant recipients with liver cirrhosis by a sensitive ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method

Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic index and large individual differences in pharmacokinetics. The distribution of tacrolimus in ascitic fluid and its influence on whole-blood tacrolimus were unclear. In this study, a sensitive ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was established and validated for the quantification of tacrolimus in the ascitic fluid of liver transplant recipients. Chromatographic separation was achieved on an Agilent ZORBAX Eclipse Plus Phenyl-Hexyl column (2.1 × 100 mm, 3.5 μm). Mass spectrometry was performed in multiple reaction monitoring conditions of transitions m/z 821.4→768.5 for tacrolimus. The concentrations of tacrolimus in the ascitic fluid range from 0.2 to 3.0 ng/mL, accounting for 1.19-31.87% of whole-blood tacrolimus concentrations. A linear mixed model showed a statistically significant positive correlation between the steady-state trough blood concentration of tacrolimus and the corresponding amount of tacrolimus excreted in the ascitic fluid for 24 consecutive hours, especially after normalization by daily dose per unit body weight. These data suggested that the distribution of tacrolimus in the ascitic fluid has great individual differences. The whole-blood tacrolimus concentration, dose per unit body weight, and other confounding factors may contribute to the excretion of tacrolimus in ascitic fluid, but the influence of tacrolimus excretion in drained ascitic fluid on the whole-blood tacrolimus concentration is negligible.

Clinical significance of personalized tacrolimus dosing by adjusting to donor CYP3A-status in liver transplant recipients

Donor's CYP3A-status (CYP3A5 genotype and CYP3A4 expression) can provide prognostic information regarding tacrolimus-metabolizing capacity of the liver graft and initial tacrolimus dosing for therapeutic blood concentrations in liver transplants. The present work prospectively investigated whether CYP3A-status guided tacrolimus therapy has any potential clinical benefit for recipients in the early postoperative period.

METHODS

The contribution of preliminary assaying of donor CYP3A-status to the optimization of initial tacrolimus therapy and to the reduction of adverse events (acute rejection, infection, nephrotoxicity) was investigated in 112 liver transplant recipients (CYPtest group) comparing to 101 control patients on tacrolimus concentration guided therapy.

RESULTS

The time for achieving therapeutic tacrolimus concentration was significantly reduced, confirming potential benefit of initial tacrolimus therapy adjusted to donor's CYP3A-status over classical clinical practice of tacrolimus concentration guided treatment (4 vs 8 days, P < 0.0001). Acute rejection episodes (3.6 vs 23.8%, P < 0.0001) and tacrolimus induced nephrotoxicity (8 vs 27%, P = 0.0004) were less frequent in CYPtest group than in control patients, whereas occurrence of infectious disease was not influenced by tacrolimus dosing strategy (3.6 vs 5.9% in CYPtest and control groups, P > 0.05). Acute rejection was often accompanied with tacrolimus blood concentrations lower than 10 ng mL^-1 (20/24 of control and 2/4 of CYPtest patients), while nephrotoxicity was associated with high tacrolimus concentrations (>20 ng mL^-1 ) in the first week after transplantation (13/27 of control and 2/9 of CYPtest patients).

CONCLUSION

CYP3A-status guided therapy significantly improved the risk of misdosing induced early adverse effects (acute rejection, nephrotoxicity).

Once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus versus twice-daily tacrolimus in liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE

For patients who have received a kidney transplant, studies have shown that once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus (TAC) has similar efficacy and safety to standard twice-daily dosing. The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness and safety of daily TAC (TAC qd) versus standard twice-daily TAC (TAC bid) administration in liver transplantation (LT).

DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We systematically searched the PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for studies comparing outcomes of LT patients who received TAC qd versus TAC bid.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Six studies, which included 5179 LT recipients (TAC qd = 951; TAC bid = 4228) were included in the analysis. The TAC qd group had a low 1-year graft loss rate (OR 0.70 [95% CI 0.54-0.91], P = 0.008) and lower rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) at 90 days (OR 0.46 [95% CI 0.24-0.89], P = 0.02) compared with the TAC bid group. There was no significant difference in 1-year mortality or the incidence of adverse events after LT between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests that TAC qd is safe and effective for LT patients during the first year after transplantation. Longer-term follow-up studies are necessary to determine if TAC qd is safe and effective beyond the first year after LT.

Successful Liver Transplantation Case Report from a Deceased Donor with Sickle Cell Anemia

There is a worldwide problem of waiting time and mortality rate associated with remaining on the waiting list for a liver transplant. However, some situations have been encouraging in terms of determining appropriate recipients and expanding the donor criteria. We herein report a case of useful liver donor with sickle cell anemia for liver transplantation. Here we described a case of liver transplantation from a donor with sickle cell anemia to a recipient with hepatocellular carcinoma who was deemed to be at risk of tumor growth and at risk of being dropped from the waiting list. The literature reveals the importance of using safe donors, and we describe the benefits of using a safe, deceased liver donor with sickle cell anemia who was an adequate option for liver transplantation.

Late acute rejection in liver transplant: a systematic review

Introduction:

Late acute rejection leads to worse patient and graft survival after liver transplantation.

Aim:

To analyze the reported results published in recent years by leading transplant centers in evaluating late acute rejection and update the clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment of liver transplantation.

Method:

Systematic literature review through Medline-PubMed database with headings related to late acute rejection in articles published until November 2013 was done. Were analyzed demographics, immunosuppression, rejection, infection and graft and patient survival rates.

Results:

Late acute rejection in liver transplantation showed poor results mainly regarding patient and graft survival. Almost all of these cohort studies were retrospective and descriptive. The incidence of late acute rejection varied from 7-40% in these studies. Late acute rejection was one cause for graft loss and resulted in different outcomes with worse patient and graft survival after liver transplant. Late acute rejection has been variably defined and may be a cause of chronic rejection with worse prognosis. Late acute rejection occurs during a period in which the goal is to maintain lower immunosuppression after liver transplantation.

Conclusion:

The current articles show the importance of late acute rejection. The real benefit is based on early diagnosis and adequate treatment at the onset until late follow up after liver transplantation.