Experimental implantation of an arterial substitute made of silicone reinforced with polyester fabric in rabbits

Peritoneal Pre-conditioning Method for In Vivo Vascular Graft Maturation Utilizing a Porous Pouch

Tissue-engineered vascular grafts (TEVGs) require strategies to allow graft remodeling but avoid stenosis and loss of graft mechanics. A variety of promising biomaterials and methods to incorporate cells have been tested, but intimal hyperplasia and graft thrombosis are still concerning when grafting in small-diameter arteries. Here, we describe a strategy using the peritoneal cavity as an "in vivo" bioreactor to recruit autologous cells to electrospun conduits, which can improve the in vivo response after aortic grafting. We focus on the methods for a novel hydrogel pouch design to enclose the electrospun conduits that can avoid peritoneal adhesion but still allow infiltration of peritoneal fluid and cells needed to provide benefits when subsequently grafting in the aorta.

Experimental comparative study of arterial implants made of silicone reinforced with polyester fabric and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) in rabbits aorta

OBJECTIVES

the aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of a new silicone vascular prostheses with PTFE vascular prostheses, on a rabbit experimental model.

METHODS

forty rabbits underwent infra-renal aorta replacement with 4 mm diameter prostheses, twenty animals with PDMS and twenty animals with PTFE (control group). Retrograde aortic angiography was performed to assess patency. Histological graft samples were examined by electron microscopy to evaluate prostheses endothelialization.

RESULTS

patency rates were 100% for both grafts after 30 days; after 60 days, patency rate for PDMS was 92.3% (±7.4), and 73,8% (±13.1) at 90 days. PTFE grafts had patency rates of 87.5% (±11.7) at 60 and 90 days. No statistically significant difference was found in between groups for patency rates (p=0.62). Postoperative complications (death, paraplegia) rates (p=0.526) and aortic clamping times (p=0.299) were comparable in both groups. No statistically significant difference for stenosis was found on angiographical analysis between groups (p=0.650). Electron microscopy revealed limited anastomotic endothelial ingrowth in both prostheses.

CONCLUSION

in this experimental model, PDMS and PTFE vascular prostheses had comparable outcomes and PDMS prosthesis could be used as a vascular graft.