Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration combined with either endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration or endoscopic ultrasound using the EBUS scope-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing and staging mediastinal diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Pulmonary endoscopy - central to an interventional pulmonology program

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary endoscopy occupies a central role in Interventional Pulmonology and is frequently the mainstay of diagnosis of respiratory disease, in particular lung malignancy. Older techniques such as rigid bronchoscopy maintain an important role in central airway obstruction. Renewed interest in the peripheral pulmonary nodule is driving major advances in technologies to increase the diagnostic accuracy and advance new potential endoscopic therapeutic options.

AREAS COVERED

This paper describes the role of pulmonary endoscopy, in particular ultrasound in the diagnosis and staging of lung malignancy. We will explore the recent expansion of ultrasound to include endoscopic ultrasound - bronchoscopy (EUS-B) and combined ultrasound (CUS) techniques. We will discuss in detail the advances in the workup of the peripheral pulmonary nodule.We performed a non-systematic, narrative review of the literature to summarize the evidence regarding the indications, diagnostic yield, and safety of current bronchoscopic sampling techniques.

EXPERT OPINION

EBUS/EUS-B has revolutionized the diagnosis and staging of thoracic malignancy resulting in more accurate assessment of the mediastinum compared to mediastinoscopy alone, thus reducing the rate of futile thoracotomies. Although major advances in the assessment of the peripheral pulmonary nodule have been made, the role of endoscopy in this area requires further clarification and investigation.

Additional benefit of endoscopic ultrasound with bronchoscope-guided fine needle aspiration to endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in the evaluation of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and endoscopic ultrasound with bronchoscope-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-B-FNA) are minimally invasive procedures for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. This study aimed to investigate the additional diagnostic value of EUS-B-FNA following EBUS-TBNA.

Methods

We performed a systematic literature review of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register databases and extracted the studies reporting the implementation of the combined EBUS-TBNA/EUS-B-FNA. A proportional meta-analysis was conducted to determine the pooled diagnostic yield of this procedure.

Results

We identified nine studies involving 2,375 patients. The overall pooled diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA alone and combined EBUS-TBNA/EUS-B-FNA was 0.87 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79-0.95, I2=96.55%] and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.85-0.99, I2=97.89%), respectively. Adding EUS-B-FNA to EBUS-TBNA increased the diagnostic yield by approximately 0.05. There was statistical heterogeneity among the studies (I2=54.49%). Among the 832 patients in seven studies, additional diagnostic benefits of EUS-B-FNA were observed in 37 lesions. The most common diagnosed lesion was in station 4L (n=10), followed by station 5 (n=8) and station 7 (n=8).

Conclusions

In pooled estimates, the addition of EUS-B-FNA to EBUS-TBNA increased the diagnostic yield for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. Nodal station 4L, station 5, and station 8 were lesions frequently diagnosed by the addition of EUS-B-FNA. Because of statistical between-study heterogeneity, our findings should be interpreted with caution.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using the bronchial ultrasound scope (EUS-B-FNA) for diagnosing pancreatic metastasis in a lung cancer patient case report

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNA) of the pancreas is performed routinely in many endoscopic centers as part of the diagnostic set-up for suspected pancreatic cancer. The use of transesophageal bronchoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-B-FNA) by pulmonologists has expanded significantly, since it enables effective diagnosis of lesions in the mediastinum and upper abdomen. The following case demonstrates the safety and feasibility of EUS-B-FNA in a patient with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cancer and a pancreatic mass of unknown origin. A patient who was previously diagnosed with NSCLC was referred to the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital due to suspected recurrence of NSCLC. The patient underwent endobronchial ultrasound guided (EBUS)-FNA from several suspected mediastinal lymph nodes and combined EUS-B-FNA from a pancreatic mass during the same procedure. Pathology results from the pancreatic mass and from the mediastinal lymph nodes showed squamous-cell carcinoma, metastasis from the previous NSCLC. We here by demonstrated that EUS-B-FNA is a feasible and safe technique to obtain tissue samples from pancreatic lesions in patients under investigation for lung cancer.

Transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound with bronchoscope-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnostic and staging purposes: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound with bronchoscope-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-B-FNA) is a feasible and well-tolerated modality that is increasingly used to diagnose intrathoracic lesions. This narrative review summarizes the current application of EUS-B-FNA for diagnosing lung cancer, thoracic sarcoidosis, and metastases from extrathoracic malignancies.

Methods

A comprehensive and systematic online literature search via Medline/PubMed for the period January 2005 to December 2022 was conducted for articles published using the keywords "EUS-B-FNA", "endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA)", "endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA)", "lung cancer", "staging", and "sarcoidosis".

Key Content and Findings

Recent data prove the efficacy and safety of EUS-B-FNA for providing complete lung cancer staging, when combined with EBUS-TBNA, and in the evaluation of para-esophageal lesions. EUS-B-FNA allows access to inferior mediastinal lymph nodes and para-esophageal masses that are not accessible by EBUS-TBNA. Additional advantages of using EUS-B-FNA include significantly lower doses of anesthetics and sedatives, a shorter procedural time, fewer incidents of oxygen desaturation due to a poor respiratory reserve, significantly less cough, and higher operator satisfaction. Moreover, this procedure can be performed sequentially in the same setting with EBUS-TBNA by one operator. Other benefits include a lower cost, a single setting, and scope use.

Conclusions

As EUS-B-FNA and EBUS-TBNA have complementary access to the mediastinum, the diagnostic yield of EUS-B-FNA combined with EBUS-TBNA is higher than that of endosonographic techniques alone in the diagnostic workup of intrathoracic lesions.

Mediastinal Nodal Staging Performance of Combined Endobronchial and Esophageal Endosonography in Lung Cancer Cases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

By searching lliteratures till January 5, 2022, we evaluated the role of the mediastinal nodal staging of endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EBUS) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS) in lung cancer. A total of 20 studies with 2,961 patients were included in this study. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, and NLR for EBUS were 0.79, 0.97, 27.29, and 0.25, respectively. EUS showed staging performance similar to EBUS. The staging performance was significantly improved when combining EBUS + EUS.

Severe mediastinitis and pericarditis after endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: A case report

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a safe and minimally invasive diagnostic tool for mediastinal and hilum evaluation. However, infectious complications may occur after EBUS-TBNA. Among these, mediastinitis and pericarditis are rare.

CASE SUMMARY

A 67-year-old woman was referred to our hospital due to paratracheal lymph node enlargement on chest computed tomography (CT). EBUS-TBNA was performed on the lymph node lesions, and prophylactic oral antibiotics were administered. Seven days after EBUS-TBNA, the patient visited the emergency room with a high fever and chest pain. Laboratory test results revealed leukocytosis with a left shift and elevated C-reactive protein level (25.7 mg/dL). Chest CT revealed the formation of a mediastinal abscess in the right paratracheal lymph node and pericardial and bilateral pleural effusions. The patient received intravenous antibiotic treatment, cardiac drainage through pericardiocentesis, and surgical management. The patient recovered favorably and was discharged 31 d after the operation.

CONCLUSION

Mediastinitis and pericarditis after EBUS-TBNA are rare but should be considered even after the use of prophylactic antibiotics.

The Value of a Systematic Protocol Using Endobronchial Ultrasound and Endoscopic Ultrasound in Staging of Lung Cancer for Patients with Imaging iN0–N1 Disease

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> We hypothesize that systematic, combined, and multidisciplinary study of the mediastinum (endobronchial ultrasound [EBUS] and endoscopic ultrasound [EUS]) in patients with NSCLC with radiologically normal mediastinum improves the results of mediastinal staging obtained with EBUS alone. <b><i>Material and Methods:</i></b> A retrospective study of the prospective database collected on the patients with NSCLC with a radiologically normal mediastinum and an indication for systematic staging with EBUS and EUS. EBUS staging was followed by EUS in patients in which the results from the pathological analysis of EBUS were negative. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Forty-five patients were included in the analysis. The combination of EBUS followed by EUS provided better results than EBUS alone: sensitivity (S) 95% versus 80%, negative predictive value (NPV) 96.15% versus 86.21%, negative likelihood ratio 0.05 versus 0.20, and post-test probability 3.8% versus 13.8%. This represents an increase in S (15%), the validity index (6.6%), and NPV (9.9%) compared to EBUS alone. There were 4 false negatives (FNs) (8.8%) with the EBUS test alone. After adding EUS, 3 more cases were positive (6.6%) and only 1 FN (2.2%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In patients with NSCLC and a radiographically normal mediastinum, a systematic and combined staging with EBUS and EUS show higher sensitivity in the detection of mediastinal metastasis than with the use of EBUS alone. The high accuracy of the test means that the use of mediastinoscopy is not necessary to confirm the results in these patients. Since the availability of EUS is low, it may be advisable for the interventional pulmonologist to receive training in EUS-b.