Comments on "Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus parasacral stimulation in the treatment of overactive bladder in elderly people: A triple-blinded randomized controlled trial"

Treatment for overactive bladder: A meta-analysis of tibial versus parasacral neuromodulation

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of parasacral neuromodulation (PNS) versus tibial nerve stimulation (TNS) for patients with overactive bladder (OAB).

METHODS

Databases including PubMed, Embase, clinicalTrial.gov, and Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched from January 1, 1999 to September 9, 2022. The improvements in a 3-day voiding diary were set as the primary outcomes. Then, the scores of overactive bladder-validated 8-question awareness tool (OAB-V8), King's health questionnaire (KHQ), and international consultation on incontinence questionnaire overactive bladder (ICIQ-OAB) were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Five articles (4 randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and 1 prospective study) including 255 OAB patients were enrolled. Two kinds of neuromodulations had similar performances in the micturition (mean difference [MD] = 0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.51 to 1.04, P = .50), urgency episodes (MD = -0.16, 95% CI: -0.64 to 0.31, P = .50), incontinence episodes (MD = 0.09, 95% CI: -0.41 to 0.59, P = .72), as well as in the nocturia episodes (MD = 0.04, 95% CI: -0.45 to 0.52, P = .89). Furthermore, there was no difference regarding ICIQ-OAB scores (P = .83), KHQ (P = .91), and OAB-V8 scores (P = .83). Importantly, included studies reported no adverse events in the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

TNS and PNS had similar effectiveness for the treatment of OAB, moreover, without any identified adverse events in both groups. However, well-designed RCTs are stilled needed to verify our results.