Efficacy of pamidronate in pediatric osteosarcoma patients with low bone mineral density

Prevalence of low bone mineral density and risk of fractures in osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma survivors: A scoping review

Background

The clinical outcomes of patients with pediatric cancer have significantly improved over the past few decades. However, the treatments are often highly intensive and can advertently pose a risk for developing various health conditions, including bone mass loss and fragility fractures. Since patients with bone malignancies, such as osteosarcoma (OS) and Ewing's sarcoma (ES), require musculoskeletal surgery as well as chemotherapy, OS/ES survivors are potentially at even greater risk of developing these musculoskeletal conditions than those with other types of cancer. However, these issues in OS/ES survivors are often overlooked by clinicians treating childhood cancers. Thus, this scoping review was designed and conducted to better understand the bone health conditions in OS/ES survivors.

Design

We conducted a literature search and included the studies that describe bone mineral density in association with bone health in OS/ES survivors for analysis. Data regarding patients' demographic, diagnosis, bone mineral density, laboratory examinations, and incidence of fractures were extracted and evaluated.

Results

We found that almost half of OS/ES survivors have bone mass deficit and that several factors (such as a frailer physique and younger age at diagnosis) are potentially associated with low bone mass in OS/ES survivors. On the other hand, due to a paucity of information currently available, we could not determine whether long-term OS/ES survivors would ultimately regain bone mass or be at a greater risk of fragility fractures.

Conclusions

This scoping review reveals a previously unappreciated knowledge gap in our understanding of bone health conditions in OS/ES survivors and raises awareness among clinicians and care providers of this condition that OS/ES patients may encounter after successful treatment.

Improving Osteosarcoma Treatment: Comparative Oncology in Action

Osteosarcoma (OSA) is the most common pediatric malignant bone tumor. Although surgery together with neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy has improved survival for localized OSA, most patients develop recurrent/metastatic disease with a dismally poor outcome. Therapeutic options have not improved for these OSA patients in recent decades. As OSA is a rare and "orphan" tumor, with no distinct targetable driver antigens, the development of new efficient therapies is still an unmet and challenging clinical need. Appropriate animal models are therefore critical for advancement in the field. Despite the undoubted relevance of pre-clinical mouse models in cancer research, they present some intrinsic limitations that may be responsible for the low translational success of novel therapies from the pre-clinical setting to the clinic. From this context emerges the concept of comparative oncology, which has spurred the study of pet dogs as a uniquely valuable model of spontaneous OSA that develops in an immune-competent system with high biological and clinical similarities to corresponding human tumors, including in its metastatic behavior and resistance to conventional therapies. For these reasons, the translational power of studies conducted on OSA-bearing dogs has seen increasing recognition. The most recent and relevant veterinary investigations of novel combinatorial approaches, with a focus on immune-based strategies, that can most likely benefit both canine and human OSA patients have been summarized in this commentary.

Osteoporosis in Childhood Cancer Survivors: Physiopathology, Prevention, Therapy and Future Perspectives

The improvement of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgical interventions, together with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, increased childhood cancer survival rate in the last decades, reaching 80% in Europe. Nevertheless, anti-cancer treatments are mainly responsible for the onset of long-term side effects in childhood cancer survivors (CCS), including alterations of the endocrine system function and activity. In particular, the most frequent dysfunction in CCS is a metabolic bone disorder characterized by low bone mineral density (BMD) with increased skeletal fragility. BMD loss is also a consequence of a sedentary lifestyle, malnutrition, and cancer itself could affect BMD, thus inducing osteopenia and osteoporosis. In this paper, we provide an overview of possible causes of bone impairment in CCS in order to propose management strategies for early identification and treatment of skeletal fragility in this population.

Synergistic Anti-Tumor Effect of Simvastatin Combined to Chemotherapy in Osteosarcoma

Simple Summary

Osteosarcoma is the most common form of primary solid bone malignancy, with the highest incidence in adolescence. The therapeutic management includes surgical resection combined with adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens. Despite this multimodal combination, about two patients out of five are still not cured (5-year overall survival rate at 60%). Complementary therapeutic approaches are required to overcome the frequent resistance to conventional chemotherapy. The aim of the present study was to assess the potential benefit of statins as an adjuvant to chemotherapy. We show that simvastatin synergizes with conventional chemotherapy drugs in terms of cell viability, tumor growth, and dissemination and represents valuable alternative adjuvant therapy that needs further investigation in clinical trials.

Abstract

Context: Osteosarcoma is the most common primary solid malignancy of the bone, mainly affecting pediatric patients. The main clinical issues are chemoresistance and metastatic spread, leading to a survival rate stagnating around 60% for four decades. Purpose: Here, we investigated the effect of simvastatin as adjuvant therapy on chemotherapy. Methods: Cell viability was assessed by the MTT test, and a combination index was evaluated by an isobologram approach. Cell motility was assessed by wound-healing assay. Cell-derived xenograft models were established in mice. FFPE tumor samples were assessed by immunohistochemistry. Results: In vitro experiments indicate that simvastatin synergized the conventional chemotherapy drugs’ inhibitory effect on cell viability. Functional assays reveal that simvastatin supplementation favored the anticancer mechanism of action of the tested chemotherapy drugs, such as DNA damage through intercalation or direct alkylation and disorganization of microtubules. Additionally, we show that even though simvastatin alone did not modify tumor behavior, it potentiated the inhibitory effect of doxorubicin on primary tumor growth (+50%, p < 0.05) and metastatic spread (+50%, p < 0.05). Our results provide evidence that simvastatin exerted an anti-tumor effect combined with chemotherapy in the preclinical murine model and represents valuable alternative adjuvant therapy that needs further investigation in clinical trials.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous pamidronate infusion for treating osteoporosis in children and adolescents

PURPOSE

Osteoporosis is a skeletal disorder characterized by reduced bone mass that results in increased risk of fractures. Pediatric osteoporosis can be caused by monogenic diseases, chronic diseases, and/or their treatment. This study was performed to investigate the effect of pamidronate infusion on osteoporosis in children and adolescents.

METHODS

This study included 13 unrelated pediatric patients (10 males and 3 females) whose bone mineral density (BMD) z-score was &lt;-2.0. Pamidronate was administered intravenously at a dosage of 1 mg/kg for 3 consecutive days every 4 months. Clinical and biochemical findings were reviewed retrospectively. The BMD values of the lumbar spine and femoral neck were assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and annually.

RESULTS

The underlying diseases were immobilization (62%), inflammatory bowel disease (23%), protein-losing enteropathy (8%), and idiopathic juvenile osteoporosis (8%). The mean age at the start of treatment was 12.7±4.3 years. Duration of treatment ranged from 12-50 months. The baseline height-standard deviation score (SDS) and weight-SDS were -2.01±2.08 and -2.60±1.62, respectively. The lumbar spine BMD z-scores improved significantly after 1 year of pamidronate treatment, but the femoral neck BMD z-scores did not. However, both z-scores had significantly increased by the end of treatment.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that pamidronate treatment increased BMD in pediatric patients with osteoporosis with no significant adverse events. Further studies are required to better define the long-term efficacy and safety of pamidronate therapy in a large number of pediatric patients.

Do Bisphosphonates Alleviate Pain in Children? A Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this systematic review is to analyze the effectiveness of bisphosphonates (BPs) to treat bone pain in children and adolescents who have diseases with skeletal involvement.

RECENT FINDINGS

We included 24 studies (2 randomized controlled trials, 3 non-randomized controlled trials, 10 non-randomized open-label uncontrolled studies, 8 retrospective studies, and 1 study with design not specified). The majority of included studies assessed pain from a unidimensional approach, with pain intensity the most frequently evaluated dimension. Only 38% of studies used validated tools; visual analogue scale was the most frequently employed. BPs were used to alleviate bone pain in a wide variety of pediatrics conditions such as osteogenesis imperfecta, secondary osteoporosis, osteonecrosis related to chemotherapy, chronic non-bacterial osteitis, idiopathic juvenile osteoporosis, unresectable benign bone tumor, and cancer-related pain. Twenty of the 24 studies reported a positive effect of BPs for alleviating pain in different pathologies, but 58% of the studies were categorized as having high risk of bias. Intravenous BPs are helpful in alleviating bone pain in children and adolescents. It is advised that our results be interpreted with caution due to the heterogeneity of the doses used, duration of treatments, and types of pathologies included. In addition, this review shows the paucity of high-quality evidence in the available literature and further research is needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Before the completion of this review, the protocol was registered to PROSPERO (International prospective register of systematic reviews), PROSPERO 2020 ID # CRD42020158316. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020158316.

Low bone mineral density in children and adolescents with cancer

Maximizing accumulation of bone mass during childhood and adolescence is essential to attaining optimal peak bone mass. Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) have lower bone mineral density (BMD) than the general population. Chemotherapeutic agents including steroids and radiotherapy can affect BMD. Cancer itself, hormonal insufficiency, a poor nutritional state, and a deficit of physical activities during or after treatment also influence BMD in CCS, resulting in failure to achieve appropriate peak bone mass. Low BMD in childhood and adolescence can lead to osteoporosis in adult life and complications such as bone pain, bone deformity, and fractures. Thus, BMD in CCS should be monitored with appropriate intervention. Adequate intake of calcium and vitamin D and an increase in physical activity are recommended. Timely supplements of hormones are needed in some cases. Some publications have reported that bisphosphonate therapies using pamidronate or alendronate were well tolerated in CCS and helped increase BMD.

Bone health in childhood cancer: review of the literature and recommendations for the management of bone health in childhood cancer survivors

In the past decades, new cancer treatment approaches for children and adolescents have led to a decrease in recurrence rates and an increase in long-term survival. Recent studies have focused on the evaluation of the late effects on bone of pediatric cancer-related treatments, such as chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. Treatment of childhood cancer can impair the attainment of peak bone mass, predisposing to premature onset of low bone mineral density, or causing other bone side-effects, such as bone quality impairment or avascular necrosis of bone. Lower bone mineral density and microarchitectural deterioration can persist during adulthood, thereby increasing fracture risk. Overall, long-term follow-up of childhood cancer survivors is essential to define specific groups at higher risk of long-term bone complications, identify unrecognized long-term adverse effects, and improve patient care. Children and adolescents with a cancer history should be carefully monitored, and patients should be informed of possible late complications of their previous medical treatment. The International Osteoporosis Foundation convened a working group to review the bone complications of pediatric cancer survivors, outlining recommendations for the management of bone health, in order to prevent and treat these complications.