Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration: A single-center analysis

Comparation of 5 ml and 10 ml Negative Pressures with Wet-suction Techniques for EUS-FNA of Solid Lesions: A Single-center Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The negative pressure selectable for the wet-suction technique remains uncertain. The aim was to investigate the quality of sampling and diagnostic accuracy with solid lesions by 5 mL and 10 mL negative pressure with wet-suction techniques.

METHODS

This is a single-center, crossover, randomized controlled trial conducted with a random sampling technique. In all, 160 patients consecutively undergoing EUS-FNA for solid lesions were randomized in a ratio of 1:1 into 2 groups, the 5 mL and 10 mL negative pressure wet-suction group. The main outcome was to compare the sample quality between the 2 groups. The secondary outcome was to compare the histologic and cytologic diagnostic accuracy of solid lesions.

RESULTS

Pancreatic (n=129) and nonpancreatic (n=27) lesions from 156 lesions were examined. The sample quality concluding cellularity, adequacy, integrity, and blood contamination were comparable between the 2 groups. However, in subgroup analysis, we found 19G FNA provided more integrity of specimen in 5 mL than in 10 mL group (100% vs. 82.9%, P=0.025). In contrast, this benefit was not noteworthy in the 22G FNA subgroup. And there was no statistically significant in histologic (87.82% vs. 87.18%, P=1.000) and cytologic (78.85% vs. 80.77%, P=0.778) accuracy between 5 mL and 10 mL groups.

CONCLUSION

When using the wet-suction technique, 5 mL and 10 mL negative pressure offer equivalent sample quality and diagnostic accuracy. However, the 19G FNA can obtain better sample quality with 5 mL negative pressure than 10 mL negative pressure.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using the bronchial ultrasound scope (EUS-B-FNA) for diagnosing pancreatic metastasis in a lung cancer patient case report

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNA) of the pancreas is performed routinely in many endoscopic centers as part of the diagnostic set-up for suspected pancreatic cancer. The use of transesophageal bronchoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-B-FNA) by pulmonologists has expanded significantly, since it enables effective diagnosis of lesions in the mediastinum and upper abdomen. The following case demonstrates the safety and feasibility of EUS-B-FNA in a patient with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cancer and a pancreatic mass of unknown origin. A patient who was previously diagnosed with NSCLC was referred to the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital due to suspected recurrence of NSCLC. The patient underwent endobronchial ultrasound guided (EBUS)-FNA from several suspected mediastinal lymph nodes and combined EUS-B-FNA from a pancreatic mass during the same procedure. Pathology results from the pancreatic mass and from the mediastinal lymph nodes showed squamous-cell carcinoma, metastasis from the previous NSCLC. We here by demonstrated that EUS-B-FNA is a feasible and safe technique to obtain tissue samples from pancreatic lesions in patients under investigation for lung cancer.

Fine needle aspiration of bone lesions: A tertiary care centre experience

BACKGROUND

Bone fine needle aspiration (FNA) presents several diagnostic challenges including limited sample material, reduced ability to assess the architecture, and lack of a standardised reporting system. The aim of our study is to present our experience regarding bone FNA.

METHODS

We performed a 6-year retrospective search of our archives to identify all FNA cases of bone lesions. Available data regarding patients' demographics, cytopathology, and surgical pathology were recorded. The FNA cases were then grouped into five categories (atypical, neoplasm-benign, neoplasm of unknown malignant potential, suspicious for malignancy, and malignant) and the risk of malignancy (ROM) was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 341 FNA cases performed in 337 patients (M = 173, F = 164; mean age = 57.2 years) were identified. The iliac crest was the most commonly biopsied site (n = 134). The adequacy of bone FNA was 77.4%. The sensitivity and specificity regarding the nature of the lesion were 96.5% and 100%, respectively. The overall diagnostic accuracy of bone FNA was 77%. The accuracy of bone FNA for non-metastatic bone lesions including non-neoplastic lesions was 74%, while the diagnostic accuracy of bone FNA for a metastatic disease was 83.5%. The diagnostic accuracy for primary neoplastic lesions was 70%. The frequency (n,%) of cytomorphological categories were as follows: atypical (30, 8.8%); neoplasm-benign (6, 1.8%); neoplasm of unknown malignant potential (18, 5.3%); suspicious for malignancy (4, 1.2%); and malignant (145, 42.5%). The ROM in these categories was respectively as follows: 51.7%, 0%, 46.7%, 100%, and 99.1%.

CONCLUSION

FNA is a sensitive and specific technique for the diagnosis of bone lesions. In most instances, an accurate diagnosis can be achieved if adequate material, ancillary studies, and radiological correlation are available.

Patients' Knowledge About the Endoscopic UltrasoundGuided Fine Needle Aspiration of Pancreas Is Not Enough

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study is to evaluate the extent to which patients acquired necessary knowledge about pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and assess what should be more focused on in the informed consent process.

METHODS

Adult patients enrolled in this study had pancreatic lesions confirmed by regular imaging and planned to undergo the first pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. These patients were asked to complete a questionnaire, including indications, possible results, downstream events, the risk for false-negative and malignant lesions, and so on. Then we conducted a longterm follow-up of these patients to obtain the final results.

RESULTS

Most people (94.25%) correctly recognized that the indication of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration was to exclude malignant lesions. Almost all patients knew that the results could be benign or malignant, while the number of people who were aware of non-diagnostic (22%), indeterminate (18%) outcomes, and the possibility of further testing (20%) after the endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration has decreased significantly. Finally, we got that the false-negative rate and percentages of malignancy were 17.81% and 83.91%, while 98% of participants did not recognize that there is a false-negative risk of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and more than 2/3 of participants did not know how much risk they might have for malignant lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

A high proportion of patients who received endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration could identify the indication for this procedure but remained unaware of possible outcomes, downstream events, especially the risk for false-negative and malignant lesions. It is necessary to improve the quality of dialogue between clinicians and patients, and the information about the risk of false-negative and malignancy may need to be emphasized in the informed consent process.

Myxoid Soft Tissue Tumors: A 20-Year Experience on Fine Needle Aspiration with Application of the Proposed WHO Reporting System for Soft Tissue Cytopathology

INTRODUCTION

Myxoid soft tissue tumors represent a heterogenous group of neoplasms. The study presented our experience on cytopathology of myxoid soft tissue tumors on fine needle aspiration (FNA) and aimed to apply the recently proposed WHO system for reporting soft tissue cytopathology.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a 20-year retrospective search of our archives to identify all FNAs performed on myxoid soft tissue lesions. All cases were reviewed, and the WHO reporting system was applied.

RESULTS

129 FNAs performed in 121 patients (62 males; 59 females) showed a prominent myxoid component, accounting for 2.4% of all soft tissue FNAs. The FNAs were performed on 111 (86.7%) primary tumors, 17 (13.2%) recurrent tumors, and one (0.8%) metastatic lesion. A spectrum of non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions including both benign and malignant neoplasms was identified. Overall, the most common tumors identified were myxoid liposarcoma (27.1%), intramuscular myxoma (15.5%), and myxofibrosarcoma (13.1%). The sensitivity and specificity of FNA regarding the nature of the lesion (benign vs. malignant) were 98% and 100%, respectively. When the WHO reporting system was applied, the frequency of the categories was as follows: benign (7.8%), atypical (34.1%), soft tissue neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (18.6%), suspicious for malignancy (3.1%), and malignant (36.4%). The risk of malignancy calculated in each category was as follows: benign (10%), atypical (31.8%), soft tissue neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (50%), suspicious for malignancy (100%), and malignant (100%).

CONCLUSION

A diverse group of non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions can show a prominent myxoid component on FNA. The WHO reporting system for soft tissue cytopathology is easily applicable and appears to correlate well with the malignant potential of myxoid tumors.

Role of Immunohistochemistry in Suspected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Prospective Study on Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsies

OBJECTIVES

Differential diagnosis between pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and benign mimickers can be very difficult on small histological samples, such as fine needle aspiration biopsies (FNAB). We aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of immunostaining for IMP3, Maspin, S100A4, S100P, TFF2, and TFF3 in FNAB pancreatic lesions.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 20 consecutive patients with suspected PDAC, collecting FNABs at our department between 2019 and 2021.

RESULTS

Three of the 20 enrolled patients resulted negative for all immunohistochemical markers, while all the others were positive for Maspin. All other immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers had sensitivity and accuracy of less than 100%. On the basis of the IHC, the preoperative diagnosis on FNAB was nonmalignant lesions in the IHC negative cases and PDAC in the others. All patients subsequently underwent surgery for the pancreatic solid mass demonstrated by imaging techniques. The concordance between the preoperative and postoperative diagnosis was 100%; all IHC negative samples were diagnosed on surgical specimens as chronic pancreatitis and Maspin-positive samples as PDAC.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that even in the presence of little histological material, such as FNAB, the use of Maspin alone is sufficient to discriminate between PDAC and nonmalignant pancreatic lesions, with 100% accuracy.