The -159C/T polymorphism in the CD14 gene and tuberculosis risk: a meta-analysis

Association between the IL-6 gene polymorphism and tuberculosis risk: a meta-analysis

Background

The gene polymorphism of interleukin-6 (IL-6) has been shown to be implicated in tuberculosis susceptibility in many studies, but with conflicting results. This study aimed to provide more accurate estimation of the relationship between IL-6 gene polymorphism and tuberculosis risk through a meta-analysis.

Method

A literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and other databases. Data were retrieved, and pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI were calculated. Statistical analyses were performed by using STATA 12.0.

Results

Twelve publications with 2635 cases and 3049 controls were included. The pooled analysis demonstrated significant evidence of association between IL-6 (-174G/C) and low risk of tuberculosis in dominant model (CC+GC vs GG: OR =0.693, 95% CI 0.581-0.826, p<0.001). Subgroup analysis got similar results for IL-6 (-174G/C) in Asians and Latinos, but the significance did not exist in Caucasians. IL-6 (-572C/G) polymorphism was also associated with low risk of tuberculosis in dominant model (CC+GC vs GG: OR =0.719, 95% CI 0.577-0.896, p=0.003). No publication bias was detected in either of the polymorphisms.

Conclusion

In summary, IL-6 -572 C/G polymorphism may be associated with a decreased risk of tuberculosis, and C allele is the protective factor against tuberculosis for IL-6 -174G/C among Asians and Latinos, but not in Caucasian population.

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in CD14 and Toll-like Receptor 4 Genes in Patients with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome

Introduction

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a complex disease having genetic, immunologic, and environmental components, and candidate genes on innate immunity have been hypothesized to be involved in its etiology. We examined the possible association of CD14 and toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) polymorphisms with PCOS.

Materials and methods

A total of 219 women with PCOS and 272 healthy women were recruited in the study. Their samples were genotyped for the polymorphism of CD14 and TLR4 genes.

Results

The distributions of genotypes of both polymorphisms were found to be significant in women with PCOS compared with controls. The distributions of alleles were also found to be predominant in PCOS compared with controls.

Conclusion

Polymorphisms in CD14-159C>T and TLR4-299A>G significantly increased susceptibility to PCOS. Further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to confirm these findings.

How to cite this article

Allauddin N, Rozati R. Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in CD14 and Toll-like Receptor 4 Genes in Patients with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome. J South Asian Feder Obst Gynae 2017;9(4):304-307.

The -159C/T polymorphism in the CD14 gene and cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Purpose

The -159C/T polymorphism in the cluster of differentiation (CD)14 gene has been extensively studied for an association with cancer; however, results from replication studies have been inconclusive. The aim of this study was to perform a comprehensive assessment of the possible association between the -159C/T polymorphism in the CD14 gene and cancer risk, by meta-analysis.

Methods

We searched in PubMed, Embase, and other databases, covering all case-control studies on the possible association between CD14 -159C/T gene polymorphism and cancer risk. Data were extracted and statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.0 and STATA 12.0 software.

Results

A total of 12 case-control studies met our inclusion criteria, including 2,498 cases and 2,696 controls. The combined analysis indicated that the CD14 -159C/T gene polymorphism didn’t confer risk for cancer – the recessive model (TT versus (vs) CT + CC), showed odds ratio (OR) =1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) =0.82–1.23 (P=0.94), while the dominant model (TT + TC vs CC) showed OR =0.81, 95% CI =0.66–1.00 (P=0.05). A subgroup analysis by ethnicity showed that the cancer risk associated with CD14 -159C/T gene polymorphism was significantly decreased among Caucasians for the TC + TT vs CC comparison (OR =0.83, 95% CI =0.70–0.98 [P=0.03]). The subgroup analysis by cancer type suggested that the CD14 -159C/T gene polymorphism was not associated with gastric cancer risk.

Conclusion

The evidence from the present meta-analysis did not support the CD14 -159C/T gene polymorphism as a genetic risk factor for cancer. Further studies on different cancer types and ethnicities are needed to validate our findings.