1
|
Youssef SH, Ganesan R, Amirmostofian M, Kim S, Polara R, Afinjuomo F, Song Y, Chereda B, Singhal N, Robinson N, Garg S. Printing a cure: A tailored solution for localized drug delivery in liver cancer treatment. Int J Pharm 2024; 651:123790. [PMID: 38190951 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.123790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
Adjuvant chemotherapy is highly recommended for liver cancer to enhance survival rates due to its tendency to recur frequently. Localized drug-eluting implants have gained traction as an alternative to overcome the limitations of systemic chemotherapy. This work describes the development of biodegradable 3D printed (3DP) bilayer films loaded with 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and cisplatin (Cis) with different infill percentages where the 5FU layers were 40%, 30%, and 30% and Cis layers were 10%, 15%, and 10% for films A, B, and C, respectively. The relevant characterization tests were performed, and the drug content of films was 0.68, 0.50, and 0.50 mg of 5FU and 0.39, 0.80, and 0.34 mg of Cis for films A, B, and C, respectively. Cis release was affected by the alterations to the film design, where films A, B, and C showed complete release at 12, 14, and 23 days, respectively. However, 5FU was released over 24 h for all films. The films were stable for up to two weeks after storage at 25 °C/65% relative humidity and four weeks at 4 °C where drug content, tensile strength, FTIR, and thermal analysis results demonstrated negligible alterations. The cytotoxicity of the films was assessed by MTS assays using HepG2 cell lines demonstrating up to 81% reduction in cell viability compared to blank films. Moreover, apoptosis was confirmed by Western Blots and the determination of mitochondrial cell potential, highlighting the potential of these films as a promising approach in adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Souha H Youssef
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Raja Ganesan
- Centre for Cancer Biology, University of South Australia and SA Pathology, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | | | - Sangseo Kim
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Ruhi Polara
- Centre for Cancer Biology, University of South Australia and SA Pathology, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Franklin Afinjuomo
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Yunmei Song
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Bradley Chereda
- Centre for Cancer Biology, University of South Australia and SA Pathology, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Nimit Singhal
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Dept of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Nirmal Robinson
- Centre for Cancer Biology, University of South Australia and SA Pathology, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Discipline of Medicine and the Faculty of Health Science, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Sanjay Garg
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yang Y, Yang Z, Lyu Z, Wang J, Wu D, Li Y. Predicting Surgical Benefit for Primary Tumor Resection in Patients with Stage IV Colorectal Cancer.. [DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2031087/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
There exists continuous controversy regarding the effect of primary tumor resection (PTR) for stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Little is known about how to predict the patients’ survival benefit from PTR. This study aimed to develop a tool for surgical benefit prediction.
Methods
Stage IV CRC patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database were included. After propensity score matching, patients receiving PTR that survived longer than the median cancer-specific survival (CSS) time of those who did not undergo PTR were considered to benefit from surgery. Logistic regression analysis identified prognostic factors influencing the surgical benefit, based on which a nomogram was constructed. A user-friendly webserver was then built for convenient clinical use. The predictive model was assessed using Harrell’s concordance index, calibration plot, receiver operative curve and decision curve analysis.
Results
The median CSS of the PTR group was 23 months, which was significantly longer than the non-PTR group (12 months, P < 0.001). In the PTR group, 32.9% of patients did not benefit from surgery. Logistic regression analysis identified age, tumor location, CEA level, histological grade, number of distant metastasis, and preoperative chemotherapy independently associated with surgical benefit. The established prognostic nomogram demonstrated satisfactory performance.
Conclusion
PTR was associated with prolonged survival in stage IV CRC. The proposed nomogram could be used as a risk-to-benefit assessment evidenced-based platform for selecting appropriate patients to undergo PTR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Deqing Wu
- Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
| | - Yong Li
- Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Qiao Y, Qiao Y, Li H, Fu J, You S. Survival benefit of primary and metastatic tumor resection for colon cancer with liver metastases: A population based, propensity score-matched study. Front Surg 2022; 9:959826. [PMID: 36111222 PMCID: PMC9468248 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.959826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Colon cancer remains one of the most common malignancies and we aimed to evaluate whether surgery has an effect on the survival of metastatic colon patients. Methods We analyzed 7,583 metastatic colon patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, between January 2010 and December 2015. Using Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier curves, the overall survival rate (OS) and cancer-specific survival rate and End Results (SEER) registry (CSS) months (m) were evaluated with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to adjust for potential baseline confounding of all comparison groups. Results In general, receiving both primary and metastatic tumor resection (PMTR) remarkably improved OS and CSS compared with only primary tumor resection (PTR) after PS matching (PSM) (P < 0.05), with a significantly improved OS (HR = 0.74, 95%CI = 0.69–0.80) and CSS (HR = 0.71, 95%CI = 0.66–0.76) in all stage M1 colon patients. The stratification analysis indicated a significant difference between OS and CSS in M1a and M1b stages. After PSM, PMTR was found to be associated with remarkably improved OS and CSS for patients with liver metastases but not associated with OS and CSS of patients with lung metastases in both M1a and M1b stage. Conclusions The results from this large SEER cohort supported PMTR might improve the survival of colon patients with liver metastases on the basis of chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunfeng Qiao
- First Clinical Medical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Yunfeng Qiao
- Cancer Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macau, China
| | - Huijun Li
- Department of Imaging Medicine, Taikang Tongji (Wuhan) Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Jinge Fu
- Department of Anorectal Surgery, Weishi Central Hospital, Kaifeng, China
| | - Shuping You
- Department of Anus and Bowel Surgery, Jingmen No. 2 People's Hospital, Jingmen, China
- Correspondence: Shuping You
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Di Martino M, Primavesi F, Syn N, Dorcaratto D, de la Hoz Rodríguez Á, Dupré A, Piardi T, Rhaiem R, Blanco Fernández G, de Armas Conde N, Rodríguez Sanjuán JC, Fernández Santiago R, Fernández-Moreno MC, Ferret G, López Ben S, Suárez Muñoz MÁ, Perez-Alonso AJ, Koh YX, Jones R, Martín-Pérez E. Long-Term Outcomes of Perioperative Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: An International Multicentre Propensity-Score Matched Analysis with Stratification by Contemporary Risk-Scoring. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:6829-6842. [PMID: 35849284 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12027-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is still debate regarding the principal role and ideal timing of perioperative chemotherapy (CTx) for patients with upfront resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This study assesses long-term oncological outcomes in patients receiving neoadjuvant CTx only versus those receiving neoadjuvant combined with adjuvant therapy (perioperative CTx). METHODS International multicentre retrospective analysis of patients with CRLM undergoing liver resection between 2010 and 2015. Characteristics and outcomes were compared before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Primary endpoints were long-term oncological outcomes, such as recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Furthermore, stratification by the tumour burden score (TBS) was applied. RESULTS Of 967 patients undergoing hepatectomy, 252 were analysed, with a median follow-up of 45 months. The unmatched comparison revealed a bias towards patients with neoadjuvant CTx presenting with more high-risk patients (p = 0.045) and experiencing increased postoperative complications ≥Clavien-Dindo III (20.9% vs. 8%, p = 0.003). Multivariable analysis showed that perioperative CTx was associated with significantly improved RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.579, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.420-0.800, p = 0.001) and OS (HR 0.579, 95% CI 0.403-0.834, p = 0.003). After PSM (n = 180 patients), the two groups were comparable regarding baseline characteristics. The perioperative CTx group presented with a significantly prolonged RFS (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.37-0.76, p = 0.007) and OS (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.87, p = 0.010) in both low and high TBS patients. CONCLUSIONS When patients after resection of CRLM are able to tolerate additional postoperative CTx, a perioperative strategy demonstrates increased RFS and OS in comparison with neoadjuvant CTx only in both low and high-risk situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Di Martino
- HPB Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain.
| | - Florian Primavesi
- Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.,Salzkammergutklinikum Vöcklabruck, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| | - Nicholas Syn
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Dimitri Dorcaratto
- Department of Surgery, Liver, Biliary, and Pancreatic Unit, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Hospital Clínico University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ángela de la Hoz Rodríguez
- HPB Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain
| | - Aurélien Dupré
- Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Tullio Piardi
- Department of HBP and Digestive Oncological Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France.,HPB Unit, Department of Surgery, Simone Veil Hospital, Troyes, France
| | - Rami Rhaiem
- Department of HBP and Digestive Oncological Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - Gerardo Blanco Fernández
- Department of HBP and Liver Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Badajoz. INUBE (Instituto Universitario de Investigación Biosanitaria de Extremadura). University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
| | - Noelia de Armas Conde
- Department of HBP and Liver Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Badajoz. INUBE (Instituto Universitario de Investigación Biosanitaria de Extremadura). University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
| | | | | | - María-Carmen Fernández-Moreno
- Department of Surgery, Liver, Biliary, and Pancreatic Unit, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Hospital Clínico University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Georgina Ferret
- Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | | | | | - Alejandro J Perez-Alonso
- Unidad de Cirugia HBP y Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
| | - Ye-Xin Koh
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Robert Jones
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Elena Martín-Pérez
- HPB Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
A Prehepatectomy Circulating Exosomal microRNA Signature Predicts the Prognosis and Adjuvant Chemotherapeutic Benefits in Colorectal Liver Metastasis. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13174258. [PMID: 34503068 PMCID: PMC8428239 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13174258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Revised: 08/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Exosomal miRNAs are associated with colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM)-related biological behavior and prognosis. However, an exosomal miRNA signature predicting postoperative survival and the value of adjuvant chemotherapy for CRLM remains elusive. Using miRNA sequencing and the LASSO model, we constructed an miRNA signature comprising four exosomes. The signature showed a good predictive performance for patient outcome and the advantage of adjuvant chemotherapy after hepatectomy in two institutions’ training and validation cohorts. In addition, we found that the four miRNAs could target signaling molecules playing crucial roles in colorectal cancer metastasis, vesicle-related processing, and T cell activation. Furthermore, the exosomal miRNA score also increased with the decreasing Immunoscore. We believe that our signature can predict the prognosis and guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions after liver metastasectomy in CRLM patients, further improving the predictive performance of the current CRLM predictive model system. Abstract Background: The clinical risk score (CRS) for prediction and treatment decision in colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is important, but imprecise. Exosomal miRNAs play critical roles in CRLM-related biological behavior. However, an exosomal miRNA score system for predicting posthepatectomy survival and the adjuvant chemotherapy benefit of CRLM remains elusive. Methods: miRNA sequencing was used to identify differentially expressed miRNAs, and the LASSO model was used to select miRNAs to construct the intent model. The predictive performance of the model was evaluated by the area under the ROC curve (AUC) in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts. Results: Sixteen differentially expressed exosomal miRNAs were identified, and four miRNAs were selected for model construction. Our model performed well in predicting prognosis with five-year AUCs of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.59–0.81), 0.70 (0.61–0.81), and 0.72 (057–0.86) in the training, internal, and external validation cohorts, respectively. miRNA classifier high-risk patients had better survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy regardless of CRS. All four miRNAs target signaling molecules play crucial roles in colorectal cancer metastasis, vesicle-related processing, and T cell activation. It also negatively correlated with the liver metastasis Immunoscore. Conclusion: We developed a circulating exosomal miRNA signature that can predict the prognosis and guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions after hepatectomy in CRLM.
Collapse
|
6
|
Mowbray NG, Chin C, Duncan P, O'Reilly D, Kaposztas Z, Junnarkar S, Kumar N. How successful is liver resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases in patients over 75 years old? Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2021; 25:18-24. [PMID: 33649250 PMCID: PMC7952666 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.2021.25.1.18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 08/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims As populations age, an increased incidence of colorectal cancer will generate an increase in colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM). In order to guide treatment decisions, this study aimed to identify the contemporary complication rates of elderly patients undergoing liver resection for CRLM in a, centralised, UK centre. Methods All patients undergoing operative procedures for CRLM between January 2013 and January 2019 were included. Patient, tumour and operative data were analysed, including the prognostic marker; tumour burden score. Results 339 operations were performed on 289 consecutive patients with CRLM (272 patients <75 years old, 67 patients ≥75 years old). Median age was 66 years (range 20-93). There was no difference in major complication rates between the two age cohorts (6.65 vs. 6.0%, p=0.847) or operative mortality (1.1% vs. 1.4%, p=0.794). Younger patients had higher R1 resection rates (20.4% vs. 4.5%, p=0.002) and post-operative chemotherapy rates (60.3% vs. 35.8%, p< 0.001). The 1, 3 and 5-year OS was 90.2%, 70.5% and 52.3% respectively, median 70 months, with no difference between age cohorts (p=0.772). Tumour Burden score and operation type were independent predictors of overall survival. Conclusions Liver resection for CRLM in patients 75 years and older is feasible, safe and confers a similar 5-year survival rate to younger patients. The current outcomes from surgery are better than historical datasets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carven Chin
- Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| | - Patricia Duncan
- Cardiff Liver Unit, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - David O'Reilly
- Cardiff Liver Unit, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Zsolt Kaposztas
- Department of Surgery, Moritz Kaposi Teaching General Hospital, Kaposvár, Hungary
| | | | - Nagappan Kumar
- Cardiff Liver Unit, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chen L, Syn NL, Goh BKP, Cheow PC, Raj P, Koh Y, Chung A, Lee SY, Ooi LL, Chan CY, Teo JY. Impact of multidisciplinary tumour boards (MTB) on the clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of resected colorectal liver metastases across time. World J Surg Oncol 2020; 18:237. [PMID: 32883292 PMCID: PMC7650267 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-01984-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) has been established as the standard of care. This study aims to compare the change in clinicopathological characteristics of patients who underwent curative resection of CLM across two time periods-2000 to 2010 (P1) and 2011 to 2016 (P2) and evaluate the prognostic impact of these characteristics on survival outcomes. METHODS Patients who undergo liver resection for CLM at Singapore General Hospital from January 2000 to December 2016 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS There were 183/318 (57.5%) patients and 135/318 (42.5%) patients in P1 and P2, respectively. There was a lower proportion of patients who had nodal metastases from primary colorectal cancer and clinical risk score (CRS) less than 3 in P2 when compared to P1. There was no difference in survival between both time periods. Independent predictors of survival for the cohort were CEA levels ≥ 200 ng/ml, primary tumour grade and lymph nodal status. Independent predictors of poor survival in P1 were poorly differentiated colorectal cancer and nodal metastases while in P2, independent predictors of poor survival were multiple liver metastases and nodal metastases. CONCLUSION Nodal metastases from primary colorectal cancer are an independent predictor of poor survival across time for resectable CLM. Although there is no difference in survival between the two time periods, patients with multiple liver metastases should be carefully considered prior to surgery as it is also an independent predictor of overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lionel Chen
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Rd, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
| | - Nicholas L Syn
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Rd, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Rd, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Peng Chung Cheow
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Rd, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Prema Raj
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Rd, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yexin Koh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Rd, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Alexander Chung
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Rd, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ser Yee Lee
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Rd, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - London Lucien Ooi
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Rd, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chung Yip Chan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Rd, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jin Yao Teo
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Rd, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kye BH, Lee SH, Jeong WK, Yu CS, Park IJ, Kim HR, Kim J, Lee IK, Park KJ, Choi HJ, Kim HY, Baek JH, Lee YS. Which strategy is better for resectable synchronous liver metastasis from colorectal cancer, simultaneous surgery, or staged surgery? Multicenter retrospective analysis. Ann Surg Treat Res 2019; 97:184-193. [PMID: 31620392 PMCID: PMC6779956 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2019.97.4.184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2019] [Revised: 08/14/2019] [Accepted: 09/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The optimal treatment for synchronous liver metastasis (LM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) depends on various factors. The present study was intended to investigate the oncologic outcome according to the time of resection of metastatic lesions. Methods Data from patients who underwent treatment with curative intent for primary CRC and synchronous LM between 2004 and 2009 from 9 university hospitals in Korea were collected retrospectively. One hundred forty-three patients underwent simultaneous resection for primary CRC and synchronous LM (simultaneous surgery group), and 65 patients were treated by 2-stage operation (staged surgery group). Results The mean follow-up length was 41.2 ± 24.6 months. In the extent of resection for hepatic metastasis, major hepatectomy was more frequently performed in staged surgery group (33.8% vs. 8.4%, P < 0.001). The rate of severe complications of Clavien-Dindo classification grade III or more was not significantly different between the 2 groups. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 85.0% in staged surgery group and 69.4% in simultaneous surgery group (P = 0.013), and the 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was 46.4% in staged surgery group and 30.2% in simultaneous surgery group (P = 0.143). In subgroup analysis based on the location of primary CRC, the benefit of staged surgery for OS and RFS was clearly shown in rectal cancer (P = 0.021 and P = 0.015). Conclusion Based on our results, staged surgery with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be considered for resectable synchronous LM from CRC, especially in rectal cancer, as a safe and fairly promising option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bong-Hyeon Kye
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Suk-Hwan Lee
- Department of Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woon Kyung Jeong
- Department of Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Korea
| | - Chang Sik Yu
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - In Ja Park
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyeong Rok Kim
- Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital and Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Jin Kim
- Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - In Kyu Lee
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ki-Jea Park
- Department of Surgery, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Hong-Jo Choi
- Department of Surgery, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Ho Young Kim
- Department of Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea
| | - Jeong-Heum Baek
- Department of Surgery, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Yoon-Suk Lee
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cao G, Zhou W, Chen E, Wang F, Chen L, Chen M, Zhao W, Xu J, Zhang W, Zhang G, Huang X, Song Z. A novel scoring system predicting survival benefits of palliative primary tumor resection for patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study protocol. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e17178. [PMID: 31517873 PMCID: PMC6750347 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000017178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The role of palliative primary tumor resection (PPTR) in improving survival in patients with synchronous unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is controversial. In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether our novel scoring system could predict survival benefits of PPTR in mCRC patients.In this retrospective cohort study consecutive patients with synchronous mCRC and unresectable metastases admitted to Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital between January 2005 and December 2013 were identified. A scoring system was established by the serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Patients with scores of 0, 1-2, or 3-4 were considered as being in the low, intermediate, and high score group, respectively. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS).A total of 138 eligible patients were included in the analysis, of whom 103 patients had undergone PPTR and 35 had not. The median OS of the PPTR group was better than that of the Non-PPTR group, with 26.2 and 18.9 months, respectively (P < .01). However, the subgroup of PPTR with a high score (3-4) showed no OS benefit (13.3 months) compared with that of the Non-PPTR group (18.9 months, P = .11). The subgroup of PPTR with a low score (52.1 months) or intermediate score (26.2 months) had better OS than that of the Non-PPTR group (P < .001, P = .017, respectively).A novel scoring system composed of CEA, CA19-9, NLR, and LDH values is a feasible method to evaluate whether mCRC patients would benefit from PPTR. It might guide clinical decision making in selecting patients with unresectable mCRC for primary tumor resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaoyang Cao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University
- Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Biological Treatment, Hangzhou
| | - Wei Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University
- Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Biological Treatment, Hangzhou
| | - Engeng Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University
- Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Biological Treatment, Hangzhou
| | - Fei Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University
- Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Biological Treatment, Hangzhou
| | - Li Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University
- Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Biological Treatment, Hangzhou
| | - Min Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University
- Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Biological Treatment, Hangzhou
| | - Wei Zhao
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Lanxi Hospital, China
| | - Jianbin Xu
- Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Biological Treatment, Hangzhou
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University
- Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Biological Treatment, Hangzhou
| | - Guolin Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University
- Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Biological Treatment, Hangzhou
| | - Xuefeng Huang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University
- Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Biological Treatment, Hangzhou
| | - Zhangfa Song
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University
- Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Biological Treatment, Hangzhou
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Saad AM, Abdel-Rahman O. Initial systemic chemotherapeutic and targeted therapy strategies for the treatment of colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2019; 20:1767-1775. [PMID: 31314604 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1642324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: The liver is the most common metastatic site in colorectal cancer with more than half the patients developing a liver metastasis either at the time of their diagnosis (synchronous) or later (metachronous). Surgical resection remains the principal curative approach that offers significant survival improvements. However, upfront surgery is only possible in about 10-20% of patients at the time of diagnosis, making the consideration of other treatment modalities essential. Areas covered: In this review, the authors provide an overview of the standard approaches for the initial management of patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastases. They then provide an up-to-date discussion of first-line systemic chemotherapy/targeted therapy options in the contexts of initially resectable and unresectable disease and review toxicities and complications following these options. Expert opinion: Advances in chemotherapeutic agents and biological targeted therapies have improved the prognosis of colorectal cancer with liver metastases. However, there is still no 'single best approach', making further trials necessary to provide more evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Omar Abdel-Rahman
- Clinical Oncology Department, Ain Shams University , Cairo , Egypt.,Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Cross Cancer Institute , Edmonton , Alberta , Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Matsuoka H, Morise Z, Tanaka C, Hayashi T, Ikeda Y, Maeda K, Masumori K, Koide Y, Katsuno H, Tanahashi Y, Nakajima S, Hanai T, Kato Y, Sugioka A, Uyama I. Repeat hepatectomy with systemic chemotherapy might improve survival of recurrent liver metastasis from colorectal cancer-a retrospective observational study. World J Surg Oncol 2019; 17:33. [PMID: 30770753 PMCID: PMC6377761 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-019-1575-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 02/08/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although hepatectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) prolongs survival in up to 40% of people, recurrence rates approach 70%. We used a multidisciplinary approach to treat recurrent liver metastases, including chemotherapy, surgery, and palliative care. On the other hand, development of chemotherapeutic agents is remarkable and improves long-term survival. However, whether chemotherapy and repeat hepatectomy combination therapy improve survival or not is still unclear. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of repeat hepatectomy with systemic chemotherapy for mCRC. METHODS Following Institutional Review Board approval, we reviewed the records of all patients who underwent hepatectomy for mCRC between 1974 and 2015 at Fujita Health University Hospital. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate overall survival from the first and last hepatectomy in multi hepatectomy cases after 2005 and compared outcomes between groups using the log-rank test. RESULTS A total of 426 liver resections were performed for mCRC; of these, 236 cases were performed after 2005 (late group). In 118 (50%) cases, the site of recurrence was the liver, 59 (50%) underwent repeat hepatectomy, and 14 cases had ≥ 2 repeat hepatectomies. Overall survival (OS) before and after 2005 was 42.2 and 64.1 months, respectively, with the late group having better OS compared to the early (1974-2004) group. OS for single hepatectomy cases was 83.2 months, for two hepatectomies was 42.9 months, and for three hepatectomies was 35.3 months. In total, 59 patients did not undergo surgery after recurrence with an OS of 28.7 months. Mortality of the second and third repeat hepatectomy was 1.7% and 15.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION Repeat hepatectomy with systemic chemotherapy for mCRC is feasible and might achieve improved survival in carefully selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi Matsuoka
- Department of Surgery Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake City, Aichi 470-1192 Japan
| | - Zenichi Morise
- Department of Surgery Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake City, Aichi 470-1192 Japan
| | - Chihiro Tanaka
- College of Pharmacy, Kinjo Gakuin University, 2-1723 Oomori Moriyama, Nagoya City, Aichi 463-8521 Japan
| | - Takahiro Hayashi
- College of Pharmacy, Kinjo Gakuin University, 2-1723 Oomori Moriyama, Nagoya City, Aichi 463-8521 Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Ikeda
- College of Pharmacy, Kinjo Gakuin University, 2-1723 Oomori Moriyama, Nagoya City, Aichi 463-8521 Japan
| | - Koutarou Maeda
- Fujita Health University Hospital International Medical Center, 1-98 Dengakugakubo Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake city, Aichi 470-1192 Japan
| | - Koji Masumori
- Department of Surgery Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake City, Aichi 470-1192 Japan
| | - Yoshikazu Koide
- Department of Surgery Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake City, Aichi 470-1192 Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Katsuno
- Department of Surgery Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake City, Aichi 470-1192 Japan
| | - Yoshinao Tanahashi
- Department of Surgery Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake City, Aichi 470-1192 Japan
| | - Sanae Nakajima
- Department of Surgery Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake City, Aichi 470-1192 Japan
| | - Tsunekazu Hanai
- Department of Surgery Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake City, Aichi 470-1192 Japan
| | - Yutaro Kato
- Department of Surgery Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake City, Aichi 470-1192 Japan
| | - Atsushi Sugioka
- Department of Surgery Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake City, Aichi 470-1192 Japan
| | - Ichiro Uyama
- Department of Surgery Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake City, Aichi 470-1192 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mitchell D, Puckett Y, Nguyen QN. Literature Review of Current Management of Colorectal Liver Metastasis. Cureus 2019; 11:e3940. [PMID: 30937238 PMCID: PMC6433446 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.3940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States, and metastasis to the liver is a frequent sequela. Currently, surgical resection is the best option for curative treatment and/or long-term survival after colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM), but unfortunately, not all patients are surgical candidates. Alternative and adjunct therapies commonly used in the treatment of CRLM include chemotherapy, biologic therapy, radio-embolization, and radiofrequency ablation. The aim of this review was to report the various treatment modalities and outcomes currently used in the treatment of CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Mitchell
- Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, USA
| | - Yana Puckett
- Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, USA
| | - Quang N Nguyen
- Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Xu F, Tang B, Jin TQ, Dai CL. Current status of surgical treatment of colorectal liver metastases. World J Clin Cases 2018; 6:716-734. [PMID: 30510936 PMCID: PMC6264988 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i14.716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2018] [Revised: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 10/22/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver metastasis (LM) is one of the major causes of death in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Approximately 60% of CRC patients develop LM during the course of their illness. About 85% of these patients have unresectable disease at the time of presentation. Surgical resection is currently the only curative treatment for patients with colorectal LM (CRLM). In recent years, with the help of modern multimodality therapy including systemic chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery, the outcomes of CRLM treatment have significantly improved. This article summarizes the current status of surgical treatment of CRLM including evaluation of resectability, treatment for resectable LM, conversion therapy and liver transplantation for unresectable cases, liver resection for recurrent CRLM and elderly patients, and surgery for concomitant hepatic and extra-hepatic metastatic disease (EHMD). We believe that with the help of modern multimodality therapy, an aggressive oncosurgical approach should be implemented as it has the possibility of achieving a cure, even when EHMD is present in patients with CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Splenic Surgery, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Bin Tang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Splenic Surgery, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Tian-Qiang Jin
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Splenic Surgery, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Chao-Liu Dai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Splenic Surgery, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pan Z, Peng J, Lin J, Chen G, Wu X, Lu Z, Deng Y, Zhao Y, Sui Q, Wan D. Is there a survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with liver oligometastases from colorectal cancer after curative resection? Cancer Commun (Lond) 2018; 38:29. [PMID: 29843800 PMCID: PMC5993126 DOI: 10.1186/s40880-018-0298-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2017] [Accepted: 03/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although colorectal oligometastases to the liver can potentially be cured with aggressive local ablation, the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for such metastasis remains unclear. The present study explored the effects of ACT on patients with colorectal liver oligometastases (CLO) after curative resections and aimed to identify patients who could benefit from ACT. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 264 eligible patients with CLO who underwent curative resection between September 1999 and June 2015. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test; prognostic factors were a by Cox regression modeling. Results Among 264 patients, 200 (75.8%) patients received ACT and 64 (24.2%) did not receive ACT. These two groups did not significantly differ in clinicopathologic characteristics, and had comparable 3-year OS and RFS rates (RFS: 42.1% vs. 45.7%, P = 0.588; OS: 69.7% vs. 62.7%, P = 0.446) over a median follow-up duration of 35.5 months, irrespective of preoperative chemotherapy. ACT markedly improved 3-year OS in high-risk patients with Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center clinical risk scores (MSKCC-CRS) of 3–5 (68.2% vs. 33.8%, P = 0.015), but presented no additional benefit in patients with MSKCC-CRS of 0–2 (72.2% vs. 78.6%, P = 0.834). In multivariate analysis, ACT was independently associated with improved OS in patients with MSKCC-CRS of 3–5. Conclusions ACT might offer a prognostic benefit in high-risk patients with CLOs after curative liver resection, but not in low-risk patients. Therefore, patients’ risk status should be determined before ACT administration to optimize postoperative therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhizhong Pan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Jianhong Peng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Junzhong Lin
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Gong Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Xiaojun Wu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Zhenhai Lu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Yuxiang Deng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Yujie Zhao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Qiaoqi Sui
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Desen Wan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Current Trends on the Treatment Sequence for Colorectal Cancer with Liver Metastases. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-018-0402-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
16
|
Zhang RX, Ma WJ, Gu YT, Zhang TQ, Huang ZM, Lu ZH, Gu YK. Primary tumor location as a predictor of the benefit of palliative resection for colorectal cancer with unresectable metastasis. World J Surg Oncol 2017; 15:138. [PMID: 28750680 PMCID: PMC5530936 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-017-1198-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2016] [Accepted: 07/03/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background It is still under debate that whether stage IV colorectal cancer patients with unresectable metastasis can benefit from primary tumor resection, especially for asymptomatic colorectal cancer patients. Retrospective studies have shown controversial results concerning the benefit from surgery. This retrospective study aims to evaluate whether the site of primary tumor is a predictor of palliative resection in asymptomatic stage IV colorectal cancer patients. Methods One hundred ninety-four patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer were selected from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center Database in the period between January 2007 and December 2013. All information was carefully reviewed and collected, including the treatment, age, sex, carcinoembryonic antigen, site of tumor, histology, cancer antigen 199, number of liver metastases, and largest diameter of liver metastasis. The univariate and multivariate analyses were used to detect the relationship between primary tumor resection and overall survival of unresectable stage IV colorectal cancer patients. Results One hundred twenty-five received palliative resection, and 69 received only chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis indicated that primary tumor site was one of the independent factors (RR 0.569, P = 0.007) that influenced overall survival. For left-side colon cancer patients, primary tumor resection prolonged the median overall survival time for 8 months (palliative resection vs. no palliative resection: 22 vs. 14 months, P = 0.009); however, for right-side colon cancer patients, palliative resection showed no benefit (12 vs. 10 months, P = 0.910). Conclusions This study showed that left-side colon cancer patients might benefit from the primary tumor resection in terms of overall survival. This result should be further explored in a prospective study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rong-Xin Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wen-Juan Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Yu-Ting Gu
- Medical Record Department of The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Tian-Qi Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Microinvasive Interventional Department, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhi-Mei Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Microinvasive Interventional Department, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhen-Hai Lu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. .,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. .,Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Yang-Kui Gu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. .,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. .,Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China. .,Microinvasive Interventional Department, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|