The Impact of Microsatellite Instability Status and Sidedness of the Primary Tumor on the Effect of Cetuximab-Containing Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Laterality influence on gene expression of DNA damage repair in colorectal cancer

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is the third most common malignancy worldwide, and second in number of deaths in the world. The molecular pathogenesis of CRC is heterogeneous and can affect several genes. Moreover, genomic instability is recognized as an important part of CRC carcinogenesis and is tightly connected to DNA damage response. DNA damage repair (DDR) pathways are intrinsically associated with cancer development and establishment. Traditionally, CRC is considered as one coherent disease, however, new evidence shows that left and right-sided CRC present differences observed in clinical settings, as well as in pre-clinical studies. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the impact of DDR transcriptional profiles on survival in different sublocations of the colon and rectum using Cox regression, survival analysis and differential gene expression. Right side colon (RSC) has DDR genes' expression associated only with higher risk of death, while left side colon (LSC) and Rectum have most genes' expression associated with lower risk. The pattern is the same with survival analysis. All significant DDR genes had lower expression associated with better survival in RSC, as opposed to LSC and Rectum. Our results demonstrate that RSC is distinctively different from LSC and Rectum. LSC and Rectum have similar DDR expression profiles.

The effects of chemotherapy, primary tumor location and histological subtype on the survival of stage III colon cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

Colon cancer (CC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide and has a poor prognosis. Surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard treatment strategy for stage III CC patients. Primary tumor location (PTL) is an important factor for the long-term survival of CC. However, the difference in the prognosis between the histological subtypes of mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) and nonspecific adenocarcinoma (AC) in stage III CC patients is unclear. The correlation of chemotherapy, PTL and histological subtype with the overall survival (OS) of stage III CC patients has not yet been explored.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with stage III CC from 2010 to 2016 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were retrieved. The clinicopathological features and OS were analyzed according to the chemotherapy, PTL and histological subtype.

RESULTS

A total of 28,765 eligible stage III CC patients were enrolled in this study. The results showed that chemotherapy, left-sided CC (LCC) and AC were favorable prognostic factors for OS. Right-sided CC (RCC) had worse OS than LCC regardless of chemotherapy. MAC had worse OS than AC in the patients with chemotherapy, but the survival benefits disappeared in the patients without chemotherapy. Additionally, in LCC, MAC had worse OS than AC regardless of chemotherapy. However, in RCC, MAC had worse OS than AC in patients with chemotherapy but had similar OS to AC in patients without chemotherapy. In the AC group, RCC had worse OS than LCC regardless of chemotherapy. In the MAC group, RCC had comparable OS to LCC regardless of chemotherapy. Four subgroups, i.e., RCC/MAC, RCC/AC, LCC/MAC and LCC/AC, all showed benefits from chemotherapy. Among them, LCC/AC had the best OS, and RCC/MAC had the worst OS compared with the other three subgroups.

CONCLUSION

The prognosis of MAC is worse than that of AC in stage III CC. LCC/AC has the best OS, while RCC/MAC has the worst OS but still benefits from chemotherapy. The impact of chemotherapy on survival is greater than that of histological subtype, but the impact of histological subtype on survival is similar to that of PTL.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs): Novel potential therapeutic targets in colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common malignant tumor and one of the most lethal malignant tumors in the world. Despite treatment with a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, and/or systemic treatment, including chemotherapy and targeted therapy, the prognosis of patients with advanced CRC remains poor. Therefore, there is an urgent need to explore novel therapeutic strategies and targets for the treatment of CRC. MicroRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) are a class of short noncoding RNAs (approximately 22 nucleotides) involved in posttranscriptional gene expression regulation. The dysregulation of its expression is recognized as a key regulator related to the development, progression and metastasis of CRC. In recent years, a number of miRNAs have been identified as regulators of drug resistance in CRC, and some have gained attention as potential targets to overcome the drug resistance of CRC. In this review, we introduce the miRNAs and the diverse mechanisms of miRNAs in CRC and summarize the potential targeted therapies of CRC based on the miRNAs.

Immune signature as a potential marker for predicting response to immunotherapy in obesity-associated colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIM

It remains unclear whether immunotherapy, which is not generally considered for microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC), can be used to effectively treat select CRC patients. We investigated the feasibility of obesity-associated MSS CRC patients for immunotherapy based on genomic alterations.

METHODS

We evaluated differences in genomic alteration types and immune signatures between obese and non-obese patients with MSS CRC. We performed genomic analyses using 434 CRC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Patients with MSS CRC were stratified into subgroups based on their BMI and numbers of nonsynonymous single nucleotide variants (nsSNVs) and frameshift insertions and deletions (fs INDELs) using machine learning.

RESULTS

The obese subgroup showed higher incidences of single nucleotide variants (SNV) and insertions and deletions (INDELs) in comparison with healthy weight patients with MSS CRC. The subgroup, who had higher numbers of nsSNVs and fs INDLEs, exhibited increased immune signatures, increased number of SNV-derived neoantigens, and had up-regulated two immune checkpoint genes in comparison with healthy weight patients with MSS CRC, reflecting interactions between the cancer genome and immune system.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that immunotherapy may be suitable for some obesity-associated CRC patients.

Microsatellite instability and chemosensitivity in solid tumours

The use of biomarkers that influence a targeted choice in cancer treatments is the future of medical oncology. Within this scenario, in recent years, an important role has been played by knowledge of microsatellite instability (MSI), a molecular fingerprint that identifies defects in the mismatch repair system. This knowledge has changed clinical practice in the adjuvant setting of colon cancer, and its role in the neoadjuvant setting in gastric tumours is becoming increasingly interesting, as well as in endometrial cancers in both early and advanced diseases. Furthermore, it has undoubtedly conditioned the first lines of treatment in the metastatic setting in different types of cancers. The incidence of MSI is different in different cancer types, as well as in early cancers versus metastatic disease. Knowing the incidence of MSI in the various histologies can provide insight into the potential use of this biomarker considering its prognostic value, especially in the early stages, and its predictive role with respect to treatment response. In particular, MSI can guide the choice of chemotherapy treatments in the adjuvant setting of colon and perioperative setting in gastric tumours, which could lead to immunotherapy treatments in these patients in both the early stages of the disease and the metastatic setting where the response to immunotherapy drugs in diseases with MSI is now well established. In this review, we focus on colon, gastric and endometrial cancers, and we briefly discuss other cancer types where MSI could have a potential role in oncological treatment decisions.

Prognosis and chemosensitivity of deficient MMR phenotype in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: An AGEO retrospective multicenter study

Mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) and/or microsatellite instability-high (MSI) colorectal cancers (CRC) represent about 5% of metastatic CRC (mCRC). Prognosis and chemosensitivity of dMMR/MSI mCRC remain unclear. This multicenter study included consecutive patients with dMMR/MSI mCRC from 2007 to 2017. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS) in a population receiving first-line chemotherapy. Associations between chemotherapy regimen and survival were evaluated using a Cox regression model and inverse of probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) methodology in order to limit potential biases. Overall, 342 patients with dMMR/MSI mCRC were included. Median PFS and overall survival (OS) on first-line chemotherapy were 6.0 and 26.3 months, respectively. For second-line chemotherapy, median PFS and OS were 4.4 and 21.6 months. Longer PFS (8.1 vs. 5.4 months, p = 0.0405) and OS (35.1 vs. 24.4 months, p = 0.0747) were observed for irinotecan-based chemotherapy compared to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. The association was no longer statistically significant using IPTW methodology. In multivariable analysis, anti-VEGF as compared to anti-EGFR was associated with a trend to longer OS (HR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.00-3.19, p = 0.0518), whatever the backbone chemotherapy used. Our study shows that dMMR/MSI mCRC patients experienced short PFS with first-line chemotherapy with or without targeted therapy. OS was not different according to the chemotherapy regimen used, but a trend to better OS was observed with anti-VEGF. Our study provides some historical results concerning chemotherapy in dMMR/MSI mCRC in light of the recent nonrandomized trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Prognostic Heterogeneity of MRE11 Based on the Location of Primary Colorectal Cancer Is Caused by Activation of Different Immune Signals

Background: MRE11 plays an important role in DNA damage response for the maintenance of genome stability, and is becoming a prognostic marker for cancers, including colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the correlations of MRE11 to prognosis and tumor-infiltrating inflammatory cells (TIICs) in different locations of CRC remains unclear.

Methods: Among Swedish and TCGA-COREAD patients, we investigated the association of MRE11 expression, tumor-infiltrating inflammatory cells (TIICs) and microsatellite status with survival in right-sided colon cancer (RSCC) and left-sided colon and rectal cancer (LSCRC). The signaling of MRE11-related was further analyzed using weighted gene co-expression network analysis and ClueGO.

Results: High MRE11 expression alone or combination of high MRE11 expression with high TIICs was related to favorable prognosis in LSCRC. Moreover, high MRE11 expression was associated with favorable prognosis in LSCRC with microsatellite stability. The relationships above were adjusted for tumor stage, differentiation, and/or TIICs. However, no such evidence was observed in RSCC. Several signaling pathways involving MRE11 were found to be associated with cell cycle and DNA repair in RSCC and LSCRC, whereas, the activation of the immune response and necrotic cell death were specifically correlated with LSCRC.

Conclusions: High MRE11 expression is an independent prognostic marker in LSCRC and enhanced prognostic potency of combining high MRE11 with high TIICs in LSCRC, mainly due to differential immune signaling activated by MRE11 in RSCC and LSCRC, respectively.

Perspectives on Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

Despite lengthening survival, death rates from metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) remain unacceptably high, with a bright spot being the demonstration of durable responses in patients with CRC who have mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) and/or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors and are treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab, as well as nivolumab in combination with low-dose ipilimumab-all checkpoint inhibitors-are currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for patients with MSI-H/dMMR metastatic CRC that progressed following treatment with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. Nonetheless, there are a number of questions and considerations in the use of these checkpoint inhibitor therapies. Using a question-and-answer format, this review summarizes the scientific rationale for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in CRC, including the effects of tumor factors such as genetic aberrations and mutational load on the immune response, particularly in patients with MSI-H/dMMR disease. We discuss response patterns, response criteria, and immune-related adverse events using findings from published efficacy and safety data of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in metastatic CRC. We also discuss issues surrounding treatment sequencing, incorporating approved checkpoint inhibitors into the current treatment paradigm, and the multiple investigational strategies that may optimize immunotherapy for advanced CRC in the future, including novel combination therapies. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the U.S. Despite advances in chemotherapy, survival remains poor for patients with metastatic CRC. Certain immunotherapy agents have demonstrated long-lasting responses in previously treated patients with immune-responsive microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic CRC, leading to U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of the immune checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab (with or without low-dose ipilimumab) and pembrolizumab in this population. Combination therapy (e.g., nivolumab with low-dose ipilimumab) has demonstrated numerically higher response rates and improved long-term clinical benefit relative to anti-programmed death-1 monotherapy. Ongoing trials are evaluating immunotherapy in the broader CRC population and novel combinations to optimize immunotherapy for advanced CRC.

The Evolving Biomarker Landscape for Treatment Selection in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

The approval of targeted therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has led to important improvements in patient outcomes. However, it is still necessary to increase individualisation of treatments based on tumour genetic profiles to optimise efficacy, while minimising toxicity. As such, there is currently great focus on the discovery and validation of further biomarkers in mCRC, with many new potential prognostic and predictive markers being identified alongside developments in patient molecular profiling technologies. Here, we review data for validated and emerging biomarkers impacting treatment strategies in mCRC. We completed a structured literature search of the PubMed database to identify relevant publications, limiting for English-language publications published between 1 January 2014 and 11 July 2018. In addition, we performed a manual search of the key general oncology and CRC-focused congresses to identify abstracts reporting emerging mCRC biomarker data, and of ClinicalTrials.gov to identify ongoing clinical trials investigating emerging biomarkers in mCRC and/or molecular-guided clinical trials. There is solid evidence supporting the use of BRAF status as a prognostic biomarker and DYPD, UGT1A1, RAS, and microsatellite instability as predictive biomarkers in mCRC. There are a number of emerging biomarkers that may prove to be clinically relevant in the future to have prognostic (HPP1 methylation), predictive (HER3, microRNAs, anti-angiogenic markers, and CRC intrinsic subtypes), or both prognostic and predictive values (HER2, CpG island methylator phenotype, tumour mutational load, gene fusions, and consensus molecular subtypes). As such, new biomarker-led treatment strategies in addition to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor and anti-angiogenetic treatments are being explored. Biomarkers that are not recommended to be tested in clinical practice or are unlikely to be imminently clinically relevant for mCRC include thymidylate transferase, ERCC1, PIK3CA, and PTEN. We highlight the clinical utility of existing and emerging biomarkers in mCRC and provide recommended treatment strategies according to the biomarker status. An update on ongoing molecular-guided clinical trials is also provided.

Clinical Impact of PI3K/BRAF Mutations in RAS Wild Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Meta-analysis Results

BACKGROUND

Understanding the molecular mechanisms of colorectal cancer has evolved during the last decade ushering the era of personalized medicine. Alteration of BRAF and PI3K is common in colorectal cancer, and can affect several signaling pathways including EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor). The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the clinical role of PI3K and BRAF mutations in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) receiving an EGFR monoclonal antibody (anti-EGFR) inhibitor as first-line therapy.

METHODS

A literature search was performed to identify studies exploring the association between PI3K/BRAF mutations and clinical outcomes of KRAS wild-type mCRC patients treated with anti-EGFR as a first-line therapy. The primary clinical outcome was overall response rate (ORR). The secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The pooled relative risk (RR) or hazard ratio (HR) was estimated by using fixed-effect model or random effect model according to heterogeneity between studies.

RESULTS

Ten studies with 1470 mCRC patients (357 for PI3K studies and 1113 from BRAF studies) met selection criteria. We observed a trend towards lower ORR in patients with PI3K mutations (3 studies, 357 patients; ORR = 14.3% in mutant-type PI3K vs. 52.4% in wild-type PIK3CA [95% CI - 0.12-0.02]; P = 0.13). Patients with mutant-type PI3K have significant shorter PFS (3 studies, 357 patients, 3.8 vs. 4.15 months, HR = 1.36; [95% CI 1.04-1.77]; P = 0.02]), and OS (3 studies, 357 patients, 14.17 vs. 16.3 months, HR = 1.50; [95% CI 1.14-1.97]; P = 0.004) compared to those with wild PI3K. For BRAF, patients with mutant type have significantly lower ORR (7 studies, 1113 patients; ORR = 33% vs. 39%; [95% CI - 0.16-0.01]; P = 0.03), shorter PFS (5 studies, 814 patients, 3.9 vs. 5.7 months, HR = 1.72; [95% CI 1.47-2.01]; P = 0.00001), and shorter OS (4 studies, 766 pts., 9.1 vs. 18.9 months, HR = 1.22; [95% CI 1.04-1.44]; P = 0.01) compared to those with wild-type.

CONCLUSION

This analysis suggests that patients with mCRC and either PI3K or BRAF mutation may have a lower response and worse outcome when treated with anti-EGFR in the first line. Given their worse outcome, routine testing for BRAF and PI3K mutational status should be considered. Novel therapeutic approaches are needed for patients with mutations in BRAF or PI3K.

Impact of primary colorectal Cancer location on the KRAS status and its prognostic value

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) originating from the right-sided or left-sided colon is distinct clinicopathological entity. The KRAS status and its prognostic value in CRC remain controversial. This study aimed to investigate the association of KRAS status with clinicopathological features and prognostic value in CRC.

METHODS

178 colon cancer and 145 rectal cancer patients were enrolled. KRAS mutation test was performed on paraffin-embedded tumor samples using PCR methods. The colon cancer was divided into right-sided colon cancer (RCC) and left-sided colon cancer (LCC). Studies that reported the association of KRAS mutation with CRC clinical features and prognosis in databases were searched prior to 2018. The data of the present study was combined with the data of published studies using meta-analysis methods.

RESULTS

No significant difference between colon cancer and rectal cancer regarding the KRAS status. The KRAS mutation was much frequent in RCC than in LCC (p = 0.010). 17 studies with 11,385 colon cancer patients were selected, the pooled results of our data and previous published data showed that KRAS mutation was more frequent in RCC compared with in LCC (p < 0.01); KRAS mutation was not associated with the prognosis in RCC patient; however, KRAS mutation indicated a poor prognosis in LCC patients compared with KRAS wild type (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

KRAS status has no difference between colon cancer and rectal cancer. KRAS mutation was more frequent in RCC than in LCC, and associated with a poor prognosis in LCC patients, but not in RCC patients.

Outcome of chemotherapy with or without targeted agents in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with deficient DNA mismatch repair: A single center, cohort study

AIMS

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) is a rare disease accounting only for 4-5% of the whole mCRC and its optimal treatment still remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the outcome of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab or cetuximab in this setting.

METHODS

A total of 729 colorectal cancer patients with dMMR status were screened for eligibility. The Kaplan-Meier method, the log-rank test and Cox analysis were utilized for survival analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 43 patients met the inclusion criteria and enrolled in the study. The median overall survival (OS) of entire cohort was 21.7 months. Chemotherapy plus bevacizumab group exhibited a tendency of substantially higher overall response rate (ORR) than chemotherapy alone group (63.6% vs. 23.8%, P = 0.053), whereas the ORR between chemotherapy plus cetuximab group and chemotherapy alone group were similar (28.6% vs. 23.8%, P = 1.000). Compared with chemotherapy alone group, bevacizumab combined group achieved a significantly longer progression-free survival (10.0 months vs. 4.8 months, P = 0.028), whereas cetuximab combined group was not (6.8 months vs. 4.8 months, P = 0.158). Although the median OS seemed to favor bevacizumab combined group, no significant differences were detected between the three arms (33.7, 21.7 and 15.3 months, respectively; P = 0.345). Prognostic analysis showed that primary tumor resection was the positive prognostic factor of OS (hazards ratio: 0.438; P = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

dMMR mCRC seems resistant to chemotherapy and cetuximab. Bevacizumab combined therapy shows a sign of potentially favorable outcome in this subtype.

Efficacy of CapeOX plus Cetuximab Treatment as a First-Line Therapy for Patients with Extended RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA Wild-Type Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Background: Oxaliplatin and capecitabine (CapeOX) combined with cetuximab is rarely used to treat advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The present study aimed to clarify the clinical benefits of this treatment regimen when used as a first-line therapy in patients with expanded RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA wild-type mCRC, using the data and tumor specimens from two previously published Phase II clinical trials.

Methods: The gene mutation status and clinical data of 102 patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC, who received either of CapeOX + cetuximab or FOLFOX + cetuximab, were analyzed. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR) of CapeOX + cetuximab treatment in patients with extended RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA wild-type mCRC. RR comparisons and maximum tumor size changes between different treatment regimens and gene mutation status were set as key secondary endpoints.

Results: We identified 88 patients with extended RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA wild-type mCRC. Those treated with CapeOX + cetuximab (n = 52) had a 61.5% RR (95% CI, 47.0-74.7%), while those treated with FOLFOX + cetuximab (n = 36) had a 66.7% RR (95% CI, 49.0-81.4%). Patients with any mutation (n = 14) had a 42.9% RR (95% CI, 17.1-71.1%). There were no significant differences between these three groups (P = 0.298). The disease control rate was 86.5% (95% CI, 74.2-94.4%) in the CapeOX + cetuximab group, and 88.9% (95% CI, 73.9-96.9%) in the FOLFOX + cetuximab group. Maximum tumor size changes were largest in patients with wild-type mCRC treated with FOLFOX + cetuximab followed by patients with wild-type mCRC treated with CapeOX + cetuximab, and then by those with any mutation (-63.2%, -52.6%, and -27.3%, respectively; P = 0.035).

Conclusions: Patients with RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA wild-type mCRC had a sufficient RR following first-line treatment with CapeOX + cetuximab. These results suggest that this combination therapy should be considered as a treatment option for patients with advanced mCRC.