Effects of Postoperative Radiotherapy in Early Breast Cancer Patients Older than 75 Years: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

The trade-off of post-mastectomy radiotherapy usage for the breast cancer patients aged 70 years or older: a study based on SEER database

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the role of post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in the female aged 70 years or older diagnosed with breast cancer, which is still controversial.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled female breast cancer women aged 70 + years following mastectomy from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce covariable imbalance. A nomogram was created to predict the 1,3,5-years overall survival (OS) and divide patients into three risk groups.

RESULTS

After matching, PMRT were associated with significant improvement in breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and OS (p < 0.001). By contrast, the BCSS and OS benefit from PMRT were not significant in patients with T1N1 tumor (BCSS: HR = 0.716, p = 0.249;OS:HR = 0.908, p = 0.572), and T2N1 tumor (BCSS:HR = 0.866, p = 0.289;OS:HR = 0.879, p = 0.166). Stratified by subtype, the HR+/HER-2- subtype and the HR-/HER-2- subtype (all p < 0.001) have a significant prolonged survival, yet not significant BCSS difference are shown in the HER-2 + tumor. In the low-risk group as determined by the nomogram, the use of PMRT did not significantly improve OS (p = 0.203).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that PMRT improves the survival of females with elderly breast cancer, while for T1-2N1 breast cancer patients, the omission of PMRT could be considered. Furthermore, the nomogram we constructed could be used as a decision tool for the omission of PMRT in low-risk elderly patients.

HDAC-an important target for improving tumor radiotherapy resistance

Radiotherapy is an important means of tumor treatment, but radiotherapy resistance has been a difficult problem in the comprehensive treatment of clinical tumors. The mechanisms of radiotherapy resistance include the repair of sublethal damage and potentially lethal damage of tumor cells, cell repopulation, cell cycle redistribution, and reoxygenation. These processes are closely related to the regulation of epigenetic modifications. Histone deacetylases (HDACs), as important regulators of the epigenetic structure of cancer, are widely involved in the formation of tumor radiotherapy resistance by participating in DNA damage repair, cell cycle regulation, cell apoptosis, and other mechanisms. Although the important role of HDACs and their related inhibitors in tumor therapy has been reviewed, the relationship between HDACs and radiotherapy has not been systematically studied. This article systematically expounds for the first time the specific mechanism by which HDACs promote tumor radiotherapy resistance in vivo and in vitro and the clinical application prospects of HDAC inhibitors, aiming to provide a reference for HDAC-related drug development and guide the future research direction of HDAC inhibitors that improve tumor radiotherapy resistance.

Dosimetric comparison between intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy in patients of left-sided breast cancer treated with modified radical mastectomy: CONSORT

Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is a novel treatment strategy that protects normal tissues and enhances target volume coverage during radiotherapy.This study aimed to clarify whether VMAT is superior to intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in treatment planning for left-sided breast cancer patients after modified radical mastectomy.Left-sided breast cancer patients treated with modified radical mastectomy were eligible for analysis. The dose distribution of both planning target volume and organs at risk were analyzed by using dose volume histograms.Twenty-four patients were eligible for analysis. Both VMAT and IMRT plans were sufficient in planning target volume coverage. In terms of conformity, VMAT was superior to IMRT (P = .034). Dmean, V5, and V10 of the heart were significantly decreased in VMAT plans when compared with IMRT plans. VMAT was as effective as IMRT plans in sparing of other normal tissues. In addition, both the mean number of monitor units and treatment time were significantly reduced when VMAT was compared with IMRT.VMAT plans was equivalent or superior to IMRT plans in dose distribution, and was associated with slightly advantage in sparing of the heart and coronary arteries. Our analyses suggested VMAT as a preferred option in left-sided breast cancer patients treated with modified radical mastectomy.