Anti-PD-1 Therapy plus Chemotherapy and/or Bevacizumab as Second Line or later Treatment for Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus recombinant human endostatin therapy as second-line treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with negative driver gene: a pilot study

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent findings indicating an intertwined regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling and immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment suggest that the combination of ICIs and angiogenesis inhibitors could have synergistic antitumor activity, along with favorable tolerability. However, ICIs plus anti-angiogenesis therapy has not been widely evaluated. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICIs plus recombinant human (rh)-endostatin as second-line treatment in advanced NSCLC with negative driver gene.

Method

Prospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of ICIs plus rh-endostain as second-line treatment in advanced NSCLC with negative driver gene. The primary endpoints of the study were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (ORR), and safety.

Results

A total of 34 patients were recruited in this study. 18 patients received ICIs plus anti-angiogenesis therapy (ICIs combination therapy), and 16 patients received ICIs monotherapy. DCR was 88.9% vs 43.8% (P = 0.009). Median PFS (mPFS) was 8.3 months vs. 3.7 months (HR = 0.276, 95% CI 0.125-0.607, P = 0.001). Median OS (mOS) was 18.0 months vs 9.6 months (HR=0.364, 95% CI 0.147-0.902, P=0.009). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, ICI combination therapy prolonged PFS (HR = 0.069, 95% CI 0.019-0.185, P < 0.001) and OS (HR = 0.044, 95% CI 0.011-0.185, P < 0.001). We did not observe a significant difference in the incidence of adverse events (AEs) between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Compared with ICIs monotherapy, ICIs combination therapy improves clinical response in patients with advanced NSCLC with negative driver gene, significantly prolongs PFS and OS, and does not significantly difference the incidence of AEs.

Immunotherapy combined with rh-endostatin improved clinical outcomes over immunotherapy plus chemotherapy for second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC

Background

Despite the fact that numerous clinical and preclinical studies have demonstrated the synergistic effects of combining antiangiogenic or chemotherapy with immunotherapy, no data have been found to indicate that combination therapy is more effective and safer as second-line therapy.

Methods

We retrospectively compared the effectiveness and safety of ICIs plus rh-endostatin to ICIs plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The evaluation indicators of this study were progression-free survival (PFS), safety profile, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and 1-year overall survival (OS).

Results

The median PFS with immunotherapy plus rh-endostatin (IE) was 7.10 months (95% CI, 4.64 to 9.56) versus 5.13 months (95% CI, 4.29 to 5.97) with immunotherapy plus chemotherapy (IC) (HR, 0.56; 95%CI, 0.33 to 0.95). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 7.5% of the IE group versus 25.0% of the IC group. The ORR in the IE group was 35.0% versus 20.8% in the IC group (P = 0.137), and the DCR in the IE group was 92.5% versus 77.1% in the IC group (P = 0.049). The 1-year OS rate for the IE group was 69.4%, which was higher than the 61.4% of the IC group.

Conclusion

Our study showed that ICI therapy combined with endostatin therapy exhibits high efficacy and safety, suggesting that such a combination might be a viable treatment option for patients with pre-treated NSCLC in the future.

Sintilimab plus autologous NK cells as second-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previous treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy

This pilot study (NCT03958097; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03958097) was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1 antibody combined autologous NK cells in the treatment of patients with stage IIIB/IIIC or IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who failed the first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. All patients received both sintilimab 200mg and 3×10⁹ NK cells every 3 weeks. 20 patients were enrolled, median follow up time was 22.6 months. The median PFS was 11.6 months, ORR was 45%. Median OS was 17.7 months, 6-month OS rate and 12-month OS rate was 95.0% and 80.0%. Unexpected adverse events were not observed. 2 patients reported grade 3 adverse events (hypertriglyceridemia, neutropenia and increased creatine kinase). The autologous NK cells did not add extra adverse events to the ICI treatment. Autologous NK plus sintilimab showed promising antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile in advanced driven-mutation negative NSCLC who failed on the first line treatment.

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents with or without chemotherapy versus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as second or later-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world retrospective cohort study

Background

The aim of this study was to assessment the efficacy and safety of Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/Programmed cell death-Ligand protein 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents with or without chemotherapy versus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as second or later-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods

In this study, pre-treatment clinical and laboratory indicators from 73 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer were retrieved for retrospective analysis. According to the therapy regimes they received, the patients were separated into groups, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy group (PC group), PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents' group (PA group), PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents plus chemotherapy group (PAC group). Cox's proportional hazards regression model and Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were used to assess the connection between treatment regimens and progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In addition, the association of treatment regimens with the risk of disease progression and death was evaluated by subgroup analysis.

Results

The average age of the enrolled patients was 58.2 ± 10.2 years and 75.3% were male. Multivariate analyses showed that patients in PA group (Disease progression: HR 0.4, P=0.005. Death: HR 0.4, P=0.024) and PAC group (Disease progression: HR 0.3, P=0.012. Death: HR 0.3, P=0.045) had a statistically significant lower hazard ratio (HR) for disease progression and death compared to patients in PC group. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients in PA group (mPFS:7.5 vs.3.5, P=0.00052. mOS:33.1 vs.21.8, P=0.093) and PAC group (mPFS:5.1 vs.3.5, P=0.075. mOS:37.3 vs.21.8, P=0.14) had a longer PFS and OS compared to patients in PC group. In all the pre-defined subgroups, patients in PA and PAC groups showed a decreasing trend in the risk of disease progression and death in most subgroups. The patients in PA group (DCR:96.3% vs.58.3%, P=0.001) and PAC group (DCR:100% vs.58.3%, P=0.019) had a better disease control rate (DCR) than patients in PC group.

Conclusion

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents with or without chemotherapy were superior to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as second or later-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Short-term dynamics of circulating tumor DNA predicting efficacy of sintilimab plus docetaxel in second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC: biomarker analysis from a single-arm, phase 2 trial

OBJECTIVE

Robust biomarker predicting efficacy of immunotherapy is limited. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sought to effectively monitor therapeutic response as well as disease progression. This study aims to investigate predictive role of ctDNA short-term dynamic change (6 weeks postimmunotherapy) in a single-arm, phase 2 trial of sintilimab plus docetaxel for previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

A total of 33 patients with advanced NSCLC with disease progression during or after any first-line treatment were prospectively enrolled between 2019 and 2020. Patients received sintilimab (200 mg, day 1, every 3 weeks) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m², day 3, every 3 weeks) for 4-6 cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with sintilimab (200 mg, day 1, every 3 weeks) until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects. Blood samples were prospectively collected at baseline, and after 2 cycles of treatment (6 weeks post-treatment). All samples were subjected to targeted next-generation sequencing with a panel of 448 cancer-related genes. The landscape of high-frequency genomic profile of baseline and 6th week was described. Major molecular characteristics in preselected genes of interest associated with response to second-line chemoimmunotherapy were analyzed. The curative effects and prognosis of patients were evaluated.

RESULTS

Patients with ctDNA clearance at 6th week had decreased tumor volume, while most patients with positive ctDNA at 6th-week experienced an increase in tumor volume. Positive 6th-week ctDNA was associated with significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (91 vs NR days; p<0.0001) and overall survival (47 vs 467 days; p =0.0039). Clearance of clonal mutations and none new clonal formation at 6th week were associated with longer PFS (mPFS 89 vs 266 days, p =0.003). ctDNA clearance at 6th week was an independent risk factor for progression or death (HR=100 (95% CI 4.10 to 2503.00), p=0.005).

CONCLUSION

ctDNA status and ctDNA mutation clearance putatively serve as predictive biomarkers for sintilimab combined with docetaxel chemotherapy in pretreated advanced NSCLC patients.

The efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy or anti-angiogenic therapy as a second-line or later treatment option for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective comparative cohort study

BACKGROUND

Although immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy remains the standard of second-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) , the objective response rate (ORR) is low. There is an urgent need to increase the response population of second-line immunotherapy, and ICI combination therapy may be a possible option. However, the evidence is insufficient.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected the medical records of patients who received ICI monotherapy or ICI combination therapy as a second-line or later treatment option. We further analysed baseline clinical characteristics, evaluated treatment efficacy, assessed treatment-related adverse events (AEs) and followed up survival. The outcome variables assessed in the study were ORR, disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and AEs.

RESULTS

A total of 145 patients were ultimately enrolled in this study, including the ICI monotherapy group (n=63) and ICI combination therapy group (n=82). The ICI combination therapy group was further divided into the ICI/chemotherapy group (n=57) and ICI/anti-angiogenic therapy group (n=25). The baseline was comparable among the three subgroups. The ICI combination therapy groups showed a higher ORR (29.3% vs. 11.1%, P=0.008) and DCR (85.4% vs. 61.9%, P=0.001) and a longer PFS (6.77 vs. 3.47 months, P<0.001) and OS (18.60 vs. 8.47 months, P<0.001) than the ICI monotherapy group. The ICI/chemotherapy group showed a significantly higher ORR (31.6% vs. 11.1%, P=0.006) and DCR (84.2% vs. 61.9%, P=0.006) and a longer PFS (6.37 vs. 3.47 months, P<0.001) and OS (18.60 vs. 8.47 months, P<0.001) than the ICI monotherapy group. The ICI/anti-angiogenic therapy group showed a significantly higher DCR (88.0% vs. 61.9%, P=0.021) and a longer PFS (8.17 vs. 3.47 months, P<0.001) and OS (19.20 vs. 8.47 months, P=0.005) than the ICI monotherapy group. Neither of the combined ICI therapy groups showed a significant increase in the incidence of AEs compared to the ICI monotherapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

ICI combined with chemotherapy or anti-angiogenic therapy as second-line or later treatment demonstrated superiority over ICI monotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients without prior immunotherapy. These results provide a potentially superior treatment strategy and require verification in prospective clinical trials.

State-of-the-art combination treatment strategies for advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most abundant type of epithelial lung cancer being diagnosed after 40% of invasions of excrescence in pulmonary tissues. According to WHO, 30% of NSCLC patients can be cured if diagnosed and treated early. Mutations play an important role in advanced stage NSCLC treatment, which includes critical proteins necessary for cellular growth and replication. Restricting such mutations may improve survival in lung cancer patients. Newer technologies include endoscopic bronchial ultrasonography and esophageal ultrasonography. Currently, policymaking or decision-making for treatment regimens merely depends on the genomic alterations and mutations. DNA sequencing, methylation, protein, and fragmented DNA analysis do NSCLC screening. Achievement of these goals requires consideration of available therapeutics in current anticancer approaches for improving quality of life and treatment outcomes for NSCLC patient. The specific goals of this review are to discuss first-line and second-line therapies for advanced-stage NSCLC and molecularly targeted therapy including thoughtful discussion on precise role of treatment strategies in specific tumors. Also, concerned diagnostics, new clinical trial designs, and pursuing appropriate combinations of radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy with biological therapy for exceptional cases considering resistance mechanisms and palliative care will be discussed.

Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 inhibitor combined with nab-paclitaxel in Chinese patients with refractory melanoma

PURPOSE

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the combined effect of anti-PD-1 inhibitor and nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel for refractory melanoma among Chinese patients.

METHODS

Data from January 2018 to March 2021 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Sixty-four patients were eligible for analysis from a single Chinese cancer center.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 16.0 months at data cutoff. The objective response rate (ORR) was 29.7%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 67.2% in all patients. Treatment-naïve patients had significantly higher ORR than pretreated patients (42.9% vs 13.8%, p = 0.011). Cutaneous melanoma patients with NRAS gene mutation benefited more than non-mutated patients (DCR of 100% vs. 54.5%) (p = 0.030). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) of all patients was 5.2 months and the duration of response was 10.8 months. Median duration of disease control was 7.7 months. Prior treatment-naïve patients had significantly longer PFS than those who accepted prior treatments (7.2 vs. 5.1 months, p = 0.024). Patients with abnormally high LDH level had shorter mPFS (3.6 months vs. 6.6 months, p = 0.020). Median overall survival was not reached in this study. Most patients experienced adverse events (AEs), but only 17.2% of patients experienced grade 3 severe AEs. The most common AEs were alopecia (89.1%), neutropenia (18.8%), pruritus (15.6%), and arthralgia (14.1%). Some patients had immune related AEs (irAEs). No grade 4 or 5 AEs were observed. Patients with ≥ 3 AEs or with irAEs had longer mPFS (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Nab-paclitaxel combined with PD-1 antibody is a well-tolerated and effective regimen for Chinese patients with refractory melanoma.

ICI plus chemotherapy prolonged survival over ICI alone in patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC

OBJECTIVES

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) monotherapy was standard of care in second-line treatment of patients with advance non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aims to investigate the efficacy of ICI plus chemotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An investigator-initiated trial (IIT) aiming to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICI in combination with chemotherapy as second line and beyond for patients with advanced NSCLC was undergone at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital (ChiCTR1900026203). Patients who received ICI monotherapy as second or later line setting during the same period were also collected as a comparator.

RESULTS

From April 2018 to June 2019, 31 patients were included into this IIT study, simultaneously 51 patients treated with ICI monotherapy were selected as a comparator. ICI plus chemotherapy showed a significantly higher ORR (35.5% vs. 15.7%, p=0.039), prolonged PFS (median: 5.6 vs. 2.5 months, p = 0.013) and OS (median: NE vs. 12.6 months, p = 0.038) compared with ICI alone. In the subgroup of negative PD-L1 expression (9 patients in combination group and 12 patients in monotherapy group), ICI plus chemotherapy also had a favorable ORR (44.4% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.119), longer PFS (median: 6.5 vs 3.0 months, p < 0.05) and OS (median: NE vs. 8.2 months, p = 0.117). Meanwhile, the addition of chemotherapy did not increase immune-related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

ICI plus chemotherapy showed superior ORR, PFS and OS than ICI alone patients with previous treated advanced NSCLC. These findings warrant further investigation.

Clinical Outcomes for PD-1 Inhibitor Plus Chemotherapy as Second-Line or Later Therapy Compared to PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitor Alone in Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

Background

Programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor monotherapy has been approved as second-line or later therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy as second-line or later therapy in advanced NSCLC.

Methods

The clinical data of patients with advanced NSCLC who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as second-line or later line therapy was retrospectively collected. Patients were assigned to one of the two groups according to the therapeutic modality used: PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy group or PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy combination therapy group. Disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated between the two groups. The prognostic effect of the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) on the outcomes was also evaluated.

Results

From April 2017 to October 2019, a total of 84 patients were enrolled in the current study. Twenty-six patients (PD-1 inhibitor, n = 25; PD-L1 inhibitor, n = 1) received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy, and fifty-eight patients received PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy. The chemotherapy regimens used were as follows: liposome paclitaxel (n = 15); nab-paclitaxel (n = 12); docetaxel (n = 9); pemetrexed (n = 6); and others (n = 16). The DCR and OS were not significantly different between the two groups. The PFS of the monotherapy group was longer than that of the combination therapy group (mPFS: 9.6 vs. 4.6 months, P = 0.01). Univariate and multivariate analyses suggested that LDH and sex were independent prognostic factors of PFS. In the second-line therapy subgroup of 38 patients, OS and PFS were not significantly different between the two groups. In the subgroup of 46 patients treated beyond the 2nd line, the monotherapy group had a longer PFS (mPFS: 9.6 vs. 4.2 months, P = 0.01). The incidence of any-grade adverse events was not significantly different between the monotherapy group and the combination therapy group (19.2 vs. 18.9%, P = 1.000). One patient in the PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy group died of immune-related pneumonitis.

Conclusion

The clinical outcomes of PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy as second-line or later therapy were similar to those of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor alone in advanced NSCLC.

Metastatic sites as predictors in advanced NSCLC treated with PD-1 inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors are the first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, their efficacy in metastatic NSCLC patients remains controversial.

AIM OF THE STUDY

The aim of our study was to evaluate the prognosis of advanced metastatic NSCLC patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors, and discuss the predictive effect of metastatic site on the long-term outcome.

METHODS

The Embase, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PubMed databases were systematically screened up to February 10, 2020. Twenty-five eligible studies, involving 8,067 patients that assessed the impact of metastatic sites on survival outcome were incorporated in our study. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were described as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Among the advanced NSCLC patients, the median proportion of brain, liver, bone, and adrenal gland metastases were 21%, 17%, 35%, and 21%, respectively. Patients with metastases to the brain, liver, and bone had worse OS compared to patients without these metastases when treated with PD-1 inhibitors. Similarly, patients with metastasis to the brain and liver were more likely to progress when treated with PD-1 inhibitors. Besides, patients with multiple metastatic sites had worse PFS compared to patients with one metastatic site, while no significant difference was found in terms of OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the findings of our systematic review and meta-analysis, metastatic sites were independent predictors of the survival outcome for advanced NSCLC patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors.

ctDNA Concentration, MIKI67 Mutations and Hyper-Progressive Disease Related Gene Mutations Are Prognostic Markers for Camrelizumab and Apatinib Combined Multiline Treatment in Advanced NSCLC

Immunotherapy by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has showed outstanding efficacy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The combination of immunotherapy with anti-angiogenic therapy exhibited enhanced efficacy in multiline treatment. However, the potential biomarkers for predicting and monitoring the therapeutic response of the combined therapy remain undefined. In this study, we performed a pilot study by prospectively recruiting 22 advanced NSCLC patients who failed to previous lines of chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, TKI therapy, surgery, or any combination of the therapies, and investigated the prognostic factors for patients who received anti-PD-1 (Camrelizumab) and anti-angiogenic (Apatinib) combined therapy. The objective response rate (ORR) assessed by an independent radiology review was 22.7%, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.25 months. We found that high concentration of circulating-free DNA (cfDNA) (HR = 27.75, P = 0.003), MIKI67 mutation (HR = 114.11, P = 0.009) and gene variations related to hyper-progressive disease (HPD) (HR = 36.85, P = 0.004) were independent risk factors and exhibited significant correlation with PFS. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) mutational status was also a predicting indicator for PFS. In contrast, the blood tumor mutational burden (bTMB) could not stratify the clinical benefit in this combined therapy (HR = 0.81, P = 0.137). Furthermore, we found that the variant allele fraction (VAF) of mutations in ctDNA was sensitive indicators of therapeutic response and therefore can be used to monitor the tumor relief or progression. In conclusion, cfDNA concentration, MIKI67 mutations and HPD-related mutations were independent risk factors and PFS predictors for multiline combined anti-angiogenic/ICI combined therapy. ctDNA may be a novel monitoring biomarker for therapeutic response and predicting biomarker for prognosis in future combined therapy involving PD-1 blockade.

PD-1/PD-L1 Based Combinational Cancer Therapy: Icing on the Cake

Cancer has been a major global health problem due to its high morbidity and mortality. While many chemotherapy agents have been studied and applied in clinical trials or in clinic, their application is limited due to its toxic side effects and poor tolerability. Monoclonal antibodies specific to the PD-1 and PD-L1 immune checkpoints have been approved for the treatment of various tumors. However, the application of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors remains suboptimal and thus another strategy comes in to our sight involving the combination of checkpoint inhibitors with other agents, enhancing the therapeutic efficacy. Various novel promising approaches are now in clinical trials, just as icing on the cake. This review summarizes relevant investigations on combinatorial therapeutics based on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition.