Drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres microspheres for treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

The Recent Trends of Systemic Treatments and Locoregional Therapies for Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a hepatic malignancy that has a rapidly increasing incidence. CCA is anatomically classified into intrahepatic (iCCA) and extrahepatic (eCCA), which is further divided into perihilar (pCCA) and distal (dCCA) subtypes, with higher incidence rates in Asia. Despite its rarity, CCA has a low 5-year survival rate and remains the leading cause of primary liver tumor-related death over the past 10-20 years. The systemic therapy section discusses gemcitabine-based regimens as primary treatments, along with oxaliplatin-based options. Second-line therapy is limited but may include short-term infusional fluorouracil (FU) plus leucovorin (LV) and oxaliplatin. The adjuvant therapy section discusses approaches to improve overall survival (OS) post-surgery. However, only a minority of CCA patients qualify for surgical resection. In comparison to adjuvant therapies, neoadjuvant therapy for unresectable cases shows promise. Gemcitabine and cisplatin indicate potential benefits for patients awaiting liver transplantation. The addition of immunotherapies to chemotherapy in combination is discussed. Nivolumab and innovative approaches like CAR-T cells, TRBAs, and oncolytic viruses are explored. We aim in this review to provide a comprehensive report on the systemic and locoregional therapies for CCA.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of conventional transarterial chemoembolization and drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization in unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A multicenter retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

The efficacy and safety of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) and conventional TACE (c-TACE) in the treatment of patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remained controversial. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between c-TACE and DEB-TACE among patients with ICC.

METHOD

Between June 10, 2016 and November 19, 2022, consecutive patients with pathological diagnoses of ICC were divided into the DEB-TACE group and the c-TACE group based on the type of TACE treatment they received. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare overall survival (OS) between the two groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the characteristics between the c-TACE group and the DEB-TACE group.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients were included in this study, with 64 patients in the c-TACE group and 68 patients in the DEB-TACE group. The median OS for c-TACE and DEB-TACE was 5 and 12 months, respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) for c-TACE and DEB-TACE was 0 % and 66.2 %, respectively; the disease control rate (DCR) was 37.5 % and 91.2 %. There were no significant differences between c-TACE and DEB-TACE among adverse effects at 3 months after treatment (P > 0.05). The results remained consistent after PSM. The Cox regression demonstrated that the DEB-TACE was an independent protective factor for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in the DEB-TACE group had longer OS and higher ORR and DCR than those in the c-TACE group, but no significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding adverse effects.

Clinical research progress of callisperes® of drug-loaded microsphere arterial chemoembolisation in the treatment of solid tumors

The incidence and mortality of cancer is ever-increasing, which poses a significant challengesto human health and a substantial economic burden to patients. At present, chemotherapy is still a primary treatment for various cancers. However, chemotherapy kills tumors but also induces the related side effects, whichadversely impacting patient quality of life and exacerbating suffering. Therefore, there is an urgent need for new and effective treatments that can control tumor growth while reducing the side effects for patients. Arterial chemoembolization has been attracted much attentionwhich attributed to the advantage of ability to embolize tumor vessels to block blood and nutrition supplies. Thus, to achieve local tumor control, it has become an effective means of local tumor control and has been widely used in clinical practice. Despite its efficacy, conventional arterial chemoembolization techniques, limited by embolization materials, have been associated with incomplete embolization and suboptimal drug delivery outcomes. Gradually, researchers have shifted their attention to a new type of embolic material called CalliSperes® drug-eluting embolic bead (DEB). DEB can not only load high doses of drugs, but also has strong sustained drug release ability and good biocompatibility. The integration of DEBs with traditional arterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) promises targeted vascular embolization, mitigated tumor ischemia and hypoxia, and direct intravascular chemotherapy delivery. It can prevent cancer cell differentiation and accelerate their death, meanwhile, directly injecting chemotherapy drugs into the target blood vessels reduced the blood concentration of the whole body, thus reduced the toxic and side effects of chemotherapy. Furthermore, DEB-TACE's sustained drug release capability elevates local drug concentrations at the tumor site, amplifying its antitumor efficacy. Therefore, DEB-TACE has become a hot spot in clinical research worldwide. This review introduces the pathogenesis of solid tumors, the background of research and biological characteristics of DEB, and the action mechanism of DEB-TACE, as well as its clinical research in various solid tumors and future prospects. This review aims to provide new ideas for the treatment of DEB-TACE in various solid tumors.

Exploring the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization in pancreatic cancer liver metastasis

OBJECTIVES

Drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) has shown promise as a treatment modality for primary liver cancer and colorectal cancer liver metastasis. However, its role in pancreatic cancer liver metastasis (PCLM) remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of DEB-TACE in PCLM patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study included 10 PCLM patients who underwent DEB-TACE using CalliSpheres® microspheres as the chemoembolization material. Treatment response, survival outcomes, adverse events, and liver function indexes were comprehensively assessed.

RESULTS

Among the patients, complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease rates were 0.0%, 40.0%, 30.0%, and 30.0%, respectively. The objective response rate was 40.0%, and the disease-control rate was 70.0%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.0 months (95% CI: 0.0-26.7), with a 1-year PFS rate of 48.0%. The median overall survival (OS) was 18.0 months (95% CI: 6.0-30.0), with a 1-year OS rate of 80.0%. Additionally, no significant differences were observed in any of the liver function indexes, including alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, etc., between pre- and posttreatment evaluations. Adverse events included pain, grade 1-2 vomiting, fever, and transient liver dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

DEB-TACE demonstrates a promising treatment response, favorable survival profile, and satisfactory safety in PCLM patients.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This study adds to the current research by providing novel evidence on the efficacy, safety, and favorable survival outcomes of DEB-TACE in treating PCLM, highlighting its potential as an effective therapeutic option in this specific population.

Risk factors of liver abscess and biloma formation after drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) causes serious complications, including liver abscess and biloma formation. This study aimed to investigate the frequency and risk factors of liver abscess and biloma formation after dug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

152 unresectable ICC patients received 241 DEB-TACE procedures from February 2018 to November 2022 were studied retrospectively. Patients were evaluated for the presence of liver abscess and biloma formation after DEB-TACE. The medical records, including baseline demographic data, preoperative imaging data, DEB-TACE details, and postoperative management, were reviewed to search for risk factors of liver abscess and biloma formation.

RESULTS

Liver abscesses developed in 11 cases, with an incidence rate of 7.2 % (11/152) per patient and 4.6 % (11/241) per procedure. In the 11 patients with abscesses, the incidence of biloma formation was 36.4 % (n = 4). The binary logistic regression analysis showed that diabetes mellitus (OR 7.967, 95 % CI 1.491-42.571, p = 0.015), bilioenterostomy or biliary stent implantation (OR 18.716, 95 % CI 1.006-348.049, p = 0.049) and grade 1 arterial occlusion (OR 9.712, 95 % CI 1.054-89.484, p = 0.045) were independent risk factors for liver abscess and biloma formation.

CONCLUSION

Liver abscesses and biloma formation induced by DEB-TACE are associated with various factors. Diabetes mellitus, bilioenterostomy or biliary stent implantation, and grade 1 artery occlusion were all associated with liver abscess and biloma formation after DEB-TACE for unresectable ICC. In patients with these risk factors, the DEB-TACE procedure should be finely designed and manipulated with more caution.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Evolving strategies in management and treatment

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is the second most frequent primary liver cancer after hepatocellular carcinoma. According to International Classification of Diseases-11 (ICD-11), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is identified by a specific diagnostic code, different with respect to perihilar-CCA or distal-CCA. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma originates from intrahepatic small or large bile ducts including the second-order bile ducts and has a silent presentation that combined with the highly aggressive nature and refractoriness to chemotherapy contributes to the alarming increasing incidence and mortality. Indeed, at the moment of the diagnosis, less than 40% of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma are suitable of curative surgical therapy, that is so far the only effective treatment. The main goals of clinicians and researchers are to make an early diagnosis, and to carry out molecular characterization to provide the patient with personalized treatment. Unfortunately, these goals are not easily achievable because of the heterogeneity of this tumor from anatomical, molecular, biological, and clinical perspectives. However, recent progress has been made in molecular characterization, surgical treatment, and management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and, this article deals with these advances.

Locoregional therapy combined with systemic therapy (LRT + ST) for unresectable and metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The outcome of systemic therapy (ST) for unresectable and metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is poor. This study aims to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of locoregional therapy combined with systemic therapy (LRT + ST) compared with only ST in unresectable and metastatic iCCA by performing a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to November 3, 2022. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Ten retrospective cohort studies with 3,791 unresectable or metastatic iCCA patients were enrolled in this study, including 1,120 who received ablation, arterially directed therapy (ADT), or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) combined with ST. The meta-analysis showed that the LRT + ST group had a better OS (HR = 0.51; 95% CI =0.41-0.64; p value < 0.001), PFS (HR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.22-0.71, p value = 0.002) and ORR (RR = 1.68; 95% CI = 1.17-2.42; p value = 0.005). Subgroup analysis showed that both ST combined with ADT (HR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.31-0.56, p value < 0.001) and EBRT (HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.63-0.72, p value < 0.001) could improve OS. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, anorexia, and vomiting did not show significant differences between the groups (p value > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with only ST, LRT + ST improved survival outcomes for unresectable and metastatic iCCA patients without increasing severe AEs, which can further provide a basis for guidelines.

Efficacy of CalliSpheres® microspheres versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of refractory colorectal cancer liver metastasis

OBJECTIVE

CalliSpheres® is a microsphere that is already widely used for primary liver cancer treatment; however, its application in colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) is limited. The current study aimed to investigate the efficacy of CalliSpheres® drug-eluting bead (DEB) transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) therapy versus (vs.) conventional cTACE therapy in treating refractory CRLM (RCRLM) patients.

METHODS

Twenty-two RCRLM patients who underwent CalliSpheres® DEB-TACE therapy (n = 11) or cTACE therapy (n = 11) were retrospectively analyzed. Data on clinical response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were retrieved.

RESULTS

The objective response rate (36.4% vs. 18.2%, P = 0.338) and disease control rate (81.8% vs. 54.4%, P = 0.170) were both numerically (but not statistically) higher in the DEB-TACE group than in the cTACE group. Meanwhile, PFS was prolonged in the DEB-TACE group compared with the cTACE group [median: 12.0 (95% CI: 5.6-18.4) vs. 4.0 (95% CI: 0.9-7.1) months, P = 0.018]; OS was also longer in the DEB-TACE group compared with the cTACE group [median: 24.0 (95% CI: 18.3-29.7) vs. 14.0 (95% CI: 7.1-20.9) months, P = 0.040]. In addition, after adjustment by multivariate Cox analyses, DEB-TACE was superior to cTACE independently regarding PFS (HR: 0.110, 95% CI: 0.026-0.463, P = 0.003) and OS (HR: 0.126, 95% CI: 0.028-0.559, P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

CalliSpheres® DEB-TACE therapy may prolong survival profile than cTACE therapy in RCRLM patients, while further validation is still needed.

Locoregional Therapy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: The Role of Intra-Arterial Therapies

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a rare disease with a rising incidence. While surgical resection is the only curative option, the disease process is often identified in advanced stages, as this malignancy often remains clinically silent in early development. Only one-third of patients are eligible for resection at the time of diagnosis. For patients who cannot undergo resection, intra-arterial therapies are reasonable palliative treatment options; in rare occasions, these may be bridging therapies, as well. The premise of bland embolization and most chemoembolization intra-arterial therapies is that the arterial supply of the tumor is occluded to induce tumor necrosis, while radioembolization utilizes the arterial flow of the tumor to deliver radiation therapy. In this review, we discuss the use of transarterial embolization, transarterial chemoembolization, and selective internal radiation therapy for the treatment of ICC. Phase III randomized controlled clinical trials are difficult to tailor to this extremely rare and aggressive disease, but ultimately, further investigation should be pursued to define the patient population that will derive the greatest benefit from each modality.

Locoregional Treatment in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Which Treatment for Which Patient?

For unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC), different locoregional treatments (LRT) could be proposed to patients, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or transarterial treatments, depending on patient and tumor characteristics and local expertise. These different techniques of LRT have not been compared in a randomized clinical trial; most of the relevant studies are retrospective and not comparative. The aim of this narrative review is to help clinicians in their everyday practice discuss the pros and cons of each LRT, depending on the individual characteristics of their patients.

Efficacy and safety of CalliSpheres® Microsphere transcatheter-arterial chemoembolization versus conventional TACE in treating renal angiomyolipoma patients

Objective

Transcatheter-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a well-established interventional technique for various tumor treatments, whereas its application in renal angiomyolipoma (RAML) is seldom reported. Conventional TACE (cTACE) with bleomycin-lipiodol emulsion is effective and tolerable for RAML treatment. In this study, we aimed to further explore the efficacy and safety between bleomycin-loaded CalliSpheres® microsphere TACE (CSM-TACE) and cTACE in treating RAML patients.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 54 RAML patients treated by CSM-TACE (n = 17) or cTACE (n = 37). Data on tumor size, tumor volume reduction ratio, patient percentage with tumor size reduction, white blood cells (WBCs), creatinine (Cre) after treatment, complications, and adverse events were retrieved.

Results

Tumor size (88.66 vs. 81.19 cm3, P = 0.970), patient percentage with tumor size reduction (12 [70.59%] vs. 30 [81.08%], P = 0.486) after treatment, WBCs (P = 0.114), Cre (P = 0.659), and change in Cre after treatment (P = 0.947) were not significantly different between groups, whereas tumor volume reduction ratio was slightly lower in the CSM-TACE group than in the cTACE group (12 ± 34% vs. 32 ± 31%, P = 0.047). The most common postoperative complication was a post-embolization syndrome, including fever, nausea, and abdominal pain, which occurred in 9 (52.94%) and 14 (37.84%) patients from the CSM-TACE and cTACE groups, respectively (P = 0.347).

Conclusion

CSM-TACE is effective in and well tolerated by RAML patients, implying its potential as an alternative therapy.

Locoregional Therapy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) has a poor prognosis, and surgical resection (SR) offers the only potential for cure. Unfortunately, only a small proportion of patients are eligible for resection due to locally advanced or metastatic disease. Locoregional therapies (LRT) are often used in unresectable liver-only or liver-dominant ICC. This review explores the role of these therapies in the treatment of ICC, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), transarterial radioembolization (TARE), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of chemotherapy, irreversible electroporation (IE), and brachytherapy. A search of the current literature was performed to examine types of LRT currently used in the treatment of ICC. We examined patient selection, technique, and outcomes of each type. Overall, LRTs are well-tolerated in the treatment of ICC and are effective in improving overall survival (OS) in this patient population. Further studies are needed to reduce bias from heterogenous patient populations and small sample sizes, as well as to determine whether certain LRTs are superior to others and to examine optimal treatment selection.

DEB-TACE with irinotecan versus C-TACE for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a prospective clinical study

Objectives: DEB-TACE with irinotecan and C-TACE were compared with regards to safety and efficacy for the therapy of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Methods: Institutional Review Board approved our trial and we registered it in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1900022856). Forty patients with biopsy-confirmed ICC were randomised to either receive DEB-TACE or C-TACE treatment with 20 patients in each treatment arm. The primary endpoints objective response rate (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS) using the mRECIST to evaluate the tumours. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and safety. The chi-square was used to analyse the data. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox analysis were used to evaluate the survival data. Results: ORR (70% in DEB-TACE group vs. 20% in C-TACE, p = .001) at 1 month after therapy, ORR (50% vs. 15%, p = .018) at 3 months and DCR (70% vs. 30%, p = .011) at 6 months, while no difference was found in other groups. (all p > .05) The median PFS with DEB-TACE was longer than that with C-TACE (8.0 months vs. 3.0 months) (p = .042). Although the median OS was longer with DEB-TACE than with C-TACE (11.5 months vs. 9.0 months), the difference was not statistically significant (p = .280). The Cox regression analysis demonstrated that TACE sessions (p = .017) and low CA125 levels (p = .001) were independent favourable prognostic factors. The most frequent adverse event was elevated transaminase levels (20/20 in DEB-TACE group vs. 15/20 in C-TACE group) (p = .047). Conclusion: Our prospective study suggested better ORR and PFS with DEB-TACE with irinotecan as compared to C-TACE with irinotecan in the treatment of unresectable ICC.

Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Bead TACE in the Treatment of Primary or Secondary Liver Cancer

Background

The drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) has already been used in hepatic malignancies. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DEB-TACE in treating primary or secondary liver cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 59 patients with hepatic malignancies, including 41 patients with primary liver cancer and 18 patients with secondary liver cancer, between September 2016 and February 2019. All patients were treated with DEB-TACE. Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated by mRECIST. The pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS) where 0 represented no pain, and a score of ten was unbearable. Adverse reactions were assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0 (CTCAE4.0).

Results

In the subgroup of primary liver cancer, 3 patients (7.32%) got complete response, 13 patients (31.71%) got partial response, 21 patients (51.22%) experienced stable disease, and 4 patients (9.76%) suffered progressive disease; ORR was 39.02% and DCR was 90.24%. In the subgroup of secondary liver cancer, 0 patients (0%) got complete response, 6 patients (33.33%) got partial response, 11 patients (61.11%) experienced stable disease, and 1 patient (5.56%) suffered progressive disease; ORR was 33.33% and DCR was 94.44%. We did not find any difference when comparing the efficacy between primary and secondary liver cancer (P=0.612). The one-year survival rate was 70.73% for primary liver cancer and 61.11% for secondary liver cancer. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.52). For the patients with CR or PR, no factor could predict the efficacy of DEB-TACE. The most common treatment-related adverse reactions were short-term liver function disorders. The symptoms included fever (20.34%), abdomen pain (16.95%), and vomiting (5.08%), all patients with adverse reactions got remission after treatment.

Conclusions

DEB-TACE has a promising effect in the treatment of primary or secondary liver cancer. The treatment-related adverse reactions are tolerable.

Conventional and drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and pooled analysis

PURPOSE

Patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) have poor survival. Conventional transarterial chemoembolization (c-TACE) and drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) are two treatment options for ICC, and this systematic review describes the efficacy of each of these modalities for unresectable ICC to guide clinical practice.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases regarding transhepatic arterial chemoembolization for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment Scale (NOS) was used to assess the risk of bias. Tumor response, disease control, and 1-, 2-, 3-year overall survival rate were pooled for estimation.

RESULTS

The number of initial search results was 1035, and 19 articles met the inclusion criteria for this study after the screening. A total of 23 study cohorts and 1091 patients were provided. The pooled objective response rate (ORR) for c-TACE and DEB-TACE treating ICC was 29.4% (95% CI 11.6-50.8%) and 51.2% (95% CI 30.6-71.7%), respectively; disease control rate (DCR) was 72.8% (95% CI 55.6-87.3%) and 88.7% (95% CI 78.8-96.2%), respectively. The pooled survival rate at 1 year, 2 year, and 3 year was 49.7% (95% CI 39.1-60.3%), 24.0% (95% CI 12.6-37.3%), and 23.5% (95% CI 11.1-38.7%) for c-TACE; 58.6% (95% CI 44.2-72.3%), 26.7% (95% CI 18.1-36.3%), and 16.2% (95% CI 6.0-29.4%) for DEB-TACE.

CONCLUSION

The descriptive analysis suggested that DEB-TACE treatment for ICC may have better tumor response and disease control rates than c-TACE treatment, but the impact on overall survival was not demonstrated significantly by DEB-TACE treatment.

Locoregional Therapy in the Management of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Is There Sufficient Evidence to Guide Current Clinical Practice?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) carries a dismal prognosis and, despite increasing incidence, still lacks effective treatments. In this scenario, locoregional therapies (LRT) are gaining interest as they may be effective at local tumor control and complementary to surgical and non-surgical approaches. In this article, we will review the evolving role of LRT performed by interventional radiologists in the management of iCCA.

RECENT FINDINGS

Accumulating retrospective evidence indicates that ablative therapies and transarterial embolizations are of benefit for iCCA with unresectable disease, demonstrating promising safety profiles and prolonged or comparable survival outcomes compared to systemic therapy and surgery. Additionally, for surgical candidates, portal ± hepatic venous embolization can improve the safety of hepatectomy by inducing preoperative hypertrophy of the non-involved liver lobe. LRTs are playing an increasingly important role in the multimodal treatment of iCCA from various perspectives with reduced toxicity relative to traditional treatments. To expand the scope of applications for LRTs in this setting, future prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm their efficacy and advantage.

One-step fabrication of lidocaine/CalliSpheres® composites for painless transcatheter arterial embolization

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) is one of the first-line treatments for advanced hepatocellular cancer. The pain caused by TAE is a stark complication, which remains to be prevented by biomedical engineering methods.

METHODS

Herein, a commercial embolic agent CalliSpheres^® bead (CB) was functionally modified with lidocaine (Lid) using an electrostatic self-assembly technique. The products were coded as CB/Lid-n (n = 0, 5, 10, corresponding to the relative content of Lid). The chemical compositions, morphology, drug-loading, and drug-releasing ability of CB/Lid-n were comprehensively investigated. The biocompatibility was determined by hemolysis assay, live/dead cell staining assay, CCK8 assay, immunofluorescence (IHC) staining assay and quantitative real-time PCR. The thermal withdrawal latency (TWL) and edema ratio (ER) were performed to evaluate the analgesia of CB/Lid-n using a plantar inflammation model. A series of histological staining, including immunohistochemistry (IL-6, IL-10, TGF-β and Navi1.7) and TUNEL were conducted to reveal the underlying mechanism of anti-tumor effect of CB/Lid-n on a VX2-tumor bearing model.

RESULTS

Lid was successfully loaded onto the surface of CalliSpheres^® bead, and the average diameter of CalliSpheres^® bead increased along with the dosage of Lid. CB/Lid-n exhibited desirable drug-loading ratio, drug-embedding ratio, and sustained drug-release capability. CB/Lid-n had mild toxicity towards L929 cells, while triggered no obvious hemolysis. Furthermore, CB/Lid-n could improve the carrageenan-induced inflammation response micro-environment in vivo and in vitro. We found that CB/Lid-10 could selectively kill tumor by blocking blood supply, inhibiting cell proliferation, and promoting cell apoptosis. CB/Lid-10 could also release Lid to relieve post-operative pain, mainly by remodeling the harsh inflammation micro-environment (IME).

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, CB/Lid-10 has relatively good biocompatibility and bioactivity, and it can serve as a promising candidate for painless transcatheter arterial embolization.

Callispheres drug-eluting bead transhepatic artery chemoembolization with oral delivery of sorafenib for the treatment of unresectable liver cancer

Objective

Liver cancer is a significant contributor to global burden of cancer. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard of care for patients with unresectable liver cancer, and CalliSpheres, as novel drug-eluting bead (DEB) microspheres, have been found to be associated with a high tumor response rate. However, the outcomes after DEB-TACE treatment are not always satisfactory with tumor recurrence. Herein, we attempt to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of DEB-TACE with sorafenib and conventional TACE in treating advanced liver cancer.

Methods

The study retrospectively reviewed clinical records of 96 patients with liver cancer, among which there were 48 cases receiving DEB-TACE with sorafenib and 48 cases receiving conventional TACE. The physical properties of Callispheres were evaluated in HepG2 cells and a B6/J mouse model.

Results

DEB-TACE with Callispheres were demonstrated to effectively maintain stability and prolong the half-life of epirubicin. Compared with the patients receiving conventional TACE, those receiving DEB-TACE with sorafenib exhibited better patient outcomes with increased survival rate, reduced tumor volume, and declined levels of tumor markers. Additionally, DEB-TACE with Callispheres could effectively protect liver function, as well as reduce the toxic effects of loaded epirubicin, and its combination with sorafenib would not increase the incidence of adverse reactions.

Conclusion

DEB-TACE using CalliSpheres combined with sorafenib could prevent the progression of liver cancer and bring a better prognosis.

Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization Combining Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Purpose

To assess the effectiveness and safety of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (DEB-TACE+ICIs) versus chemotherapy (gemcitabine+cisplatin) for patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA).

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study included unresectable iCCA patients treated with DEB-TACE+ICIs or chemotherapy between May, 2019 and August, 2021. The differences in tumor responses, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were compared between the 2 groups. Patient baseline characteristics, PFS, and OS were compared among 2 groups before and after propensity score-matching (PSM). Factors affecting PFS and OS were analyzed by Cox’s proportional hazards regression model.

Results

The study included 49 patients with unresectable iCCA patients, 20 in the DEB-TACE+ICIs group and 29 in the chemotherapy group. PSM analysis created 20 pairs of patients in 2 groups. The patients in the DEB-TACE+ICIs group had a higher objective response rate (55.0% vs. 20.0%, P=0.022), higher PFS (median, 7.2 vs. 5.7 months, P=0.036), and higher OS (median, 13.2 vs. 7.6 months, P=0.015) than those in the chemotherapy group. Multivariate analyses suggested that chemotherapy, tumor size >5cm, and multiple tumors were the independent risk factors for PFS and OS. The incidence of TRAEs was similar between the 2 groups.

Conclusion

Compared to chemotherapy, DEB-TACE plus ICIs improved survival and was well-tolerated in patients with unresectable iCCA.

Treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using transarterial chemoembolisation with irinotecan-eluting beads: analysis of efficacy and safety

PURPOSE

This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and factors affecting the prognosis of transarterial chemoembolisation with irinotecan-eluting beads with CalliSpheres (DEB-TACE) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected data on 39 patients with unresectable ICC who received DEB-TACE therapy. We assessed the indicators of tumour response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the incidence of adverse events. PFS and OS were analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves, while Cox analysis was used to identify factors affecting the prognosis.

RESULTS

The 3-month objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of the 39 patients with unresectable ICC were 35.9% and 56.4%, respectively, while the 6-month ORR and DCR were 23.0% and 40.9%, respectively. The median OS and PFS were 11.0 months and 8.0 months, respectively. Cox analysis demonstrated that combined therapy (adjuvant sorafenib after DEB-TACE) and a low cancer antigen (CA) 125 level (≤ 35 U/ml) were independent favourable prognostic factors. Transient elevation of the aminotransferase level, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, fever, and hyper-bilirubinaemia were common adverse events in patients with unresectable ICC treated with DEB-TACE with CalliSphere beads (CBs). Hepatic abscess was the most serious complication, observed in one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

DEB-TACE with CBs is a safe and well-tolerated therapy in patients with unresectable ICC with a low incidence of adverse events and relatively prolonged survival. Combined therapy and low CA125 are prognostic factors associated with longer survival.

The short-term efficacy of DEB-TACE loaded with epirubicin and raltitrexed in the treatment of intermediate and advanced primary hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the short-term efficacy of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) loaded with epirubicin and raltitrexed in the treatment of intermediate and advanced primary hepatocellular carcinoma (PHC).

METHODS

One hundred patients with intermediate or advanced PHC were randomly divided into a control group (the CG, n=50) and an observation group (the OG, n=50). The CG was treated with conventional TACE (cTACE), and the OG was treated with DEB-TACE loaded with epirubicin and raltitrexed. The overall efficiency, the liver function indices, the tumor markers, the macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) levels , the lesion diameters, the Child-Pugh scores, the adverse reactions, the median times to disease progression, the 1-year and 2-year recurrence rates, and the survival rates were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

At 6 months after the surgery, the overall response rate in the OG (82.00%) was higher than it was in the CG (62.00%) (P<0.05). The serum alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, and aspartate aminotransferase levels were elevated in both groups after the intervention, but they were lower in the OG than they were in the CG (P<0.05). The serum alpha-fetoprotein, carcinoembryonic antigen, and MIF levels, and the lesion diameters were lower in both groups at one month after the intervention, and they were lower in the OG than they were in the CG (P<0.05). The incidence of abnormal blood test results in the OG was lower than it was in the CG (P<0.05). The OG also exhibited a longer median time to disease progression, lower 1-year and 2-year recurrence rates, and higher 1- and 2-year survival rates than the CG (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

DEB-TACE loaded with epirubicin and raltitrexed improves the short-term outcomes, reduces the tumor load, decreases the incidence of adverse events, and improves the survival rate in patients with intermediate and advanced PHC.

Interventional Treatment for Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most common type of primary liver malignancy. The latest classification includes intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, with the latter one further categorized into perihilar and distal cholangiocarcinoma. Although surgical resection is the preferred treatment for CCA, less than half of the patients are actually eligible for radical surgical resection. Interventional treatment, such as intra-arterial therapies, ablation, and brachytherapy (iodine-125 seed implantation), has become an acceptable palliative treatment for patients with unresectable CCA. For these patients, interventional treatment is helpful for locoregional control, symptom relief, and improving quality of life. Herein, in a timely and topical manner, we will review these advances and highlight future directions of research in this article.