Efficacy and Safety of Apatinib Combined with Etoposide in Patients with Recurrent Platinum-resistant Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Study

TOP2A modulates signaling via the AKT/mTOR pathway to promote ovarian cancer cell proliferation

Ovarian cancer (OC) is a form of gynecological malignancy that is associated with worse patient outcomes than any other cancer of the female reproductive tract. Topoisomerase II α (TOP2A) is commonly regarded as an oncogene that is associated with malignant disease progression in a variety of cancers, its mechanistic functions in OC have yet to be firmly established. We explored the role of TOP2A in OC through online databases, clinical samples, in vitro and in vivo experiments. And initial analyses of public databases revealed high OC-related TOP2A expression in patient samples that was related to poorer prognosis. This was confirmed by clinical samples in which TOP2A expression was elevated in OC relative to healthy tissue. Kaplan-Meier analyses further suggested that higher TOP2A expression levels were correlated with worse prognosis in OC patients. In vitro, TOP2A knockdown resulted in the inhibition of OC cell proliferation, with cells entering G1 phase arrest and undergoing consequent apoptotic death. In rescue assays, TOP2A was confirmed to regulate cell proliferation and cell cycle through AKT/mTOR pathway activity. Mouse model experiments further affirmed the key role that TOP2A plays as a driver of OC cell proliferation. These data provide strong evidence supporting TOP2A as an oncogenic mediator and prognostic biomarker related to OC progression and poor outcomes. At the mechanistic level, TOP2A can control tumor cell growth via AKT/mTOR pathway modulation. These preliminary results provide a foundation for future research seeking to explore the utility of TOP2A inhibitor-based combination treatment regimens in platinum-resistant recurrent OC patients.

The efficacy, safety, and beneficiary population of angiogenesis inhibitor apatinib plus chemotherapy in recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients: A comparative cohort study

AIM

Angiogenesis inhibitor apatinib targets vascular endothelial growth factor receptors and improves the outcomes of patients with gynecologic malignancy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of angiogenesis inhibitor apatinib plus chemotherapy in recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (RPR-OC) patients.

METHODS

This study retrieved 67 RPR-OC patients who received apatinib plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone and divided them into apatinib + chemo (N = 30) and chemo alone (N = 37) groups according to the actual medication.

RESULTS

Objective response rate (36.7% vs. 16.2%, p = 0.056) and disease control rate (80.0% vs. 59.5%, p = 0.072) showed an increased trend in apatinib + chemo group versus chemo alone group. The progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.010) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.042) were prolonged in apatinib + chemo group versus chemo alone group. The median (95%confidence interval [CI]) PFS was 5.9 (5.5-6.3) months in apatinib + chemo group and 3.8 (2.0-5.6) months in chemo alone group. The median (95%CI) OS was 20.5 (16.5-24.5) months in apatinib + chemo group and 13.6 (8.6-18.6) months in chemo alone group. Apatinib plus chemotherapy was independently related with better PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.354, p < 0.001) and OS (HR: 0.116, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses indicated that patients with a more serious disease condition might benefit more from apatinib plus chemotherapy. No difference was found in adverse events of all grade or grade ≥3 between the two groups (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Angiogenesis inhibitor apatinib plus chemotherapy shows better treatment efficacy than chemotherapy alone with controllable safety profile in RPR-OC patients.

Efficacy and safety of combined anlotinib-oral etoposide treatment for patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

Despite the availability of numerous treatment options, managing patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) remains challenging, and the prognosis of PROC is notably unfavorable. This retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of combined anlotinib-oral etoposide treatment for patients with PROC.

METHODS

Data of 23 patients who were diagnosed with PROC from January 2020 to November 2022 and treated with anlotinib combined with oral etoposide for at least 2 cycles were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Among per-protocol patients, 9 (45.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI]=21.1-68.9) of 20 patients achieved partial response and 17 (85.0%, 95% CI=67.9-100.0) of 20 patients achieved disease control. The median progression-free survival was 8.7 months (95% CI=5.3-11.6). The incidence of adverse events (any grade) was 100%, and the incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events was 54.5%.

CONCLUSION

Anlotinib combined with etoposide emerged effective for the treatment of PROC.

Apatinib plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel monotherapy for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer treatment: A retrospective cohort study

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Apatinib, an oral antiangiogenic drug, exerts potential anti-tumour effects on platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (PROC). This study intended to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib plus paclitaxel compared to paclitaxel monotherapy in PROC patients.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study reviewed 70 PROC patients who received apatinib plus paclitaxel (apatinib plus paclitaxel group) (N = 32) or paclitaxel monotherapy (paclitaxel monotherapy group) (N = 38). The recommended regimens were as follows: paclitaxel (60 mg/m² ) administrated once a week with a maximum of 18 weeks; apatinib (250-375 mg/day) administrated until disease progression or patient intolerance.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Disease control rate was elevated (84.4% vs. 60.5%, P = 0.028), whereas objective response rate only disclosed an increasing trend (lacked statistical significance) (37.5% vs. 18.4%, P = 0.074) in apatinib plus paclitaxel group compared with paclitaxel monotherapy group. Progression-free survival (median [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 5.0 [2.5-7.5] months vs. 3.8 [2.4-5.2] months, P = 0.033) and overall survival (median [95% CI]: 21.1 [13.2-29.0] months vs. 14.8 [11.4-18.2] months, P = 0.032) were both prolonged in apatinib plus paclitaxel group compared to paclitaxel monotherapy group, which were further verified in the multivariate Cox's proportional hazard regression analyses (both P < 0.050). Additionally, the incidence of each adverse event was not different between the two groups (all P > 0.050).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Apatinib plus paclitaxel exhibits better efficacy and acceptable toxicity compared with paclitaxel monotherapy in PROC patients.

A Comparison of Chemotherapy Used with and without Apatinib for Patients with Ovarian Carcinoma Who Progressed after Standard Regimens: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the therapeutic efficacy and clinical safety of the combination therapy of apatinib plus chemotherapy with that of chemotherapy alone in patients with refractory or recurrent ovarian carcinoma (OC).

METHODS

Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCT) or case-control studies (CCS) were identified by searching Chinese and English databases up to October 31, 2020. The risk of methodological bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) were used to assess trial quality. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to evaluate the therapeutic effects and adverse drug reactions. Subgroup analyses of study type, study sample size, dosage of apatinib, and chemotherapy regimen between treatment group and control group were performed. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plot symmetry, Begg-Mazumdar test, and Egger test. The robustness of our results was presented by removing the trial one by one.

RESULTS

Fifteen eligible studies covering 1,020 patients were included in this review and meta-analysis. Among these studies, 8 were RCTs, and 7 were CCSs. Compared with chemotherapy alone, apatinib plus chemotherapy significantly increased objective response rate (OR = 3.55; 95% CI 2.31 to 5.47), disease control rate (OR = 3.04; 95% CI 2.12 to 4.36), and overall survival (OR = 5.03; 95% CI 3.16 to 6.90).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination treatment of apatinib plus chemotherapy provides better clinical benefits for OC patients when compared to chemotherapy alone and should be recommended for suitable patients with OC after the failure of standard regimens. However, further investigation into future large-scale prospective randomized research is still needed.

Programmed death ligand-1 regulates angiogenesis and metastasis by participating in the c-JUN/VEGFR2 signaling axis in ovarian cancer

Background

Although programmed cell death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) plays a well‐known function in immune checkpoint response by interacting with programmed cell death‐1 (PD‐1), the cell‐intrinsic role of PD‐L1 in tumors is still unclear. Here, we explored the molecular regulatory mechanism of PD‐L1 in the progression and metastasis of ovarian cancer.

Methods

Immunohistochemistry of benign tissues and ovarian cancer samples was performed, followed by migration, invasion, and angiogenesis assays in PD‐L1‐knockdown ovarian cancer cells. Immunoprecipitation, mass spectrometry, and chromatin immunoprecipitation were conducted along with zebrafish and mouse experiments to explore the specific functions and mechanisms of PD‐L1 in ovarian cancer.

Results

Our results showed that PD‐L1 induced angiogenesis, which further promoted cell migration and invasion in vitro and in vivo of ovarian cancer. Mechanistically, PD‐L1 was identified to directly interact with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor‐2 (VEGFR2) and then activated the FAK/AKT pathway, which further induced angiogenesis and tumor progression, leading to poor prognosis of ovarian cancer patients. Meanwhile, PD‐L1 was found to be regulated by the oncogenic transcription factor c‐JUN at the transcriptional level, which enhanced the expression of PD‐L1 in ovarian cancer. Furthermore, we demonstrated that PD‐L1 inhibitor durvalumab, combined with the antiangiogenic drug, apatinib, could enhance the effect of anti‐angiogenesis and the inhibition of cell migration and invasion.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrated that PD‐L1 promoted the angiogenesis and metastasis of ovarian cancer by participating in the c‐JUN/VEGFR2 signaling axis, suggesting that the combination of PD‐L1 inhibitor and antiangiogenic drugs may be considered as a potential therapeutic approach for ovarian cancer patients.