Clinical and contrast-enhanced image features in the prediction model for the detection of small hepatocellular carcinomas

Advancements in Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Imaging Diagnostics for the Management of Liver Disease-Applications and Challenges in Personalized Care

Liver disease can significantly impact life expectancy, making early diagnosis and therapeutic intervention critical challenges in medical care. Imaging diagnostics play a crucial role in diagnosing and managing liver diseases. Recently, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical imaging analysis has become indispensable in healthcare. AI, trained on vast datasets of medical images, has sometimes demonstrated diagnostic accuracy that surpasses that of human experts. AI-assisted imaging diagnostics are expected to contribute significantly to the standardization of diagnostic quality. Furthermore, AI has the potential to identify image features that are imperceptible to humans, thereby playing an essential role in clinical decision-making. This capability enables physicians to make more accurate diagnoses and develop effective treatment strategies, ultimately improving patient outcomes. Additionally, AI is anticipated to become a powerful tool in personalized medicine. By integrating individual patient imaging data with clinical information, AI can propose optimal plans for treatment, making it an essential component in the provision of the most appropriate care for each patient. Current reports highlight the advantages of AI in managing liver diseases. As AI technology continues to evolve, it is expected to advance personalized diagnostics and treatments and contribute to overall improvements in healthcare quality.

Artificial intelligence in liver imaging: methods and applications

Liver disease is regarded as one of the major health threats to humans. Radiographic assessments hold promise in terms of addressing the current demands for precisely diagnosing and treating liver diseases, and artificial intelligence (AI), which excels at automatically making quantitative assessments of complex medical image characteristics, has made great strides regarding the qualitative interpretation of medical imaging by clinicians. Here, we review the current state of medical-imaging-based AI methodologies and their applications concerning the management of liver diseases. We summarize the representative AI methodologies in liver imaging with focusing on deep learning, and illustrate their promising clinical applications across the spectrum of precise liver disease detection, diagnosis and treatment. We also address the current challenges and future perspectives of AI in liver imaging, with an emphasis on feature interpretability, multimodal data integration and multicenter study. Taken together, it is revealed that AI methodologies, together with the large volume of available medical image data, might impact the future of liver disease care.

Comparison of clinical-computed tomography model with 2D and 3D radiomics models to predict occult peritoneal metastases in advanced gastric cancer

PURPOSE

To compare the ability of a clinical-computed tomography (CT) model vs. 2D and 3D radiomics models for predicting occult peritoneal metastasis (PM) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we included 49 patients with occult PM and 49 control patients (without PM) who underwent preoperative CT and subsequent surgery between January 2016 and December 2018. Clinical information and CT semantic features were collected, and CT radiomics features were extracted. A predictive clinical-CT model was created using multivariate logistic regression. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm and logistic regression were used for constructing 2D and 3D radiomics models. These models were validated with an external cohort (n = 30). Receiver operating characteristics curve with area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were used to evaluate predictive performance.

RESULTS

Tumor size, mild ascites, and serum CA125 were independent factors predictive of occult PM. The clinical-CT model of these independent factors showed better diagnostic performance than 2D and 3D radiomics models. In the external validation cohort, the AUCs of different models were as follows-clinical-CT model: 0.853 (sensitivity, 66.7%; specificity, 93.3%); 2D radiomics model: 0.622 (sensitivity, 80.0%; specificity, 46.7%); and 3D radiomics model: 0.676 (sensitivity, 60.0%; specificity, 86.0%). The clinical-CT model nomogram showed good clinical predictive efficiency to assess occult PM.

CONCLUSION

The clinical-CT model was better than the radiomics models in predicting occult PM in AGC.