A New Method for the Detection of Colorectal Cancer and the Precancerous Lesions: Occult Blood Testing Combination with Promoter Methylation in the Fecal Sample

Characterization of the internal working-life exposome using minimally and non-invasive sampling methods - a narrative review

During recent years, we are moving away from the 'one exposure, one disease'-approach in occupational settings and towards a more comprehensive approach, taking into account the totality of exposures during a life course by using an exposome approach. Taking an exposome approach however is accompanied by many challenges, one of which, for example, relates to the collection of biological samples. Methods used for sample collection in occupational exposome studies should ideally be minimally invasive, while at the same time sensitive, and enable meaningful repeated sampling in a large population and over a longer time period. This might be hampered in specific situations e.g., people working in remote areas, during pandemics or with flexible work hours. In these situations, using self-sampling techniques might offer a solution. Therefore, our aim was to identify existing self-sampling techniques and to evaluate the applicability of these techniques in an occupational exposome context by conducting a literature review. We here present an overview of current self-sampling methodologies used to characterize the internal exposome. In addition, the use of different biological matrices was evaluated and subdivided based on their level of invasiveness and applicability in an occupational exposome context. In conclusion, this review and the overview of self-sampling techniques presented herein can serve as a guide in the design of future (occupational) exposome studies while circumventing sample collection challenges associated with exposome studies.

Noninvasive fecal testing for colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy worldwide, with the second highest mortality rate among all malignancies. In this review, we describe the current utility of stool diagnostic biomarkers for CRC.

METHODS

We reviewed stool-related tests and biomarker candidates for the diagnosis of CRC. The guaiac-based fecal occult blood test (gFOBT), fecal immunochemical test (FIT), and multitarget stool DNA test (MT-sDNA) have been used as clinical CRC screening tools. Although microRNAs, protein biomarkers, and microbiota have not yet been used in clinical CRC screening, there is growing evidence that they have the potential to function as CRC screening tools.

RESULTS

According to the literature, the sensitivity of MT-sDNA for detecting CRC was 87.0-100%, 32.7-82.0% for advanced adenomas, and the specificity was 86.1-95.2%. The sensitivity of individual biomarkers of fecal microRNAs for detecting CRC was 34.2-88.2%, 73.0% for advanced adenomas, and the specificity was 68-100%. The sensitivity of fecal protein markers for detecting CRC was 63.6-93.0%, 47.7-69.4% for advanced adenomas, and the specificity was 38.3-97.5%. The sensitivity of fecal microbiota for detecting CRC was 54.0-100.0%, 32.0-48.3% for advanced adenomas, and the specificity was 61.3-90.0%.

CONCLUSION

MT-sDNA is the most sensitive CRC screening test, and its sensitivity is the highest for advanced adenomas; however, its detection cost is high. MT-sDNA was more sensitive to CRC and advanced precancerous lesions than FIT, but compared to three years of MT-sDNA, annual FIT as the first non-invasive screening test for CRC seemed to be more effective.

Promising Epigenetic Biomarkers for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review

In CRC, screening compliance is decreased due to the experienced discomfort associated with colonoscopy, although this method is the gold standard in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Promoter DNA methylation (hypomethylation or hypermethylation) has been linked to all CRC stages. Study objectives: to systematically review the current knowledge on approved biomarkers, reveal new potential ones, and inspect tactics that can improve performance. This research was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines; the risk of bias was evaluated using the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies criteria (QUADAS-2). The Web of Science® Core Collection, MEDLINE® and Scopus® databases were searched for original articles published in peer-reviewed journals with the specific keywords "colorectal cancer", "early detection", "early-stage colorectal cancer", "epigenetics", "biomarkers", "DNA methylation biomarkers", "stool or blood or tissue or biopsy", "NDRG4", "BMP3", "SEPT9", and "SDC2". Based on eligibility criteria, 74 articles were accepted for analysis. mSDC2 and mSEPT9 were frequently assessed in studies, alone or together as part of the ColoDefense panel test-the latter with the greatest performance. mBMP3 may not be an appropriate marker for detecting CRC. A panel of five methylated binding sites of the CTCF gene holds the promise for early-stage specific detection of CRC. CRC screening compliance and accuracy can be enhanced by employing a stool mt-DNA methylation test.