Reconstruction of large facial defects using a combination of forehead flap and other procedures

Comparison of local flaps versus skin grafts as reconstruction methods for defects in the medial canthal region

BACKGROUND

The medial canthal region features a complex three-dimensional and internal anatomical structure. When reconstructing a defect in this area, it is crucial to consider both functional and aesthetic aspects, which presents significant challenges. Generally, local flaps are preferred for reconstruction; however, skin grafts can be used when local flaps are not feasible. Therefore, we conducted a comparative analysis of surgical outcomes skin grafts when local flaps were not feasible, to determine which surgical method is more effective for medial canthal region reconstruction.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients who underwent medial canthal region reconstruction using skin grafts or local flaps from 2002 to 2021 were enrolled. Patient information was obtained from medical records. Five plastic surgeons evaluated the surgical outcomes based on general appearance, color, contour, and symmetry.

RESULTS

Skin grafts were used in eight patients and local flaps were used in 13. Combined reconstructions were employed in four cases. Minor complications arose in four cases but improved with conservative treatment. No major complications were reported. Recurrence of the skin cancer was noted in two cases. All categories showed higher scores for the local flap compared to both skin graft and combined reconstruction; however, the differences were not statistically significant respectively.

CONCLUSION

The choice of appropriate surgical methods for reconstructing defects in the medial canthal region depends on various factors, including the patient's overall health, the size and depth of the defect, and the degree of involvement of surrounding structures. When a local flap is not feasible, a skin graft may provide favorable surgical outcomes. Therefore, a skin graft can serve as a viable alternative for reconstructing the medial canthal region.

Palmar reconstruction using full-thickness skin grafts from the groin and lateral malleolus regions: A comparison of long-term outcomes

Using the skin of the lateral malleolus region for reconstruction of smaller areas of the palm may yield better outcomes than using the skin of the groin region. However, no previous study has provided long-term data comparing the groin and lateral malleolus regions as donor sites for full-thickness skin grafts (FTSGs) in palmar reconstruction. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the groin and lateral malleolus regions as donor sites for FTSGs in palmar reconstruction over a long-term follow-up period. The patients were classified into groin and lateral malleolus region groups (n = 15 each). Measurements were obtained at the graft site, the contralateral site corresponding to the graft site, and the donor site. A chromameter was used to measure skin color, and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) was used to evaluate the scar at the skin graft site. Compared to the groin region group, the lateral malleolus region group showed skin colors that were closer to the original color of the palm in terms of lightness and red/green values. Additionally, the lateral malleolus region group received better esthetic ratings in the POSAS. Our results revealed that using the lateral malleolus region for FTSGs in palmar reconstruction resulted in better outcomes than using the groin region, even over a long period.

Artificial Intelligence-Based Modeling Can Predict Face Shape Based on Underlying Craniomaxillofacial Bone

Reconstructing facial deformities is often challenging due to the complex 3-dimensional (3D) anatomy of the craniomaxillofacial skeleton and overlying soft tissue structures. Bilateral injuries cannot benefit from mirroring techniques and as such preinjury information (eg, 2D pictures or 3D imaging) may be utilized to determine or estimate the desired 3D face shape. When patient-specific information is not available, other options such as statistical shape models may be employed; however, these models require registration to a consistent orientation which may be challenging. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been used to identify facial features and generate highly realistic simulated faces. As such, it was hypothesized that AI can be used to predict 3D face shape by learning its relationship with the underlying bone surface anatomy in a subject-specific manner. An automated image processing and AI modeling workflow using a modified 3D UNet was generated to estimate 3D face shape using the underlying bone geometry and additional metadata (eg, body mass index and age) obtained from 5 publicly available computed tomography imaging datasets. Visually, the trained models provided a reasonable prediction of the contour and geometry of the facial tissues. The pipeline achieved a validation dice=0.89 when trained on the combined 5 datasets, with the highest dice=0.925 achieved with the single HNSCC dataset. Estimated predefect facial geometry may ultimately be used to aid preoperative craniomaxillofacial surgical planning, providing geometries for intraoperative templates, guides, navigation, molds, and forming tools. Automated face shape prediction may additionally be useful in forensic studies to aid in the identification of unknown skull remains.

Modified Keystone Perforator Island Flap Techniques for Small- to Moderate-Sized Scalp and Forehead Defect Coverage: A Retrospective Observational Study

We aimed to demonstrate the effective application of keystone perforator island flap (KPIF) in scalp and forehead reconstruction by demonstrating the authors' experience with modified KPIF reconstruction for small- to moderate-sized scalp and forehead defects. Twelve patients who underwent modified KPIF reconstruction of the scalp and forehead from September 2020 to July 2022 were enrolled in this study. In addition, we retrospectively reviewed and evaluated the patient's medical records and clinical photographs. All defects (size range, 2 cm × 2 cm to 3 cm × 7 cm) were successfully covered using four modified KPIF techniques (hemi-KPIF, Sydney Melanoma Unit Modification KPIF, omega variation closure KPIF, and modified type II KPIF) with ancillary procedures (additional skin grafts and local flaps). All flaps (size range, 3.5 cm × 4 cm to 7 cm × 16 cm) fully survived, and only one patient developed marginal maceration that healed with conservative management. Furthermore, through the final scar evaluation with the patient satisfaction survey and Harris 4-stage scale, all patients were satisfied with their favorable outcomes at the average final follow-up period of 7.66 ± 2.14 months. The study showed that the KPIF technique with appropriate modifications is an excellent reconstructive modality for covering scalp and forehead defects.